SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Roy LaRoche

Last decided Oak ParkJul 2026
Decisions 373since 2026

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Roy LaRoche has an approval rate of 40% across his record since 2026, it is helpful to view this against the broader bench at the Oak Park hearing office, where judges range from 36% to 83%. Latest-period data shows the judge's rate at 40%, compared to the office rate of 66%, the state rate of 60%, and the national rate of 58%. These figures reflect recent trends rather than long-term averages.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2026
Approval rate 40%
Decisions on record 373
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge LaRoche Oak Park National
Approval rate 40% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 27% — —
Denials 60% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge LaRoche's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge LaRoche
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The data for Roy LaRoche covers 373 decisions on record since 2026. During the 2026 fiscal year to date, the approval rate has held at 40%. This figure is based on a partial year of data, which provides a snapshot of recent activity. Because these patterns can shift based on the specific evidence and medical documentation presented in each case, the latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge LaRoche's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Park hearing office

The Oak Park hearing office is the most recent office on record for Roy LaRoche, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves claimants across Michigan and is part of a regional network of hearing offices. With 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 66%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oak Park

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 19 judges whose most recent office on record is the Oak Park hearing office, and 9 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 36% to 83%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions