With an allowance rate of 64%, the Billings office approves cases at a rate consistent with national norms. The panel of 8 judges shows a wide spread in outcomes, ranging from 31% to 77%. Because your specific judge influences your result, your best strategy is to build a comprehensive medical record that leaves little room for interpretation. An attorney can help you organize this evidence before your hearing date.
Heading to an ALJ hearing? Get a free case review to prepare for your hearing.
Check My BenefitsPreparing for Your Hearing
Your 9-month wait is an opportunity to refine the evidence presented to the ALJ. Start by gathering all medical records generated since your initial denial, as these are the most critical pieces of evidence. Prepare a detailed log of your daily activities and a list of side effects from your medications. During your hearing, a Vocational Expert will likely testify about jobs that fit your physical or mental limitations. You and your attorney will have the chance to question this expert to clarify why your specific impairments prevent you from maintaining gainful employment. Ensure all evidence is submitted well before the deadline, as last-minute additions are restricted. A final decision will arrive by mail after the hearing concludes.
The Judges at This Office
The Billings panel features a wide spread in allowance rates, meaning the judge you draw can impact your outcome. With rates ranging from 31% to 77%, the panel does not rule with uniform consistency. Because cases are assigned randomly, you cannot choose your judge, but you can prepare for the possibility of drawing a more stringent one by ensuring your medical documentation is airtight.
Why Representation Matters at the Hearing Stage
When a panel's allowance rates span 46 points, your file must be strong enough that no judge can dismiss it on weak documentation. Many claimants spend their 9-month wait simply hoping for a favorable outcome, but a qualified attorney uses that time to pressure-test your file against the specific standards of the Social Security Administration. By identifying gaps in your medical record early, you can enter your hearing with a strategy designed to survive the scrutiny of any judge on the panel.
About This Hearing Office
Use these details to coordinate your travel and ensure you arrive on time for your scheduled hearing.
Most Favorable Judges
Billings, MT
| Rank | Judge | Approval Rate | Full Approval | Total Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jessica H. Pugrud | 70% | 60% | 2,856 | |
| 2 | Tanya Dvarishkis | 69% | 56% | 26,137 | |
| 3 | John C. Arkoosh | 64% | 54% | 6,365 | |
| 4 | John Kays | 63% | 67% | 30,485 | |
| 5 | Richard A. Opp | 62% | 53% | 12,619 | |
| 6 | Brian J. Henry | 55% | 59% | 5,570 | |
| 7 | Russell B. Wolff | 52% | 44% | 2,576 | |
| 8 | Luke A. Brennan | 51% | 54% | 31,810 | |
| 9 | Stephen Marchioro | 45% | 38% | 22,742 | |
| 10 | Michael A. Kilroy | 45% | 38% | 18,230 | |
| 11 | Michele M. Kelley | 32% | 27% | 19,943 | |
| 12 | Lloyd E. Hartford | 32% | 27% | 3,890 | |
| 13 | Christopher R. Inama | 31% | 26% | 14,703 | |
| 14 | Henry Kramzyk | 31% | 27% | 24,220 |
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — with a lawyer vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Applicants with a lawyer got approved at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation. Checking whether you qualify for a free benefits review takes 2 minutes.
Wait Time Trend
Average months from hearing request to decision — last 16 months
Nearest SSA Field Offices
Where to apply or check on your claim in person
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Content
Statistics come from SSA's Office of Hearings Operations reports and publicly available judge decision data. Approval rates count both full and partial approvals. Wait times reflect the average from hearing request to decision.