SSA Hearing Office

Tupelo Hearing Office

8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

Call

Tupelo maintains a 67% allowance rate, which is high for a hearing office. With a steady 7-month wait time, you have a predictable window to organize your medical records. Because the local panel of judges maintains a tight allowance spread, your success depends heavily on the quality of evidence you present. An attorney can help you prepare your case to ensure your medical records are complete before your hearing date.

Heading to an ALJ hearing? Get a free case review to prepare for your hearing.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

Preparing for Your Hearing

Hearings at this office move faster than the national norm, so you must submit all new medical records well before your scheduled date. You will typically spend time before an ALJ, where you may be questioned about your daily limitations and work history. A vocational expert often testifies to identify jobs that fit your physical or mental restrictions, and you can challenge these findings. Ensure your medication list is current and includes documented side effects, as these details often influence the judge's assessment of your ability to perform sustained work. Decisions are rarely issued on the spot; you will receive a written notice by mail several weeks after the hearing concludes.

The Judges at This Office

The panel of 6 judges at this office operates with a tight allowance spread, with rates clustering between 58% and 72%. Because the judges here show consistent patterns in how they weigh evidence, you can expect a similar standard of review regardless of which judge is assigned to your case. While this consistency is helpful, remember that every case is unique and random assignment means your specific medical documentation remains the most important factor.

Why Representation Matters at the Hearing Stage

Even at an office with a 67% allowance rate, the difference between an approval and a denial often comes down to how effectively your evidence counters the vocational expert's testimony. When you have a 7-month window before your hearing, you can use that time to bridge gaps in your medical record that the SSA may have overlooked. A strong file is your best defense against a denial, regardless of which judge sits on the bench.

About This Hearing Office

Keep these details handy for your hearing date at the office located on South Green Street.

Most Favorable Judges

Tupelo, MS

Approval Rate
64%
Full Approval
63%
Total Decisions
21,699
Approval Rate
64%
Full Approval
62%
Total Decisions
25,442
Approval Rate
60%
Full Approval
44%
Total Decisions
24,850
Approval Rate
59%
Full Approval
65%
Total Decisions
29,339
Approval Rate
57%
Full Approval
58%
Total Decisions
25,875
Approval Rate
19%
Full Approval
16%
Total Decisions
12,909
Rank Judge Approval Rate Full Approval Total Decisions
1Shannon Mashburn 64% 63% 21,699
2Gregory A. Maddox 64% 62% 25,442
3Michael DePrimo 60% 44% 24,850
4H.J. Barkley III 59% 65% 29,339
5Roger Lott 57% 58% 25,875
6James F. Prothro 19% 16% 12,909

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — with a lawyer vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Applicants without a lawyer
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Applicants with a lawyer
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Applicants with a lawyer got approved at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation. Checking whether you qualify for a free benefits review takes 2 minutes.

Wait Time Trend

Average months from hearing request to decision — last 16 months

Wait (months)
02468Jun '24Sep '25

Frequently Asked Questions

About This Content

Statistics come from SSA's Office of Hearings Operations reports and publicly available judge decision data. Approval rates count both full and partial approvals. Wait times reflect the average from hearing request to decision.