With an allowance rate of 51%, Norfolk sits squarely in the middle of national performance trends, meaning your outcome depends heavily on the quality of your medical evidence. The wait time has been trending downward, recently hitting 8.5 months. Because the panel of judges is tight, with most allowance rates clustered near the median, your best strategy is to focus on a rigorous, evidence-backed presentation that leaves little room for ambiguity. An attorney can help you prepare your case for the hearing.
Your hearing will likely last about an hour, during which an ALJ will review your file and hear testimony. You should arrive with updated medical records covering the period since your initial denial, as this is the most critical evidence for your claim. Bring a detailed log of your daily activities and a list of your medications, including specific side effects that impact your ability to work. A vocational expert will often be present to testify about whether jobs exist for someone with your specific limitations. You will have the opportunity to question this expert. All new evidence must be submitted well before the hearing date, as last-minute additions are restricted. A final decision will arrive by mail in the weeks following the proceeding.
The panel of 6 judges at this office is consistent, with allowance rates clustered between 42% and 60%. Because the judges here operate within a narrow band, you can expect a similar standard of evidence regardless of which judge is assigned to your case. While random assignment is the rule, each judge weighs testimony differently, so your file must be prepared to meet high evidentiary standards.
Hearings at this office move faster than they did earlier this year, leaving less time to correct gaps in your medical record. Cases that fail at this stage often do so because you did not adequately challenge the vocational expert's assumptions about available work. Identifying these vulnerabilities early helps you build a record that stands up to scrutiny.
Keep these details handy for your hearing day at the Norfolk office.
Norfolk, VA
| Rank | Judge | Approval Rate | Full Approval | Total Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kerith Cohen | 56% | 48% | 14,453 | |
| 2 | Chad Gendreau | 55% | 42% | 24,035 | |
| 3 | O. P. Dodson | 54% | 46% | 18,242 | |
| 4 | Jeffrey M. Jordan | 54% | 38% | 28,316 | |
| 5 | William Pflugrath | 54% | 52% | 18,581 | |
| 6 | Stewart Goldstein | 53% | 45% | 8,900 | |
| 7 | Maryann S. Bright | 51% | 29% | 26,093 | |
| 8 | Monica L. Flynn | 50% | 46% | 14,611 | |
| 9 | William T. Vest Jr. | 49% | 42% | 9,589 | |
| 10 | Carol Matula | 49% | 36% | 24,230 | |
| 11 | Irving A. Pianin | 48% | 41% | 10,985 |
SSDI hearing approval rates — with a lawyer vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Applicants with a lawyer got approved at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation. Checking whether you qualify for a free benefits review takes 2 minutes.
Average months from hearing request to decision — last 16 months
Where to apply or check on your claim in person
About This Content
Statistics come from SSA's Office of Hearings Operations reports and publicly available judge decision data. Approval rates count both full and partial approvals. Wait times reflect the average from hearing request to decision.