All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 21 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.

Showing 2001–2048 of 2048 judges
Most Recent Office
SEATTLE, WALast decision Sep 2019
Approval Rate
21%
Decisions
600
Most Recent Office
NEWARK, NJLast decision Jul 2026
Approval Rate
20%
Decisions
2,540
Most Recent Office
SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Jul 2026
Approval Rate
20%
Decisions
3,913
Most Recent Office
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Sep 2019
Approval Rate
20%
Decisions
730
Most Recent Office
SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Sep 2021
Approval Rate
20%
Decisions
1,672
2006 Joan Ho
Most Recent Office
ORANGE, CALast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
19%
Decisions
330
Most Recent Office
TUPELO, MSLast decision Sep 2019
Approval Rate
19%
Decisions
1,678
Most Recent Office
SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Sep 2022
Approval Rate
18%
Decisions
1,466
Most Recent Office
RICHMOND, VALast decision Jul 2026
Approval Rate
18%
Decisions
3,119
Most Recent Office
CHARLESTON SC, SCLast decision Jul 2026
Approval Rate
17%
Decisions
2,616
Most Recent Office
HARRISBURG, PALast decision Sep 2024
Approval Rate
17%
Decisions
1,337
Most Recent Office
CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Jul 2026
Approval Rate
17%
Decisions
2,863
Most Recent Office
KNOXVILLE, TNLast decision Jul 2026
Approval Rate
13%
Decisions
2,759
Most Recent Office
JOHNSTOWN, PALast decision Jul 2026
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
13
Most Recent Office
DOVER, DELast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
84
Most Recent Office
KNOXVILLE, TNLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
97
Most Recent Office
RENO NV, NVLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
77
Most Recent Office
FORT MYERS FL, FLLast decision Sep 2017
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
99
Most Recent Office
FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Sep 2017
Approval Rate
87%
Decisions
95
2020 W. Clark
Most Recent Office
BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2017
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
81
Most Recent Office
QUEENS, NYLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
66
Most Recent Office
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CALast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
85
Most Recent Office
LANSING, MILast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
98
Most Recent Office
PEORIA, ILLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
84
Most Recent Office
COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
85
Most Recent Office
NEWARK, NJLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
79
Most Recent Office
SAVANNAH, GALast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
49
Most Recent Office
CHARLESTON SC, SCLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
57
Most Recent Office
CHICAGO, ILLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
51
Most Recent Office
SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Jul 2026
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
7
Most Recent Office
DENVER, COLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
58
Most Recent Office
QUEENS, NYLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
73
Most Recent Office
OAK BROOK, ILLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
66
Most Recent Office
EUGENE, ORLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
82
Most Recent Office
PITTSBURGH, PALast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
83
Most Recent Office
MIAMI, FLLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
61
Most Recent Office
LOUISVILLE, KYLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
49
Most Recent Office
BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
62
Most Recent Office
COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
81
Most Recent Office
LOUISVILLE, KYLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
83
Most Recent Office
BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
52
Most Recent Office
FLINT, MILast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
70
Most Recent Office
DETROIT, MILast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
25%
Decisions
55
Most Recent Office
HOUSTON-BISSONNET, TXLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
8%
Decisions
334
Most Recent Office
DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
58
Most Recent Office
BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
67
Most Recent Office
NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Jul 2026
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
60
Most Recent Office
TULSA, OKLast decision Sep 2016
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
93
Rank Judge Most Recent Office Approval Rate Decisions
2001Tom L. Morris SEATTLE, WALast decision Sep 2019 21%600
2002Peter R. Lee NEWARK, NJLast decision Jul 2026 20%2,540
2003Gordan Momcilovic SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 20%3,913
2004Mark A. O'Hara CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Sep 2019 20%730
2005Susan Whittington SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Sep 2021 20%1,672
2006Joan Ho ORANGE, CALast decision Sep 2016 19%330
2007James F. Prothro TUPELO, MSLast decision Sep 2019 19%1,678
2008Jonathan P. Blucher SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Sep 2022 18%1,466
2009Suzette Knight RICHMOND, VALast decision Jul 2026 18%3,119
2010Tammy Georgian CHARLESTON SC, SCLast decision Jul 2026 17%2,616
2011Gwendolyn M. Hoover HARRISBURG, PALast decision Sep 2024 17%1,337
2012Catherine Ma CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Jul 2026 17%2,863
2013Joyce Francis KNOXVILLE, TNLast decision Jul 2026 13%2,759
2014Robert Baker JOHNSTOWN, PALast decision Jul 2026 62%13
2015Edward J. Banas DOVER, DELast decision Sep 2016 70%84
2016John R. Barker KNOXVILLE, TNLast decision Sep 2016 77%97
2017Eileen Burlison RENO NV, NVLast decision Sep 2016 27%77
2018Larry J. Butler FORT MYERS FL, FLLast decision Sep 2017 38%99
2019Mary Chrzanowski FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Sep 2017 87%95
2020W. Clark BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2017 42%81
2021Michael D. Cofresi QUEENS, NYLast decision Sep 2016 67%66
2022Jan Donsbach LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CALast decision Sep 2016 60%85
2023Thomas L. English LANSING, MILast decision Sep 2016 52%98
2024Diane R. Flebbe PEORIA, ILLast decision Sep 2016 32%84
2025K. Michael Foley COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Sep 2016 54%85
2026John Giannopoulos NEWARK, NJLast decision Sep 2016 27%79
2027Morton J. Gold Jr. SAVANNAH, GALast decision Sep 2016 41%49
2028Roseanne P. Gudzan CHARLESTON SC, SCLast decision Sep 2016 51%57
2029Percival Harmon CHICAGO, ILLast decision Sep 2016 45%51
2030Laura Speck Havens SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Jul 2026 57%7
2031Michael G. Heitz DENVER, COLast decision Sep 2016 43%58
2032Marilyn P. Hoppenfeld QUEENS, NYLast decision Sep 2016 74%73
2033James A. Horn OAK BROOK, ILLast decision Sep 2016 64%66
2034Alex S. Karlin EUGENE, ORLast decision Sep 2016 32%82
2035David J. Kozma PITTSBURGH, PALast decision Sep 2016 69%83
2036Linda E. Kupersmith MIAMI, FLLast decision Sep 2016 43%61
2037Roland D. Mather LOUISVILLE, KYLast decision Sep 2016 69%49
2038Bruce R. Mazzarella BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2016 52%62
2039John R. Montgomery COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Sep 2016 51%81
2040Michael J. Nichols LOUISVILLE, KYLast decision Sep 2016 43%83
2041Jack F. Ostrander BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2016 44%52
2042John A. Ransom FLINT, MILast decision Sep 2016 81%70
2043Ethel Revels DETROIT, MILast decision Sep 2016 25%55
2044Susan J. Soddy HOUSTON-BISSONNET, TXLast decision Sep 2016 8%334
2045Sharon L. Steckler DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Sep 2016 43%58
2046David L. Stephens BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2016 66%67
2047Louis J. Volz NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Jul 2026 85%60
2048Edmund C. Werre TULSA, OKLast decision Sep 2016 58%93

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).