With an allowance rate of 59%, Charleston is typical for hearing outcomes, meaning your success depends on the quality of your medical evidence. While the 7-month wait is faster than the national average, the wide spread in judge allowance rates—ranging from 37% to 78%—makes thorough preparation essential to ensure your file is ready regardless of which judge you draw. An attorney can help you navigate these variables and strengthen your case.
Hearings at the Charleston office involve you testifying under oath before an ALJ. Because the panel's allowance rates vary significantly, your file must be prepared before you enter the room. You should bring updated medical records, a detailed log of your daily activities, and a list of all medications including their side effects. A vocational expert will often testify to determine if jobs exist that fit your specific physical or mental limitations. You have the right to question this expert, which is often a critical moment of the proceeding. Ensure all evidence is submitted well before the deadline, as last-minute additions are restricted.
The seven judges at this office display a wide spread in their allowance rates, with outcomes ranging from 37% to 78%. Because cases are assigned randomly, you cannot choose your judge, and each one weighs evidence differently. This variation means your legal strategy must be robust enough to satisfy the requirements of any judge on the panel.
When a panel's allowance rates span over 40 points, your file must be strong enough that no judge can dismiss it on weak documentation. Many claimants assume the hearing is a simple conversation, but the reality involves complex questions from a vocational expert that can derail a claim if you are unprepared. Understanding the tendencies of the Charleston panel allows you to anticipate these challenges and refine your testimony.
With 2,061 dispositions processed recently, this office is a high-volume hub for West Virginia claimants; keep these details handy for your hearing day.
Charleston, WV
| Rank | Judge | Approval Rate | Full Approval | Total Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Valerie A. Bawolek | 79% | 70% | 30,162 | |
| 2 | Jon K. Johnson | 75% | 64% | 12,547 | |
| 3 | Toby J. Buel Sr. | 71% | 76% | 32,814 | |
| 4 | M. D. Crislip | 66% | 67% | 30,005 | |
| 5 | Sabrina M. Tilley | 64% | 54% | 17,484 | |
| 6 | William R. Paxton | 62% | 53% | 7,714 | |
| 7 | Christopher Galloway | 59% | 47% | 5,073 | |
| 8 | Breinne A. Mullins | 54% | 41% | 4,456 | |
| 9 | Francine A. Serafin | 45% | 36% | 19,042 | |
| 10 | Nathan Brown | 39% | 33% | 18,499 |
SSDI hearing approval rates — with a lawyer vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Applicants with a lawyer got approved at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation. Checking whether you qualify for a free benefits review takes 2 minutes.
Average months from hearing request to decision — last 16 months
Where to apply or check on your claim in person
About This Content
Statistics come from SSA's Office of Hearings Operations reports and publicly available judge decision data. Approval rates count both full and partial approvals. Wait times reflect the average from hearing request to decision.