SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lornette Reynolds

Last decided Miami OHOJul 2026
Decisions 3,257since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 49% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 32% to 83% range established by the bench at the Miami OHO. In the most recent reporting period, the 50% approval rate is compared against the office rate of 63%, the state rate of 59%, and the national rate of 58%. These figures represent historical trends rather than individual case outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 3,257
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Reynolds Miami OHO National
Approval rate 50% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 34% — —
Denials 50% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Reynolds's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Reynolds
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, 3,257 decisions have been issued, showing a pattern that has fluctuated over the last decade. While the approval rate saw a high of 54% in 2020, it has since adjusted, with the most recent fiscal year-to-date period showing a 50% approval rate. This latest figure reflects a continuation of the steady pattern observed throughout the record. These variations often stem from changes in the complexity of cases or the specific evidence presented in your disability claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Reynolds's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Miami OHO hearing office

The Miami OHO is the most recent office on record for this judge, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 13 judges who handle a high volume of disability hearings. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 63%, providing a benchmark for the local judicial environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Miami OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Miami OHO, and 8 of them decided cases here in the latest file. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 83% based on records since 2016. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions