SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Peter Kafkas

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,395 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Peter Kafkas reflect a career-long record of 51% across 3,395 total decisions. In the latest reporting period, his 49% approval rate sits 14 points below the St Petersburg FL OHO office average of 63%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding his historical decision-making patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 3,395
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kafkas St Petersburg Fl OHO National
Approval rate 49% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 40%
Denials 51%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kafkas's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kafkas
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the decision pattern for Peter Kafkas has shown yearly fluctuations. After a period of lower approval rates in the early years of the record, the trend moved toward a more consistent mid-range frequency, reaching 59% in 2025 before shifting to 49% in the most recent reporting period. This latest data point represents a return toward his lifetime average of 51%. The recent shift may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality presented at your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kafkas's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Petersburg Fl OHO hearing office

The St Petersburg FL OHO serves you across the Florida region, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. With 17 judges on record, this office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 63%. You can expect a formal hearing process where your evidence and medical documentation are reviewed to determine your eligibility. You can see the St Petersburg FL OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom reported in the latest period. The lifetime approval rates for these judges range from 35% to 85%, highlighting the variance found across the office's bench. You can find the full ALJ roster on the St Petersburg FL OHO hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions