SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kathryn Preston

Last decided NHC St LouisJul 2026
Decisions 2,576since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Kathryn Preston has a 47% approval rate since 2017, her latest-period approval rate is 42%, which is 3 points below the NHC St Louis office average of 45%. These figures are derived from a docket of 2,576 decisions on record, providing a view of past trends. These aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 2,576
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Preston NHC St Louis National
Approval rate 42% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 29% — —
Denials 58% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Preston's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Preston
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since December 2017, Kathryn Preston has maintained a pattern of decisions across 2,576 cases on record. Her yearly approval rates have fluctuated, showing a peak of 55% in 2018 and a rate of 43% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This recent data reflects a shift compared to her overall average, which may be influenced by changes in the types of cases assigned to her docket.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Preston's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC St Louis hearing office

Kathryn Preston's most recent office on record is the NHC St Louis, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the Missouri region and maintains a bench of 15 judges who handle disability claims. The office-wide latest approval rate is 45%, and you can expect a review of your medical evidence. You can see the NHC St Louis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC St Louis

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is random. At the NHC St Louis office, there are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates among this bench range from 40% to 79% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates in SSA's latest period (October 1, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Preston's 42%. All five last decided cases in Missouri.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Preston and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions