SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Anthony J. Johnson

Last decided RichmondJul 2026
Decisions 276since 2026

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes. While Anthony J. Johnson has an approval rate of 59% on record since 2026, his latest-period approval rate is 59%, which sits 14 percentage points above the Richmond office's latest-period rate of 45%. These figures are based on 276 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2026
Approval rate 59%
Decisions on record 276
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Johnson Richmond National
Approval rate 59% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 46% — —
Denials 41% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Johnson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Johnson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2026, Anthony J. Johnson has maintained an approval rate of 59% across 276 decisions on record. The 2026 fiscal year-to-date data shows a consistent pattern of outcomes. This latest period reflects his established decision-making approach, showing a rate that is currently higher than the broader office average for the same timeframe.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Johnson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Richmond hearing office

The Richmond hearing office is the most recent office on record for 13 judges as of July 2026. The office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 45%, which provides context for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Richmond

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Richmond office. Approval rates for this bench range from 18% to 59% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions