SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tracey B. Leibowitz

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,860 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Tracey B. Leibowitz reflect a significant volume of cases heard at the Miami OHO. When comparing this judge to the broader office, the latest-period approval rate of 48% sits 15 percentage points below the office average of 63%. These figures are based on a docket of 3,860 lifetime decisions. These statistics represent historical trends rather than a fixed outcome for your hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 3,860
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Leibowitz Miami OHO National
Approval rate 48% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 40%
Denials 52%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Leibowitz's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Leibowitz
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Tracey B. Leibowitz has shown notable fluctuation since 2016. After a period of lower approval rates between 2016 and 2019, the judge saw a rise in approvals, peaking at 70% in 2024 before shifting to 48% in the most recent reporting period. These shifts reflect changes in the complexity of cases and the evidence presented over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Leibowitz's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Miami OHO hearing office

The Miami OHO serves a large population in Florida, handling a high volume of disability claims. The office features a bench of 13 judges who maintain an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 63%. You can expect a formal hearing process where the focus remains on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/miami-FL Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Tracey B. Leibowitz is essentially random. Across the 13 judges on record at this office since 2016, lifetime approval rates range from 32% to 83%. With 8 judges currently reporting in the latest period, you may be assigned to any member of this diverse bench. Preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions