All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 15 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1401–1500 of 2044 judges
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,387
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,174
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
4,417
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,806
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
4,173
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
4,071
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,551
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,088
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,307
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,025
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,318
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
852
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
4,051
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,145
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
230
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,932
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
987
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,698
1419 B. Hannan
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,650
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,580
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,010
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,653
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,529
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
903
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,130
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
4,301
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
4,252
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
159
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,679
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,314
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,646
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,107
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,482
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,666
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
821
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,695
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
134
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,096
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,455
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,477
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,843
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,514
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,371
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
559
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,648
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
908
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
260
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,202
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,749
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,472
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,261
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
4,028
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,176
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,341
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
4,446
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,667
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,744
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,242
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
1,237
Office
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
2,300
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,105
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
1,859
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,787
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
417
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
4,481
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,736
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
344
Office
MCALESTER
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
1,125
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
895
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,030
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,840
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,973
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,846
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,559
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,184
Office
WHITE PLAINS
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
1,314
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
1,977
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
1,959
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
680
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,249
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,825
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
1,561
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
1,010
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
492
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,370
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,736
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
376
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,404
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,747
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,554
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,929
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
628
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
4,139
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
4,747
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
574
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,538
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
332
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
1,453
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
3,653
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,847
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1401Frederick Andreas CLEVELAND, OH 48%3,387
1402James Andres FT LAUDERDALE, FL 48%2,174
1403John Antonowicz LONG ISLAND, NY 48%4,417
1404Paul D. Barker Jr. NHC BALTIMORE, MD 48%1,806
1405Frank Barletta WILKES BARRE, PA 48%4,173
1406Brent C. Bedwell MILWAUKEE, WI 48%4,071
1407David F. Brash PITTSBURGH, PA 48%1,551
1408Earl C. Cates Jr. PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 48%1,088
1409Donald P. Cole SAN DIEGO, CA 48%1,307
1410Steven A. De Monbreum EUGENE, OR 48%2,025
1411Allison Dietz LIVONIA MI, MI 48%3,318
1412Donald B. Fishman SAVANNAH, GA 48%852
1413Eric S. Fulcher MACON, GA 48%4,051
1414George M. Gaffaney EVANSTON, IL 48%3,145
1415Robert E. Gale SYRACUSE, NY 48%230
1416Paul W. Goodale PROVIDENCE, RI 48%3,932
1417Tamia N. Gordon NEW ORLEANS, LA 48%987
1418William H. Greer JACKSONVILLE, FL 48%3,698
1419B. Hannan NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 48%2,650
1420Ryan Hoback ELKINS PARK, PA 48%1,580
1421Mark Hockensmith DAYTON, OH 48%2,010
1422Lori Imsland ST LOUIS, MO 48%3,653
1423Barry H. Jenkins LAS VEGAS, NV 48%2,529
1424Melissa L. Jones BUFFALO, NY 48%903
1425Wylly Jordan III COVINGTON GA, GA 48%2,130
1426Gregory G. Kenyon DAYTON, OH 48%4,301
1427Carrie Kerber DAYTON, OH 48%4,252
1428Robert P. Kingsley TACOMA WA, WA 48%159
1429Russell W. Lewis MACON, GA 48%1,679
1430Pamela E. Loesel CLEVELAND, OH 48%2,314
1431Perry Martin BIRMINGHAM, AL 48%2,646
1432Peter J. Martinelli SPRINGFIELD MA, MA 48%1,107
1433Sheila E. McDonald BIRMINGHAM, AL 48%3,482
1434Corinne T. McLaughlin OAKLAND, CA 48%2,666
1435Aaron M. Morgan NEW YORK VARICK, NY 48%821
1436Scott T. Morris JACKSONVILLE, FL 48%2,695
1437Thomas G. Norman HOUSTON-BISSONNET, TX 48%134
1438Maria Nunez RICHMOND, VA 48%1,096
1439Mike Oleyar WILKES BARRE, PA 48%2,455
1440Marie Palachuk SPOKANE, WA 48%3,477
1441Anne H. Pate DALLAS NORTH, TX 48%1,843
1442David Peeples PADUCAH, KY 48%2,514
1443Kathryn Preston ST LOUIS, MO 48%2,371
1444Curtis Renoe SACRAMENTO, CA 48%559
1445Arman Rouf MILWAUKEE, WI 48%3,648
1446Bettye L. Rutledge PHILADELPHIA EAST, PA 48%908
1447Renee B. Satisfield BIRMINGHAM, AL 48%260
1448Anne Sharrard BOSTON, MA 48%3,202
1449Clifford Shilling FORT SMITH, AR 48%1,749
1450Edward M. Starr FORT SMITH, AR 48%3,472
1451Timothy G. Stewart METAIRIE, LA 48%1,261
1452Larry J. Stroud JACKSON MS OHO, MS 48%4,028
1453Cheryl Tompkin OAKLAND, CA 48%1,176
1454William T. Vest Jr. NORFOLK, VA 48%1,341
1455Thomas J. Wheeler DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 48%4,446
1456Gladys Whitfield INDIANAPOLIS, IN 48%3,667
1457James E. Williams RALEIGH, NC 48%3,744
1458Kimberly O. Wyatt RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX, TX 48%3,242
1459Christa Zamora PHOENIX, AZ 48%1,237
1460Susan F. Zapf PEORIA, IL 48%2,300
1461Monica J. Anderson NEW ORLEANS, LA 47%3,105
1462Thomas Auble NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 47%1,859
1463Mark Baker RICHMOND, VA 47%2,787
1464Jeannie S. Bartlett CHATTANOOGA, TN 47%417
1465David Benedict METAIRIE, LA 47%4,481
1466Norman L. Bennett LAS VEGAS, NV 47%2,736
1467James L. Bentley TULSA OHO, OK 47%344
1468James Bentley MCALESTER 47%1,125
1469Lisa A. Bentley ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 47%895
1470Kathryn Bridges CHICAGO, IL 47%3,030
1471Benjamin Burton KINGSPORT, TN 47%2,840
1472Patricia Carey TOLEDO OH, OH 47%3,973
1473Eliaser Chaparro LITTLE ROCK, AR 47%3,846
1474Stephen Cordovani BUFFALO, NY 47%3,559
1475Henry DeWoskin ST LOUIS, MO 47%3,184
1476Katherine Edgell WHITE PLAINS 47%1,314
1477Stephen C. Fulton BOSTON, MA 47%1,977
1478Cole Gerstner ALBUQUERQUE, NM 47%1,959
1479Carmen Graves MEMPHIS, TN 47%680
1480James K. Grimes FLORENCE, AL 47%3,249
1481Carol Guyton DETROIT, MI 47%2,825
1482Gregory M. Hamel NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 47%1,561
1483Bonnie Hannan WASHINGTON, DC 47%1,010
1484Patricia E. Hartman DENVER, CO 47%492
1485Henry J. Hogan BOSTON, MA 47%2,370
1486Richard Hopkins ST LOUIS, MO 47%2,736
1487William R. Ingram MEMPHIS, TN 47%376
1488Matthew Kuperstein NEW HAVEN, CT 47%2,404
1489Bill Laskaris CHICAGO, IL 47%3,747
1490David S. Lewandowski MIDDLESBORO, KY 47%2,554
1491Robert Martin NASHVILLE, TN 47%3,929
1492Teresa J. McGarry JACKSONVILLE, FL 47%628
1493Bernard J. McKay SAN ANTONIO, TX 47%4,139
1494Gerald L. Meyer HOUSTON NORTH, TX 47%4,747
1495Stephanie Nagel CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 47%574
1496Barry O'Melinn ALBUQUERQUE, NM 47%3,538
1497Nadine Overton PHILADELPHIA, PA 47%332
1498Mary Jane Pelton SYRACUSE, NY 47%1,453
1499Micah Pharris MINNEAPOLIS, MN 47%3,653
1500David Romeo FORT SMITH, AR 47%2,847

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).