The 12-month wait for a hearing at the Springfield office is 4 months longer than the national average, providing you with a longer runway to build a robust file. With a 59% allowance rate, this office is well-positioned to approve well-documented claims. An attorney can help you secure updated medical records and prepare for the vocational expert's testimony, which is often the deciding factor in your case.
With a 12-month wait, you have a substantial period to ensure your medical records are complete and current. Your hearing will last roughly an hour, during which an ALJ will review your file and hear testimony. A vocational expert will likely be present to testify about whether jobs exist for someone with your specific physical or mental limitations. You should bring an updated list of all medications, including side effects, and a daily-activity log that clearly illustrates your functional challenges. Ensure all new evidence is submitted well before the hearing deadline, as last-minute additions are restricted. After the hearing, the judge's decision will be mailed to you.
The panel of 7 judges at the Springfield office is consistent, with allowance rates clustering between 53% and 67%. Because the judges operate within a narrow band, you can expect a predictable approach to evidence evaluation regardless of which judge is assigned to your case. The panel's cohesion means your outcome will depend primarily on the quality of your medical documentation.
A 12-month wait is preparation time you can use to bridge the gap between your initial denial and the specific evidence an ALJ needs to see. Because the Springfield panel is consistent, a well-prepared file that directly addresses your functional limitations is your strongest asset. Focusing on the specific vocational requirements of your case can help you navigate the hearing process more effectively.
Keep these details handy for your hearing day at the Springfield office, which processed 1,282 dispositions in the latest reporting period.
Springfield, MA
| Rank | Judge | Approval Rate | Full Approval | Total Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joshua Pinkus | 79% | 58% | 4,861 | |
| 2 | Edward T. Bauer | 65% | 59% | 21,794 | |
| 3 | Judith M. Stolfo | 62% | 53% | 7,775 | |
| 4 | Payam Danialzadeh | 59% | 47% | 3,577 | |
| 5 | Addison C. Masengill | 55% | 46% | 29,098 | |
| 6 | Michael P. Breton | 52% | 44% | 13,462 | |
| 7 | Victoria A. Ferrer | 50% | 43% | 19,284 | |
| 8 | Peter J. Martinelli | 47% | 40% | 8,660 | |
| 9 | Kim K. Griswold | 42% | 44% | 24,187 |
SSDI hearing approval rates — with a lawyer vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Applicants with a lawyer got approved at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation. Checking whether you qualify for a free benefits review takes 2 minutes.
Average months from hearing request to decision — last 16 months
Where to apply or check on your claim in person
About This Content
Statistics come from SSA's Office of Hearings Operations reports and publicly available judge decision data. Approval rates count both full and partial approvals. Wait times reflect the average from hearing request to decision.