All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 21 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 2001–2044 of 2044 judges
2001 Joan Ho
Office
Approval Rate
19%
Decisions
330
Office
Approval Rate
19%
Decisions
1,678
Approval Rate
18%
Decisions
1,466
Office
Approval Rate
18%
Decisions
3,119
Approval Rate
17%
Decisions
2,616
Approval Rate
17%
Decisions
1,337
Approval Rate
17%
Decisions
2,863
Approval Rate
13%
Decisions
2,759
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
13
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
84
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
97
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
15
Office
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
77
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
99
Approval Rate
87%
Decisions
95
2016 W. Clark
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
81
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
66
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
85
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
98
Office
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
84
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
85
Office
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
79
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
49
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
57
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
51
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
7
Office
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
58
Office
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
73
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
66
Office
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
82
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
83
Office
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
61
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
49
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
62
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
81
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
83
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
52
Office
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
70
Office
Approval Rate
25%
Decisions
55
Approval Rate
8%
Decisions
334
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
58
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
67
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
60
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
93
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
2001Joan Ho ORANGE, CA 19%330
2002James F. Prothro TUPELO, MS 19%1,678
2003Jonathan P. Blucher SAN ANTONIO, TX 18%1,466
2004Suzette Knight RICHMOND, VA 18%3,119
2005Tammy Georgian CHARLESTON SC, SC 17%2,616
2006Gwendolyn M. Hoover HARRISBURG, PA 17%1,337
2007Catherine Ma CLEVELAND, OH 17%2,863
2008Joyce Francis KNOXVILLE, TN 13%2,759
2009Robert Baker JOHNSTOWN, PA 62%13
2010Edward J. Banas DOVER, DE 70%84
2011John R. Barker KNOXVILLE, TN 77%97
2012Amy Benton ELKINS PARK, PA 33%15
2013Eileen Burlison RENO NV, NV 27%77
2014Larry J. Butler FORT MYERS FL, FL 38%99
2015Mary Chrzanowski FT LAUDERDALE, FL 87%95
2016W. Clark BALTIMORE, MD 42%81
2017Michael D. Cofresi QUEENS, NY 67%66
2018Jan Donsbach LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CA 60%85
2019Thomas L. English LANSING, MI 52%98
2020Diane R. Flebbe PEORIA, IL 32%84
2021K. Michael Foley COLUMBUS, OH 54%85
2022John Giannopoulos NEWARK, NJ 27%79
2023Morton J. Gold Jr. SAVANNAH, GA 41%49
2024Roseanne P. Gudzan CHARLESTON SC, SC 51%57
2025Percival Harmon CHICAGO, IL 45%51
2026Laura Speck Havens SACRAMENTO, CA 57%7
2027Michael G. Heitz DENVER, CO 43%58
2028Marilyn P. Hoppenfeld QUEENS, NY 74%73
2029James A. Horn OAK BROOK, IL 64%66
2030Alex S. Karlin EUGENE, OR 32%82
2031David J. Kozma PITTSBURGH, PA 69%83
2032Linda E. Kupersmith MIAMI, FL 43%61
2033Roland D. Mather LOUISVILLE, KY 69%49
2034Bruce R. Mazzarella BUFFALO, NY 52%62
2035John R. Montgomery COLUMBUS, OH 51%81
2036Michael J. Nichols LOUISVILLE, KY 43%83
2037Jack F. Ostrander BIRMINGHAM, AL 44%52
2038John A. Ransom FLINT, MI 81%70
2039Ethel Revels DETROIT, MI 25%55
2040Susan J. Soddy HOUSTON-BISSONNET, TX 8%334
2041Sharon L. Steckler DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 43%58
2042David L. Stephens BIRMINGHAM, AL 66%67
2043Louis J. Volz NEW ORLEANS, LA 85%60
2044Edmund C. Werre TULSA, OK 58%93

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).