SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Trina Mengesha-Brown

Last decided NHC St LouisJul 2026
Decisions 2,592since 2018

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While your judge's overall approval rate since 2018 is 45%, her latest-period approval rate of 48% sits 3 points above the NHC St Louis office average of 45%. These figures are derived from 2,592 decisions on record, providing a clear view of past activity.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 2,592
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Mengesha-Brown NHC St Louis National
Approval rate 48% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 38% — —
Denials 52% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mengesha-Brown's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mengesha-Brown
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Trina Mengesha-Brown has fluctuated since January 2018. After an initial 52% approval rate in 2018, the figures shifted over the following years, reaching 37% in 2022 before seeing a more recent recovery. The latest period shows a 48% approval rate, which reflects a continuation of this recent pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mengesha-Brown's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC St Louis hearing office

Trina Mengesha-Brown's most recent office on record is NHC St Louis, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 15 judges whose most recent work is recorded here. The office-wide latest approval rate is 45%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC St Louis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 6 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 40% to 79% on their records.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates in SSA's latest period (October 1, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Mengesha-Brown's 48%. All five last decided cases in Missouri.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Mengesha-Brown and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions