Thomas M. Muth's most recent office on record is the Mobile hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 266 decisions on record since 2026, 77% have been approved. Because case assignment is random, the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
When evaluating your hearing, it is helpful to compare your judge's performance against the broader bench. Thomas M. Muth maintains an approval rate of 77% since 2026, which sits within the range of 28% to 81% observed among the 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Mobile hearing office. In the latest reporting period, his 77% approval rate compares to the office rate of 75%, the state rate of 62%, and the national rate of 58%.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Muth's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The data for Thomas M. Muth covers 266 decisions on record since 2026. During this period, his approval rate has been 77%. This figure reflects his historical evaluation of disability claims. The latest period shows a continuation of this pattern.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Muth's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Mobile hearing office
Thomas M. Muth's most recent office on record is the Mobile hearing office. This office features a bench of 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 75%.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Mobile
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Mobile hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary, ranging from 28% to 81% on their since-2016 records.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Thomas M. Muth has an approval rate of 77% since 2026. This places him within the 28% to 81% range of approval rates for the 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Mobile hearing office. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this bench.
The approval rate for Thomas M. Muth has been 77% across his 266 decisions on record since 2026. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating disability evidence. If you are concerned about your hearing, an attorney can help you understand how your evidence fits this pattern.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because you cannot choose your judge, an attorney can help you prepare a strong case that is ready for any ALJ.
An approval rate is a summary of past decisions, not a prediction for your specific hearing. While Thomas M. Muth has approved 77% of cases on record since 2026, your outcome depends on the medical evidence and testimony you present. An attorney can help you ensure your file is complete and persuasive.




