SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John A. Pottinger

Last decided KingsportJul 2026
Decisions 3,132since 2018

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While your judge's overall approval rate on record since 2018 is 55%, recent data shows a 62% approval rate during the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 6 percentage points above the Kingsport office average of 56%. These statistics are based on a volume of 3,132 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 3,132
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Pottinger Kingsport National
Approval rate 62% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 58% — —
Denials 38% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pottinger's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pottinger
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2018, the approval rate for John A. Pottinger has shown a varied trend. After an initial 61% approval rate in 2018, the rate fluctuated, reaching 44% in 2019 before trending upward. The latest reporting period shows a 62% approval rate, which is a continuation of the pattern observed in 2023 and 2024. This recent performance reflects the judge's activity in the most recent reporting window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pottinger's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Kingsport hearing office

The Kingsport hearing office is the most recent office on record for John A. Pottinger as of July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 15 judges who manage disability claims. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. For more information, see the Kingsport hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Kingsport

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Kingsport hearing office, there are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates among these judges vary widely, ranging from 41% to 88% on their records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions