All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 12 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1101–1200 of 2044 judges
1101 Eva Chan
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,243
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,074
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,357
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,136
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,299
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
4,220
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,401
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,687
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,324
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,043
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,127
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,574
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
4,659
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,143
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
401
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,494
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
942
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,078
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,633
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,992
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,778
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
518
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,219
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,671
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,749
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
933
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
4,195
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,600
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,132
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
678
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,011
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,258
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,792
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,447
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
864
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,013
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
805
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,677
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
584
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,381
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,281
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
5,051
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,323
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,464
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
4,292
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,463
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,062
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,289
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,798
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,527
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,939
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,565
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
4,496
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,573
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,838
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,898
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
3,411
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,686
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
2,487
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
1,616
Office
Approval Rate
53%
Decisions
122
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
1,694
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,252
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
4,001
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
348
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,057
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,584
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
995
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,686
1170 Dan Dane
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
184
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,394
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
1,561
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
1,992
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,824
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,129
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
1,115
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,708
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,117
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
4,414
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
133
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
487
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
4,622
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
290
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
1,488
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
1,130
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,876
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
4,103
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,221
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,316
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,254
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,483
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,937
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,002
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,265
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,067
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
306
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
498
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,103
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
1,277
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
600
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1101Eva Chan STOCKTON, CA 53%1,243
1102Ethan A. Chase CHARLESTON SC, SC 53%3,074
1103Marcus Christ CHARLESTON SC, SC 53%2,357
1104Christine A. Cooke KANSAS CITY, MO 53%3,136
1105Leonard F. Costa NEWARK, NJ 53%3,299
1106Boyce Crocker LEXINGTON, KY 53%4,220
1107Rowena E. DeLoach ALEXANDRIA, LA 53%1,401
1108Debra J. Denney DENVER, CO 53%3,687
1109Keith Dietterle SAN DIEGO, CA 53%1,324
1110Charles A. Dominick WILKES BARRE, PA 53%3,043
1111Angela Donaldson COVINGTON GA, GA 53%1,127
1112Brian Dougherty FRANKLIN TN, TN 53%3,574
1113Mark S. Ferguson LITTLE ROCK, AR 53%4,659
1114Mary Gattuso NEW ORLEANS, LA 53%1,143
1115Andrew Gollin CINCINNATI, OH 53%401
1116J. Dell Gordon OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 53%1,494
1117Tonya Green SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 53%942
1118Don A. Harper SAN ANTONIO, TX 53%2,078
1119Mattie Harvin-Woode ST LOUIS, MO 53%1,633
1120Daniel G. Heely STOCKTON, CA 53%1,992
1121David Herman TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FL 53%3,778
1122Maria Herrero-Jaarsma BUFFALO, NY 53%518
1123Lisa Hibner SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 53%1,219
1124Davida H. Isaacs LEXINGTON, KY 53%3,671
1125Alice Jordan GREENVILLE, SC 53%2,749
1126William E. Kenworthy PITTSBURGH, PA 53%933
1127Peter Kimball MINNEAPOLIS, MN 53%4,195
1128Ilene B. Kramer SAN ANTONIO, TX 53%3,600
1129Michelle K. Lindsay ALBUQUERQUE, NM 53%3,132
1130Ann F. MacMurray COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 53%678
1131Susan Maley WASHINGTON, DC 53%1,011
1132Alan J. Markiewicz ORANGE, CA 53%3,258
1133Denise M. Martin NHC CHICAGO, IL 53%2,792
1134Christopher J. Mattia LIVONIA MI, MI 53%3,447
1135John L. McFadyen KINGSPORT, TN 53%864
1136Gerald Meyr ST LOUIS, MO 53%3,013
1137Danette Mincey CHARLESTON SC, SC 53%805
1138Mary P. Parnow SAN FRANCISCO, CA 53%3,677
1139John J. Rabaut DETROIT, MI 53%584
1140John P. Ramos SYRACUSE, NY 53%3,381
1141Mary E. Richardson KNOXVILLE, TN 53%2,281
1142Raymond Rodgers FORT MYERS FL, FL 53%5,051
1143Jeffrey J. Schueler ROANOKE, VA 53%2,323
1144Nicholas J. Schwalbach MILWAUKEE, WI 53%1,464
1145Robert H. Schwartz PEORIA, IL 53%4,292
1146Anne Shaughnessy CINCINNATI, OH 53%3,463
1147Reuben Sheperd AKRON OH, OH 53%3,062
1148Mark Siegel KNOXVILLE, TN 53%1,289
1149Marc Silverman ELKINS PARK, PA 53%2,798
1150Sharda Singh BRONX, NY 53%3,527
1151Andrew G. Sloss FLINT, MI 53%3,939
1152Jennifer Smiley NHC CHICAGO, IL 53%2,565
1153Jonathan Stanley LEXINGTON, KY 53%4,496
1154Flor M. Suarez NEW YORK, NY 53%1,573
1155Therese Tobin DETROIT, MI 53%3,838
1156Laura Valente SEATTLE, WA 53%2,898
1157Christopher Van Dyck FORT WORTH, TX 53%3,411
1158Robert Waller MOBILE, AL 53%2,686
1159Roger E. Winkelman SANTA BARBARA, CA 53%2,487
1160John W. Wojciechowski PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 53%1,616
1161Dean Yanohira NORWALK, CA 53%122
1162Daniel Benjamin SAN BERNARDINO, CA 52%1,694
1163Joseph Bestul COVINGTON GA, GA 52%3,252
1164Louis Bonsangue HARTFORD, CT 52%4,001
1165Joseph Booth GREENSBORO, NC 52%348
1166Belinda J. Brown INDIANAPOLIS, IN 52%2,057
1167Stephen C. Calvarese JACKSONVILLE, FL 52%2,584
1168Sharlee Cendrosky AKRON OH, OH 52%995
1169James Cumbie GREENVILLE, SC 52%2,686
1170Dan Dane FORT WORTH, TX 52%184
1171Melinda L. Dula ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 52%3,394
1172Ann Farris ALBUQUERQUE, NM 52%1,561
1173Monica L. Flynn NORFOLK, VA 52%1,992
1174Colin Fritz GREENVILLE, SC 52%2,824
1175Paul Georger BUFFALO, NY 52%3,129
1176Stewart Goldstein NORFOLK, VA 52%1,115
1177Paula J. Goodrich AKRON OH, OH 52%2,708
1178Paul Goodson CHARLOTTE, NC 52%3,117
1179John H. Goree LITTLE ROCK, AR 52%4,414
1180Benjamin Green BRONX, NY 52%133
1181Marie Greener SYRACUSE, NY 52%487
1182Darren Hamner FORT WORTH, TX 52%4,622
1183Steve Hanekamp ST LOUIS, MO 52%290
1184Joseph L. Heimann ST LOUIS, MO 52%1,488
1185David L. Horton BIRMINGHAM, AL 52%1,130
1186Deirdre R. Horton NEW HAVEN, CT 52%2,876
1187Lana Johnson EVANSTON, IL 52%4,103
1188Lyle A. Jones MEMPHIS, TN 52%2,221
1189Peter Jung KANSAS CITY, MO 52%3,316
1190Ryan Kirzner TAMPA OHO, FL 52%3,254
1191Guy Koster JACKSONVILLE, FL 52%2,483
1192Emilie Kraft BIRMINGHAM, AL 52%3,937
1193David LaBarre OAKLAND, CA 52%3,002
1194Brian Lucas NHC CHICAGO, IL 52%3,265
1195Juan E. Milanes MORGANTOWN, WV 52%3,067
1196R. N. Owen CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 52%306
1197Henry Perez Jr. LIVONIA MI, MI 52%498
1198Lisa Raleigh TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FL 52%3,103
1199William P. Reeves EUGENE, OR 52%1,277
1200Karen Robinson CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 52%600

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).