SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jesus Ortis

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Nhc Baltimore Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 3,352 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's lifetime approval rate to current office and national benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. With 3,352 lifetime decisions, the data for Jesus Ortis offers a look at his decision-making history. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate was 67%, which stands 17 points above the current office average of 49%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Ortis Nhc Baltimore National
Approval rate 66% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 33%
Denials 33%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ortis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ortis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10-year tenure, Jesus Ortis has seen fluctuations in his approval patterns. While his lifetime rate is 66%, his yearly performance has varied. The latest reporting period shows a 67% approval rate, suggesting that his recent decisions remain consistent with his long-term average. These trends often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of medical evidence presented at hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ortis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Ortis? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nhc Baltimore hearing office

The NHC Baltimore Hearing Office serves you throughout the Maryland region, managing a high volume of disability appeals. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 49%. You should be prepared for a formal administrative process where documentation is key. You can see the NHC Baltimore Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the NHC Baltimore Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 46% to 81%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your own medical evidence is the most effective strategy. You can find more information on the office's general operations on the NHC Baltimore Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions