SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert A. Kelly

Last decided Kansas CityJul 2026
Decisions 3,663since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When evaluating your hearing, it is helpful to look at how a judge's approval rate compares to their peers. The 33% approval rate for Robert A. Kelly is based on a significant volume of cases, providing a stable look at his decision-making history. The 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Kansas City hearing office range from 33% to 77% in their approval rates. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 33%
Decisions on record 3,663
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kelly Kansas City National
Approval rate 25% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 20% — —
Denials 75% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kelly's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kelly
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Robert A. Kelly has shown variation since his record began in 2016. After an initial period with a higher approval rate, the trend has shifted, with the most recent data showing an approval rate of 25% in the latest reporting period. This latest figure sits 31 percentage points lower than the 56% approval rate seen across the Kansas City office during the same timeframe. These fluctuations often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the specific evidence presented in each hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kelly's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Kansas City hearing office

The Kansas City hearing office is the most recent office on record for Robert A. Kelly, with his last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 17 judges who handle a wide variety of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 56%, providing a benchmark for the local area.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Kansas City

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Kansas City hearing office, and 12 of them decided cases there in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 77% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions