SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Steven C. Smith

On record 176 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Steven C. Smith is based on 176 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2017. This figure provides a baseline for understanding how his courtroom has historically processed disability claims. When compared to the broader Grand Rapids bench, which shows a lifetime approval range of 43% to 88%, his record sits at the upper end of the spectrum. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 88%
Decisions on record 176

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Smith. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Smith's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Smith
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision pattern for Steven C. Smith has remained consistent throughout his recorded history. Starting in 2016, he maintained an approval rate of 87%, followed by 88% in 2017. With 176 total decisions on record, this steady trend suggests a stable approach to evaluating evidence and medical documentation. This consistency helps provide a clear view of his historical decision-making, reflecting a reliable pattern over the observed period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Smith's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Grand Rapids hearing office

The Grand Rapids hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a key venue for disability adjudications in Michigan. The office maintains a bench of 10 judges on record, with a latest-period office-wide approval rate of 60%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical evidence supporting your claim. See the Grand Rapids Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom are reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 43% to 88% over their respective lifetime records. You can find more information on the Grand Rapids hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions