You face a 44% approval rate at the Topeka office, which is below the national average for hearing-stage outcomes. With wait times trending upward to 8 months, you have a clear runway to build a robust medical record. Because the panel of 9 judges shows a moderate spread in approval rates, your success depends on presenting evidence that addresses the specific limitations an ALJ will weigh. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet these standards.
Who decides cases at this office
The 9 judges at the Topeka office show a moderate spread in their approval rates, which range from 24% to 60%. Because cases are assigned randomly, you cannot choose your judge, and each one weighs evidence differently. This variation means your file must be strong enough to stand on its own merits regardless of which ALJ is assigned to your hearing.
| Rank | Judge | Approval Rate | Total Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pearline Hardy | 60% | 2,373 | |
| 2 | Robert J. Burbank | 55% | 1,211 | |
| 3 | LaSandra Morrison | 50% | 835 | |
| 4 | Lauren K. Tran | 44% | 1,272 | |
| 5 | Michael D. Mance | 42% | 2,254 | |
| 6 | Michael D. Burrichter | 37% | 3,607 | |
| 7 | Scott Johnson | 35% | 3,844 | |
| 8 | Timothy G. Stueve | 29% | 1,161 | |
| 9 | Michael D. Shilling | 24% | 2,242 |
How long you'll wait
At Topeka, the average wait from hearing request to written decision is 8 months— versus a national average of 8 months. Here's how it's tracked month by month over the past 16 months.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Going to your hearing
Your hearing is a formal proceeding where an Administrative Law Judge reviews the evidence that led to your initial denial. With an 8-month wait, you have time to update your medical records, which is the most effective way to improve your outcome. Bring a current list of medications, including documented side effects, and a daily-activity log that highlights how your condition limits your ability to work. During the hearing, a Vocational Expert will often testify about whether jobs exist for someone with your specific restrictions. You have the right to question this expert, as their testimony is frequently the deciding factor in your case. Ensure all new evidence is submitted well before the deadline, as last-minute additions are restricted.
When a panel's approval rates span 36 points, your file must be strong enough that no judge can dismiss it on weak documentation. An attorney who understands the Topeka panel can help you anticipate the specific questions a judge might ask and prepare your testimony to address those concerns. A well-prepared case is your best defense against the uncertainty of the hearing process.
Topeka SSA Hearing Office
Suite A, 3712 SW Burlingame
Topeka, KS
66609
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
View on SSA.govField offices that route cases here
If your hearing is at Topeka, your case originated at one of the SSA field offices below — the local intake counter where you (or a representative) filed the initial application. Field offices don't decide hearings, but they hold your file, issue benefit-payment notices, and field the day-to-day questions during your wait.
Frequently asked questions
The average wait for a hearing at this office is 8 months. This wait time has been trending upward recently, providing you with more time to work with an attorney to strengthen your medical file.
ALJs are assigned to cases randomly at this office. Because the panel of 9 judges has a moderate spread in approval rates, an attorney can help you prepare for the different ways each judge may evaluate your evidence.
You generally cannot choose your judge. However, if you believe there is a conflict of interest, an attorney can help you file a formal request for a change of judge.
While you are not required to have an attorney, the hearing stage is complex and involves testifying under oath. An attorney can help you ensure your medical evidence is properly presented to the judge.



