SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brian Lucas

Last decided NHC ChicagoJul 2026
Decisions 3,304since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure a fair assessment of activity. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Brian Lucas decided 420 cases. This data is compared against the NHC Chicago office, state, and national averages for the same period. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting outcomes for your specific hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Lucas NHC Chicago National
Approval rate 59% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 54% — —
Denials 41% — —
Decisions 420 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 3,304

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lucas's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lucas
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Brian Lucas has issued 3,304 decisions. His yearly approval trend has fluctuated, with his most recent 12-month approval rate of 59% differing from his 52% average since 2016. These fluctuations reflect the evolving nature of his docket rather than a fixed decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lucas's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Chicago hearing office

NHC Chicago is the most recent office on record for Brian Lucas, with his last recorded decision there in July 2026. The bench includes 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with the office maintaining a 54% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. You can visit the NHC Chicago hearing office page to view the full roster of judges.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Chicago

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your judge is assigned randomly. Across the NHC Chicago office, approval rates vary among the 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Among the 9 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 17% to 88% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Lucas's 59%. All five last decided cases in Illinois.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Lucas and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions