SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Plauche F. Villere

Last decided SacramentoJul 2026
Decisions 420since 2026

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Plauche F. Villere maintains an 80% approval rate across 420 decisions on record since 2026. When evaluating this against the broader bench, judges whose most recent office on record is this one show a wide range of outcomes, from 39% to 80%. These figures provide context for the local hearing environment, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2026
Approval rate 80%
Decisions on record 420
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Villere Sacramento National
Approval rate 80% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 73% — —
Denials 20% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Villere's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Villere
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Plauche F. Villere stands at 80% based on 420 decisions on record since 2026. During the 2026 fiscal year to date, the judge has maintained this 80% approval rate. Because SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, this trend provides a baseline for understanding the judge's historical activity rather than a guarantee of your future results.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Villere's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Sacramento hearing office

Plauche F. Villere's most recent office on record is the Sacramento hearing office, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across the region, supported by a bench of 20 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 68%, which provides a local benchmark for your hearing process.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Sacramento

SSA assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the specific judge assigned to your case is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 39% to 80% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions