All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 11 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1001–1100 of 2044 judges
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,315
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
4,242
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
4,038
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
877
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
4,884
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,443
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,025
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
707
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,209
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,081
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,500
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,580
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,775
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,053
1015 John Noel
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,988
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,533
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,035
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
184
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,132
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,505
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,758
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,148
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,910
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,813
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,680
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,902
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
441
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,167
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,804
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,982
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,024
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,418
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,428
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,771
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,613
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,264
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,481
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,423
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
530
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,042
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
4,499
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,089
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,121
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,749
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,723
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,912
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,351
1048 Mark Dowd
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
686
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,914
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,168
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
207
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,535
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,086
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,111
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,509
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,909
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
4,090
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,742
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,541
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,451
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,786
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,104
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,683
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,998
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,906
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,611
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,596
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,600
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,556
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
4,660
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,736
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,071
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
1,084
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,308
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,965
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,803
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,308
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,180
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
4,536
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,359
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,076
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,676
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,436
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,835
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
4,177
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,179
Office
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,793
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
3,187
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
2,402
Approval Rate
54%
Decisions
4,492
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
976
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,242
1093 Jim Beeby
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
4,017
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,331
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,134
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,289
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,598
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,556
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
4,056
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
354
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1001Evelyn M. Gunn LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CA 55%2,315
1002Cynthia S. Harmon GRAND RAPIDS, MI 55%4,242
1003Robert Hodum MEMPHIS, TN 55%4,038
1004Brien Horan NEW HAVEN, CT 55%877
1005Bill Jones FORT SMITH, AR 55%4,884
1006Kelli J. Kleeb SEVEN FIELDS, PA 55%3,443
1007Michael J. Kopicki NHC BALTIMORE, MD 55%2,025
1008Joan A. Lawrence KNOXVILLE, TN 55%707
1009James Linehan OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 55%3,209
1010Daniel Luker PEORIA, IL 55%1,081
1011Linda Marshall LITTLE ROCK, AR 55%2,500
1012Timothy M. McGuan BUFFALO, NY 55%1,580
1013Jennie L. McLean OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 55%1,775
1014Matt Midles SAN FRANCISCO, CA 55%1,053
1015John Noel HARTFORD, CT 55%3,988
1016William Pflugrath NORFOLK, VA 55%2,533
1017Nancy M. Pizzo NEW ORLEANS, LA 55%3,035
1018John H. Pleuss MADISON, WI 55%184
1019John A. Pottinger KINGSPORT, TN 55%3,132
1020Erin Powers JOHNSTOWN, PA 55%1,505
1021C. H. Prinsloo SEATTLE, WA 55%2,758
1022Lori Romeo NEW YORK, NY 55%2,148
1023Susan Smoot AKRON OH, OH 55%2,910
1024Andrew J. Soltes Jr. ALBANY, NY 55%2,813
1025Robert F. Spaulding EUGENE, OR 55%1,680
1026Chris Stuber FARGO, ND 55%3,902
1027Patrick J. Toal MILWAUKEE, WI 55%441
1028Alexander Weir III LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CA 55%3,167
1029Brooke Werner McEckron COVINGTON GA, GA 55%2,804
1030Eric Westley CLEVELAND, OH 55%3,982
1031T. Whitaker INDIANAPOLIS, IN 55%2,024
1032Katherine D. Wisz RALEIGH, NC 55%3,418
1033Wanda L. Wright RALEIGH, NC 55%3,428
1034Richard Zack WILKES BARRE, PA 55%1,771
1035Stuart Adkins DAYTON, OH 54%2,613
1036Kyle E. Andeer SANTA BARBARA, CA 54%1,264
1037Josephine Arno MORENO VALLEY, CA 54%3,481
1038Betty Roberts Barbeito SAN JOSE, CA 54%1,423
1039Eugene Bond WASHINGTON, DC 54%530
1040Shawn Bozarth HARRISBURG, PA 54%3,042
1041David R. Bruce ORLAND PARK, IL 54%4,499
1042Theodore Burock HARRISBURG, PA 54%2,089
1043Anthony Capece GREENVILLE, SC 54%1,121
1044Mark R. Dawson DENVER, CO 54%1,749
1045Kevin J. Detherage ORLANDO, FL 54%3,723
1046James Dixon KNOXVILLE, TN 54%3,912
1047O. P. Dodson NORFOLK, VA 54%2,351
1048Mark Dowd KNOXVILLE, TN 54%686
1049Elizabeth B. Dunlap DALLAS NORTH, TX 54%1,914
1050Jennifer M. Fellabaum ALBUQUERQUE, NM 54%3,168
1051Cheri L. Filion SEATTLE, WA 54%207
1052Nicole S. Forbes-Schmitt CHARLESTON SC, SC 54%3,535
1053Brian J. Henry BILLINGS, MT 54%1,086
1054Jeffrey N. Holappa DENVER, CO 54%3,111
1055JuanCarlos Hunt NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 54%1,509
1056Monica D. Jackson BIRMINGHAM, AL 54%2,909
1057Jeffrey M. Jordan NORFOLK, VA 54%4,090
1058Roxanne J. Kelsey SAN JOSE, CA 54%2,742
1059David Kurtz FLINT, MI 54%2,541
1060David Lacy PASADENA, CA 54%1,451
1061John B. Langland MONTGOMERY, AL 54%3,786
1062Jay E. Levine SAN DIEGO, CA 54%2,104
1063Addison C. Masengill SPRINGFIELD MA, MA 54%3,683
1064Elisabeth McGee FORT SMITH, AR 54%3,998
1065Larry A. Miller RALEIGH, NC 54%1,906
1066Margaret ODonnell FLINT, MI 54%2,611
1067Julie Petri GREENVILLE, SC 54%3,596
1068Dennis L. Pickett LOUISVILLE, KY 54%1,600
1069Nathaniel Plucker ST LOUIS, MO 54%2,556
1070John R. Price ST LOUIS, MO 54%4,660
1071Raymond Prybylski BRONX, NY 54%2,736
1072William Ramsey BOSTON, MA 54%2,071
1073Paul Reams MOBILE, AL 54%1,084
1074Laura Roberts FORT WORTH, TX 54%3,308
1075John W. Rolph NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NM 54%2,965
1076Christopher C. Sheppard LEXINGTON, KY 54%3,803
1077Beth Shillin NEWARK, NJ 54%2,308
1078Wendell M. Sims CHARLOTTE, NC 54%2,180
1079Anthony R. Smereka LIVONIA MI, MI 54%4,536
1080Anne V. Sprague ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 54%3,359
1081Patricia W. Supergan SHREVEPORT, LA 54%3,076
1082Stephen Thompson MACON, GA 54%3,676
1083Joel Tracy SAN BERNARDINO, CA 54%3,436
1084Flora L. Vinson COLUMBIA SC, SC 54%2,835
1085Kevin Vodak EVANSTON, IL 54%4,177
1086Eric Weiss ALBUQUERQUE, NM 54%2,179
1087Karen Wiedemann METAIRIE, LA 54%3,793
1088Donald J. Willy HOUSTON WEST, TX 54%3,187
1089George C. Yatron ELKINS PARK, PA 54%2,402
1090Jason R. Yoder EVANSVILLE, IN 54%4,492
1091Michelle L. Alexander NASHVILLE, TN 53%976
1092F. H. Ayer WASHINGTON, DC 53%3,242
1093Jim Beeby KNOXVILLE, TN 53%4,017
1094Curtis R. Boren ATLANTA NORTH, GA 53%2,331
1095Kevin Boucher MOBILE, AL 53%3,134
1096Salena D. Bowman-Davis NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NM 53%1,289
1097Michael P. Breton SPRINGFIELD MA, MA 53%1,598
1098Julie K. Bruntz WEST DES MOINES, IA 53%1,556
1099David G. Buell OMAHA, NE 53%4,056
1100James S. Carletti SAN DIEGO, CA 53%354

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).