SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Roy LaRoche

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2026
Decisions 373 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data periods. While Roy LaRoche maintains a 40% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period approval rate of 40% sits 26 points below the Oak Park office average of 66%. These figures are drawn from 373 lifetime decisions, providing a statistically significant view of his courtroom record. These rates reflect historical trends rather than predictions for your specific hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2026
Approval rate 40%
Decisions on record 373
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge LaRoche Oak Park National
Approval rate 40% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 27%
Denials 60%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge LaRoche's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge LaRoche
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision pattern for Roy LaRoche is based on 373 lifetime decisions recorded since 2016. His approval rate has remained steady at 40% during the most recent reporting period. Because SSA case assignment is randomized through a workload-balancing algorithm, understanding this trend helps you and your representative focus on the specific evidentiary requirements of your claim. The latest data reflects a continuation of this established pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge LaRoche's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Park hearing office

The Oak Park hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for Social Security Disability Insurance hearings in Michigan. The office bench consists of 20 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 66%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. See the Oak Park hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Oak Park hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 36% to 83% on lifetime records. You can find more information on the office's general operations on the Oak Park hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions