Jeffrey S. Wolfe is an ALJ at the Tulsa hearing office. Across the 1,800 decisions on record since 2016, 81% have been approved. The office's judges range from 37% to 81% on their lifetime records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rate for Jeffrey S. Wolfe reflects a significant volume of cases heard since 2016. By comparing this lifetime figure against the 37% to 81% range observed across the Tulsa bench, you can better understand how your assigned judge fits into the broader local context. These statistics rely on a substantial docket of 1,800 decisions, providing a clear view of historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Wolfe. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wolfe's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The record for Jeffrey S. Wolfe shows a consistent approval pattern over the period from 2016 to 2020. Starting at 76% in 2016, the annual approval rate has remained steady, reaching 85% in 2020. With 1,800 lifetime decisions on record, this trend indicates a stable approach to evaluating your disability claim. The recent data suggests a continuation of this established pattern, reflecting the judge's consistent application of Social Security Administration standards.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wolfe's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Reading this because a claim was denied? Decode the letter — what the sentence means, what to file, and by when.
About the Tulsa hearing office
The Tulsa hearing office serves you throughout Oklahoma, operating as a critical hub for regional disability determinations. The office maintains a diverse bench of 15 judges on record, ensuring that cases are processed according to federal guidelines. You can expect a formal hearing environment where your evidence quality remains the primary factor in a favorable decision. See the Tulsa Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 6 judges currently reporting in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 37% to 81%. You can find more information on the Tulsa hearing office page.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Jeffrey S. Wolfe holds an 81% lifetime approval rate, which sits at the high end of the 37% to 81% range observed among the 15 judges on record at the Tulsa office. While this rate is high, every case is unique, and an attorney can help you prepare a strategy tailored to your specific medical evidence.
The approval rate for Jeffrey S. Wolfe has remained steady, showing a consistent trend from 76% in 2016 to 85% in 2020. This stability across 1,800 lifetime decisions suggests a reliable approach to case evaluation. If you are concerned about how your case will be viewed, an attorney can help you understand the current requirements.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency across the office. Because you cannot choose your judge, an attorney can help you prepare for the hearing regardless of who is assigned.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears your testimony. You will likely be asked about your daily limitations and work history. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and organize your evidence to ensure the judge has a clear picture of your disability.
An approval rate is a probability based on past decisions, not a guarantee of a specific outcome for your hearing. While Jeffrey S. Wolfe has an 81% lifetime approval rate, your success depends on the strength of your medical evidence and how well you document your limitations. An attorney can help you identify gaps in your file before your hearing date.



