SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mary Ann Poulose

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,012 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Mary Ann Poulose reflect a history of decision-making within the Chicago hearing office. By comparing her lifetime record against the office-wide range of 41% to 82%, you can see how her patterns align with local peers. We rely on 3,012 lifetime decisions to provide this statistical confidence. These figures represent historical trends rather than a fixed outcome for your hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,012
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Poulose Chicago National
Approval rate 59% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 52%
Denials 41%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Poulose's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Poulose
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval record for Mary Ann Poulose has shown an upward trend. While her lifetime approval rate sits at 44%, her performance in the latest reporting period reached 59%. This shift represents a departure from earlier years, such as 2019, where the rate was lower. The latest period reflects a continuation of this recent pattern, which may be influenced by changes in case evidence or the specific mix of claims you and others present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Poulose's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Chicago hearing office

The Chicago hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 16 judges on record. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 54%, providing a benchmark for local proceedings. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Chicago Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Mary Ann Poulose is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 41% to 82%. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions