All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 6 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 501–600 of 2044 judges
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,557
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
622
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
4,467
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
2,189
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
634
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
3,136
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
3,628
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
1,022
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
446
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
3,817
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
856
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
4,369
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
1,787
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
3,607
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
4,513
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
931
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
3,546
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
583
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
3,203
Office
PONCE
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
1,421
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
5,319
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
4,173
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
3,671
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
330
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
1,472
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
2,435
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
1,581
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
323
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
1,760
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
114
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
1,480
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
3,153
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
4,140
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
146
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
4,401
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
526
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
1,482
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
2,686
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
159
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
952
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
4,582
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
3,093
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
2,979
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
2,094
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
1,289
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
2,299
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
1,577
Office
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
679
Approval Rate
64%
Decisions
3,782
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
4,150
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
945
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,995
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,308
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,901
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,533
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,463
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,592
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,765
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
806
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
103
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
1,091
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,017
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,674
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
1,590
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,608
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
918
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
5,161
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
1,183
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,334
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
4,170
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,021
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
275
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,885
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
353
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,549
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,717
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
198
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,297
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
4,020
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
799
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
4,749
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,827
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
1,364
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,935
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,568
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
1,223
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,697
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,439
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
925
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
1,445
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
2,813
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
219
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
3,114
Office
Approval Rate
63%
Decisions
732
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
4,076
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,530
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,384
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,428
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,164
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
4,531
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
501Richard West NEWARK, NJ 65%3,557
502George M. Akins MONTGOMERY, AL 64%622
503James P. Alderisio ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 64%4,467
504Thurman Anderson FT LAUDERDALE, FL 64%2,189
505John C. Arkoosh BILLINGS, MT 64%634
506Edward T. Bauer SPRINGFIELD MA, MA 64%3,136
507Dale Black-Pennington ALBANY, NY 64%3,628
508J. William Callahan OAK PARK, MI 64%1,022
509Noran J. Camp BOSTON, MA 64%446
510David Cornelius MACON, GA 64%3,817
511Michelle Crawford BALTIMORE, MD 64%856
512Kimberly S. Cromer COLUMBUS, OH 64%4,369
513Don Curdie LITTLE ROCK, AR 64%1,787
514Patrick S. Cutter HARRISBURG, PA 64%3,607
515Donald G. D'Amato LIVONIA MI, MI 64%4,513
516Ucheakpunwa Egemonye ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 64%931
517Vickie Evans SAVANNAH, GA 64%3,546
518John P. Giannikas LOS ANGELES WEST, CA 64%583
519Douglas Gilmer HATTIESBURG, MS 64%3,203
520Harold Glanville PONCE 64%1,421
521David R. Gutierrez HOUSTON NORTH, TX 64%5,319
522Traci M. Hixson CLEVELAND, OH 64%4,173
523Terrence Hugar DENVER, CO 64%3,671
524Douglas W. Johnson GRAND RAPIDS, MI 64%330
525Mary E. Johnson DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 64%1,472
526Brian G. Kanner BRONX, NY 64%2,435
527James Kearns NEW YORK VARICK, NY 64%1,581
528Richard A. Kelly PHILADELPHIA, PA 64%323
529Kristen King CINCINNATI, OH 64%1,760
530Sherianne Laba KANSAS CITY, MO 64%114
531Janet McEneaney NEW YORK VARICK, NY 64%1,480
532Cristen Meadows CINCINNATI, OH 64%3,153
533Kathleen S. Molinar ALEXANDRIA, LA 64%4,140
534Evan Nordby WICHITA, KS 64%146
535Jody H. Odell INDIANAPOLIS, IN 64%4,401
536Jesus Ortis BALTIMORE, MD 64%526
537Hiral D. Patel RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX, TX 64%1,482
538Anthony Reeves DOVER, DE 64%2,686
539Cheryl M. Rini CLEVELAND, OH 64%159
540Linda Gail Roberts FRANKLIN TN, TN 64%952
541Brenda Rosten FARGO, ND 64%4,582
542Troy Silva SAN BERNARDINO, CA 64%3,093
543Paul M. Stimson MEMPHIS, TN 64%2,979
544Timothy Suing HOUSTON WEST, TX 64%2,094
545Samuel Thomason DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 64%1,289
546Sabrina M. Tilley CHARLESTON WV, WV 64%2,299
547Frederick Upshall Jr. ALBUQUERQUE, NM 64%1,577
548Tova Wolking SAN JOSE, CA 64%679
549Brian W. Wood SEVEN FIELDS, PA 64%3,782
550Peter J. Baum RENO, NV 63%4,150
551Alice F. Blackmore OAK PARK, MI 63%945
552Shiva Bozarth FRESNO, CA 63%2,995
553Nancy L. Brock GREENSBORO, NC 63%2,308
554Daniel S. Campbell MOBILE, AL 63%2,901
555John Campbell NEWARK, NJ 63%2,533
556Yasmin Elias PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 63%2,463
557Diana Erickson KANSAS CITY, MO 63%3,592
558Guy E. Fletcher PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZ 63%3,765
559Kevin F. Foley CHARLOTTE, NC 63%806
560Joel F. Gardiner BOSTON, MA 63%103
561Thomas J. Gaye SAN JOSE, CA 63%1,091
562Kevin Gill OAKLAND, CA 63%3,017
563Matthew J. Gordon DES MOINES, IA 63%3,674
564Mark B. Greenberg SAN DIEGO, CA 63%1,590
565Lisa Groeneveld-Meijer MANCHESTER, NH 63%3,608
566Patrick M. Horan OAK PARK, MI 63%918
567Charles R. Howard KINGSPORT, TN 63%5,161
568Mary Pamela Hubert PORTLAND ME, ME 63%1,183
569Paul W. Johnson MONTGOMERY, AL 63%2,334
570John Kays BILLINGS, MT 63%4,170
571Tracy LaChance MANCHESTER, NH 63%3,021
572Mary S. Lassy PADUCAH, KY 63%275
573Sue Leise SEATTLE, WA 63%2,885
574Jennifer M. Long WASHINGTON, DC 63%353
575Larry C. Marcy FORT WORTH, TX 63%2,549
576John Martin EVANSTON, IL 63%3,717
577David A. Mason LIVONIA MI, MI 63%198
578Marni R. McCaghren MOBILE, AL 63%3,297
579JoErin O'Leary MT PLEASANT MI, MI 63%4,020
580Gina A. Pantuso JERSEY CITY, NJ 63%799
581Kim D. Parrish OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 63%4,749
582Jesse J. Pease RENO, NV 63%2,827
583Sommattie Ramrup NEW YORK VARICK, NY 63%1,364
584J. Dennis Reap FRANKLIN TN, TN 63%3,935
585Gail Reich LOS ANGELES WEST, CA 63%3,568
586Brian Saame CHICAGO, IL 63%1,223
587Mario G. Silva FORT MYERS FL, FL 63%2,697
588Stewart Stallings SPOKANE, WA 63%3,439
589Judith M. Stolfo SPRINGFIELD MA, MA 63%925
590Richard Thrasher MINNEAPOLIS, MN 63%1,445
591Barbara von Euler GREENSBORO, NC 63%2,813
592Harry L. Williams HOUSTON NORTH, TX 63%219
593Matthew Winfrey COLUMBUS, OH 63%3,114
594Davis Yee SAN JOSE, CA 63%732
595Ted W. Armbruster PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 62%4,076
596Eric V. Benham SAN DIEGO, CA 62%2,530
597Steven L. Butler DOVER, DE 62%3,384
598Michael A. Cabotaje SAN RAFAEL, CA 62%2,428
599Michael Calabro ORLANDO, FL 62%1,164
600Laura Chess MT PLEASANT MI, MI 62%4,531

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).