Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 501 | Jeanne M. VanderHeide | RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 3,370 | |
| 502 | Richard West | NEWARK, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 3,557 | |
| 503 | George M. Akins | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 622 | |
| 504 | James P. Alderisio | ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 4,467 | |
| 505 | Thurman Anderson | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Sep 2022 | 64% | 2,189 | |
| 506 | John C. Arkoosh | BILLINGS, MTLast decision Sep 2019 | 64% | 634 | |
| 507 | Edward T. Bauer | SPRINGFIELD MA, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 3,136 | |
| 508 | Dale Black-Pennington | ALBANY, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 3,628 | |
| 509 | J. William Callahan | OAK PARK, MILast decision Sep 2018 | 64% | 1,022 | |
| 510 | Noran J. Camp | BOSTON, MALast decision Sep 2019 | 64% | 446 | |
| 511 | David Cornelius | MACON, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 3,817 | |
| 512 | Michelle Crawford | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2020 | 64% | 856 | |
| 513 | Kimberly S. Cromer | COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 4,369 | |
| 514 | Don Curdie | LITTLE ROCK, ARLast decision Sep 2020 | 64% | 1,787 | |
| 515 | Patrick S. Cutter | HARRISBURG, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 3,607 | |
| 516 | Donald G. D'Amato | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 4,513 | |
| 517 | Ucheakpunwa Egemonye | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 931 | |
| 518 | Vickie Evans | SAVANNAH, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 3,546 | |
| 519 | John P. Giannikas | LOS ANGELES WEST, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 64% | 583 | |
| 520 | Douglas Gilmer | HATTIESBURG, MSLast decision Sep 2025 | 64% | 3,203 | |
| 521 | Harold Glanville | PONCELast decision Sep 2019 | 64% | 1,421 | |
| 522 | David R. Gutierrez | HOUSTON NORTH, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 5,319 | |
| 523 | Jacqueline Haber Lamkay | QUEENS, NYLast decision Sep 2017 | 64% | 447 | |
| 524 | Traci M. Hixson | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 4,173 | |
| 525 | Terrence Hugar | DENVER, COLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 3,671 | |
| 526 | Douglas W. Johnson | GRAND RAPIDS, MILast decision Sep 2018 | 64% | 330 | |
| 527 | Mary E. Johnson | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Sep 2022 | 64% | 1,472 | |
| 528 | Brian G. Kanner | BRONX, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 64% | 2,435 | |
| 529 | James Kearns | NEW YORK VARICK, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 1,581 | |
| 530 | Richard A. Kelly | PHILADELPHIA, PALast decision Sep 2017 | 64% | 323 | |
| 531 | Kristen King | CINCINNATI, OHLast decision Sep 2023 | 64% | 1,760 | |
| 532 | Sherianne Laba | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Sep 2020 | 64% | 114 | |
| 533 | Janet McEneaney | NEW YORK VARICK, NYLast decision Sep 2023 | 64% | 1,480 | |
| 534 | Cristen Meadows | CINCINNATI, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 3,153 | |
| 535 | Kathleen S. Molinar | ALEXANDRIA, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 4,140 | |
| 536 | Evan Nordby | WICHITA, KSLast decision Sep 2018 | 64% | 146 | |
| 537 | Jody H. Odell | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 4,401 | |
| 538 | Jesus Ortis | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2025 | 64% | 526 | |
| 539 | Hiral D. Patel | RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 1,482 | |
| 540 | Anthony Reeves | DOVER, DELast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 2,686 | |
| 541 | Cheryl M. Rini | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Sep 2017 | 64% | 159 | |
| 542 | Linda Gail Roberts | FRANKLIN TN, TNLast decision Feb 2018 | 64% | 952 | |
| 543 | Brenda Rosten | FARGO, NDLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 4,582 | |
| 544 | Troy Silva | SAN BERNARDINO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 3,093 | |
| 545 | Elizabeth Stevens Bentley | SAN BERNARDINO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 3,859 | |
| 546 | Paul M. Stimson | MEMPHIS, TNLast decision Sep 2023 | 64% | 2,979 | |
| 547 | Timothy Suing | HOUSTON WEST, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 2,097 | |
| 548 | Samuel Thomason | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 1,289 | |
| 549 | Sabrina M. Tilley | CHARLESTON WV, WVLast decision Sep 2023 | 64% | 2,299 | |
| 550 | Frederick Upshall Jr. | ALBUQUERQUE, NMLast decision Sep 2019 | 64% | 1,577 | |
| 551 | Tova Wolking | SAN JOSE, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 679 | |
| 552 | Brian W. Wood | SEVEN FIELDS, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 64% | 3,782 | |
| 553 | Peter J. Baum | RENO, NVLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 4,150 | |
| 554 | Alice F. Blackmore | OAK PARK, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 945 | |
| 555 | Shiva Bozarth | FRESNO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 2,995 | |
| 556 | Nancy L. Brock | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Sep 2022 | 63% | 2,308 | |
| 557 | Daniel S. Campbell | MOBILE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 2,901 | |
| 558 | John Campbell | NEWARK, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 2,533 | |
| 559 | Yasmin Elias | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 2,463 | |
| 560 | Diana Erickson | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,592 | |
| 561 | Guy E. Fletcher | PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,765 | |
| 562 | Kevin F. Foley | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Sep 2018 | 63% | 806 | |
| 563 | Joel F. Gardiner | BOSTON, MALast decision Sep 2016 | 63% | 103 | |
| 564 | Thomas J. Gaye | SAN JOSE, CALast decision Sep 2019 | 63% | 1,091 | |
| 565 | Kevin Gill | OAKLAND, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,017 | |
| 566 | Matthew J. Gordon | DES MOINES, IALast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,674 | |
| 567 | Mark B. Greenberg | SAN DIEGO, CALast decision Sep 2019 | 63% | 1,590 | |
| 568 | Lisa Groeneveld-Meijer | MANCHESTER, NHLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,608 | |
| 569 | Patrick M. Horan | OAK PARK, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 918 | |
| 570 | Charles R. Howard | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 5,161 | |
| 571 | Mary Pamela Hubert | PORTLAND ME, MELast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 1,183 | |
| 572 | Paul W. Johnson | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Sep 2022 | 63% | 2,334 | |
| 573 | John Kays | BILLINGS, MTLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 4,170 | |
| 574 | Tracy LaChance | MANCHESTER, NHLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,021 | |
| 575 | Mary S. Lassy | PADUCAH, KYLast decision Sep 2016 | 63% | 275 | |
| 576 | Sue Leise | SEATTLE, WALast decision Sep 2025 | 63% | 2,885 | |
| 577 | Jennifer M. Long | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Sep 2016 | 63% | 353 | |
| 578 | Larry C. Marcy | FORT WORTH, TXLast decision Sep 2021 | 63% | 2,549 | |
| 579 | John Martin | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,717 | |
| 580 | David A. Mason | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 198 | |
| 581 | Marni R. McCaghren | MOBILE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,297 | |
| 582 | JoErin O'Leary | MT PLEASANT MI, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 4,020 | |
| 583 | Gina A. Pantuso | JERSEY CITY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 799 | |
| 584 | Kim D. Parrish | OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 4,749 | |
| 585 | Jesse J. Pease | RENO, NVLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 2,827 | |
| 586 | Sommattie Ramrup | NEW YORK VARICK, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 63% | 1,364 | |
| 587 | J. Dennis Reap | FRANKLIN TN, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,935 | |
| 588 | Gail Reich | LOS ANGELES WEST, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,568 | |
| 589 | Brian Saame | CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 1,223 | |
| 590 | Mario G. Silva | FORT MYERS FL, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 2,697 | |
| 591 | Stewart Stallings | SPOKANE, WALast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,439 | |
| 592 | Judith M. Stolfo | SPRINGFIELD MA, MALast decision Sep 2018 | 63% | 925 | |
| 593 | Richard Thrasher | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 1,445 | |
| 594 | Barbara von Euler | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 2,813 | |
| 595 | Harry L. Williams | HOUSTON NORTH, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 219 | |
| 596 | Matthew Winfrey | COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 3,114 | |
| 597 | Davis Yee | SAN JOSE, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 63% | 732 | |
| 598 | Ted W. Armbruster | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 4,076 | |
| 599 | Eric V. Benham | SAN DIEGO, CALast decision Sep 2025 | 62% | 2,530 | |
| 600 | Steven L. Butler | DOVER, DELast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 3,384 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.