Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1401 | Shreese M. Wilson | PEORIA, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 49% | 2,711 | |
| 1402 | Stacy Zimmerman | ORANGE, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 49% | 3,097 | |
| 1403 | Genevieve Adamo | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 3,579 | |
| 1404 | Karl Alexander | MORGANTOWN, WVLast decision Sep 2018 | 48% | 549 | |
| 1405 | Gwen Anderson | NHC ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Oct 2017 | 48% | 453 | |
| 1406 | Frederick Andreas | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Sep 2025 | 48% | 3,387 | |
| 1407 | James Andres | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Sep 2022 | 48% | 2,174 | |
| 1408 | John Antonowicz | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 4,417 | |
| 1409 | Paul D. Barker Jr. | NHC BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Feb 2023 | 48% | 1,806 | |
| 1410 | Frank Barletta | WILKES BARRE, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 4,173 | |
| 1411 | Brent C. Bedwell | MILWAUKEE, WILast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 4,071 | |
| 1412 | David F. Brash | PITTSBURGH, PALast decision Sep 2021 | 48% | 1,551 | |
| 1413 | Earl C. Cates Jr. | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Sep 2020 | 48% | 1,088 | |
| 1414 | Donald P. Cole | SAN DIEGO, CALast decision Sep 2019 | 48% | 1,307 | |
| 1415 | Steven A. De Monbreum | EUGENE, ORLast decision Sep 2022 | 48% | 2,025 | |
| 1416 | Allison Dietz | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 3,318 | |
| 1417 | Donald B. Fishman | SAVANNAH, GALast decision Sep 2021 | 48% | 852 | |
| 1418 | Eric S. Fulcher | MACON, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 4,051 | |
| 1419 | George M. Gaffaney | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Sep 2024 | 48% | 3,145 | |
| 1420 | Robert E. Gale | SYRACUSE, NYLast decision Sep 2017 | 48% | 230 | |
| 1421 | Paul W. Goodale | PROVIDENCE, RILast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 3,932 | |
| 1422 | Tamia N. Gordon | NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Sep 2018 | 48% | 987 | |
| 1423 | William H. Greer | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 3,698 | |
| 1424 | B. Hannan | NHC FALLS CHURCH, DCLast decision Sep 2025 | 48% | 2,650 | |
| 1425 | Ryan Hoback | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Sep 2022 | 48% | 1,580 | |
| 1426 | Mark Hockensmith | DAYTON, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 2,010 | |
| 1427 | Lori Imsland | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 3,653 | |
| 1428 | Barry H. Jenkins | LAS VEGAS, NVLast decision Sep 2022 | 48% | 2,529 | |
| 1429 | Melissa L. Jones | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2020 | 48% | 903 | |
| 1430 | Wylly Jordan III | COVINGTON GA, GALast decision Sep 2025 | 48% | 2,130 | |
| 1431 | Gregory G. Kenyon | DAYTON, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 4,301 | |
| 1432 | Carrie Kerber | DAYTON, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 4,252 | |
| 1433 | Robert P. Kingsley | TACOMA WA, WALast decision Sep 2016 | 48% | 159 | |
| 1434 | Russell W. Lewis | MACON, GALast decision Sep 2020 | 48% | 1,679 | |
| 1435 | Pamela E. Loesel | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Sep 2023 | 48% | 2,314 | |
| 1436 | Perry Martin | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2021 | 48% | 2,646 | |
| 1437 | Peter J. Martinelli | SPRINGFIELD MA, MALast decision Sep 2021 | 48% | 1,107 | |
| 1438 | Sheila E. McDonald | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2025 | 48% | 3,482 | |
| 1439 | Corinne T. McLaughlin | OAKLAND, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 2,666 | |
| 1440 | Aaron M. Morgan | NEW YORK VARICK, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 821 | |
| 1441 | Scott T. Morris | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 2,695 | |
| 1442 | Thomas G. Norman | HOUSTON-BISSONNET, TXLast decision Sep 2016 | 48% | 134 | |
| 1443 | Maria Nunez | RICHMOND, VALast decision Sep 2024 | 48% | 1,096 | |
| 1444 | Mike Oleyar | WILKES BARRE, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 2,455 | |
| 1445 | Marie Palachuk | SPOKANE, WALast decision Sep 2025 | 48% | 3,477 | |
| 1446 | Anne H. Pate | DALLAS NORTH, TXLast decision Sep 2019 | 48% | 1,843 | |
| 1447 | David Peeples | PADUCAH, KYLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 2,514 | |
| 1448 | Curtis Renoe | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 48% | 559 | |
| 1449 | Arman Rouf | MILWAUKEE, WILast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 3,648 | |
| 1450 | Bettye L. Rutledge | PHILADELPHIA EAST, PALast decision Sep 2021 | 48% | 908 | |
| 1451 | Renee B. Satisfield | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2025 | 48% | 260 | |
| 1452 | Anne Sharrard | BOSTON, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 3,202 | |
| 1453 | Clifford Shilling | FORT SMITH, ARLast decision Sep 2022 | 48% | 1,749 | |
| 1454 | Edward M. Starr | FORT SMITH, ARLast decision Sep 2024 | 48% | 3,472 | |
| 1455 | Timothy G. Stewart | METAIRIE, LALast decision Sep 2019 | 48% | 1,261 | |
| 1456 | Larry J. Stroud | JACKSON MS OHO, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 4,028 | |
| 1457 | Cheryl Tompkin | OAKLAND, CALast decision Sep 2021 | 48% | 1,176 | |
| 1458 | William T. Vest Jr. | NORFOLK, VALast decision Sep 2019 | 48% | 1,341 | |
| 1459 | Thomas J. Wheeler | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 4,446 | |
| 1460 | Gladys Whitfield | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 3,667 | |
| 1461 | James E. Williams | RALEIGH, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 3,744 | |
| 1462 | Kimberly O. Wyatt | RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 48% | 3,242 | |
| 1463 | Christa Zamora | PHOENIX, AZLast decision Sep 2019 | 48% | 1,237 | |
| 1464 | Susan F. Zapf | PEORIA, ILLast decision Sep 2021 | 48% | 2,300 | |
| 1465 | Monica J. Anderson | NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 3,105 | |
| 1466 | Thomas Auble | NHC FALLS CHURCH, DCLast decision Sep 2023 | 47% | 1,859 | |
| 1467 | Mark Baker | RICHMOND, VALast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 2,787 | |
| 1468 | Jeannie S. Bartlett | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Sep 2016 | 47% | 417 | |
| 1469 | David Benedict | METAIRIE, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 4,481 | |
| 1470 | Norman L. Bennett | LAS VEGAS, NVLast decision Sep 2022 | 47% | 2,736 | |
| 1471 | James L. Bentley | TULSA OHO, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 344 | |
| 1472 | James Bentley | MCALESTERLast decision Mar 2018 | 47% | 1,125 | |
| 1473 | Lisa A. Bentley | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 895 | |
| 1474 | Kathryn Bridges | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 3,030 | |
| 1475 | Benjamin Burton | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 2,840 | |
| 1476 | Patricia Carey | TOLEDO OH, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 3,973 | |
| 1477 | Eliaser Chaparro | LITTLE ROCK, ARLast decision Sep 2025 | 47% | 3,846 | |
| 1478 | Stephen Cordovani | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 3,559 | |
| 1479 | Henry DeWoskin | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 3,184 | |
| 1480 | Katherine Edgell | WHITE PLAINSLast decision Sep 2019 | 47% | 1,314 | |
| 1481 | Stephen C. Fulton | BOSTON, MALast decision Sep 2022 | 47% | 1,977 | |
| 1482 | Cole Gerstner | ALBUQUERQUE, NMLast decision Sep 2021 | 47% | 1,959 | |
| 1483 | Carmen Graves | MEMPHIS, TNLast decision Sep 2018 | 47% | 680 | |
| 1484 | James K. Grimes | FLORENCE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 3,249 | |
| 1485 | Carol Guyton | DETROIT, MILast decision Sep 2025 | 47% | 2,825 | |
| 1486 | Gregory M. Hamel | NHC FALLS CHURCH, DCLast decision Sep 2021 | 47% | 1,561 | |
| 1487 | Bonnie Hannan | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 1,011 | |
| 1488 | Patricia E. Hartman | DENVER, COLast decision Sep 2017 | 47% | 492 | |
| 1489 | Henry J. Hogan | BOSTON, MALast decision Sep 2023 | 47% | 2,370 | |
| 1490 | Richard Hopkins | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Sep 2025 | 47% | 2,736 | |
| 1491 | William R. Ingram | MEMPHIS, TNLast decision Sep 2016 | 47% | 376 | |
| 1492 | Matthew Kuperstein | NEW HAVEN, CTLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 2,404 | |
| 1493 | Bill Laskaris | CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 3,747 | |
| 1494 | David S. Lewandowski | MIDDLESBORO, KYLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 2,554 | |
| 1495 | Robert Martin | NASHVILLE, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 3,929 | |
| 1496 | Teresa J. McGarry | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Sep 2017 | 47% | 628 | |
| 1497 | Bernard J. McKay | SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 4,139 | |
| 1498 | Gerald L. Meyer | HOUSTON NORTH, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 4,747 | |
| 1499 | Stephanie Nagel | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Sep 2018 | 47% | 574 | |
| 1500 | Barry O'Melinn | NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NMLast decision Jul 2026 | 47% | 3,538 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.