All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 16 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1501–1600 of 2044 judges
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,786
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,190
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,161
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
4,311
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
2,203
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
895
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
4,537
Office
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
481
Approval Rate
47%
Decisions
1,732
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,242
1511 A. Benton
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,672
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,047
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,005
Office
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,678
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
4,131
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
1,083
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,342
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,367
Office
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
472
Office
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,939
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
1,188
Office
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,263
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,675
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
5,883
1525 M. Hart
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,098
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
679
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
705
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
4,478
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
1,076
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
1,087
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
1,918
Office
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,095
Office
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
1,912
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
4,465
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,269
Office
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
905
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
1,519
Office
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,630
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,301
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,167
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,103
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,426
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,226
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,318
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
4,057
Office
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
441
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
1,136
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
3,387
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
1,531
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
2,899
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
116
Office
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
1,051
Approval Rate
46%
Decisions
414
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
2,087
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,465
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,882
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
4,172
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,940
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
4,520
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
1,241
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,180
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
720
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
221
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
764
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,049
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
5,329
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,295
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,738
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
4,178
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,202
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,033
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,925
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
4,100
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,733
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,149
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
4,006
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
2,876
1578 Jay Marku
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
1,757
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,722
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
2,371
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,789
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
1,134
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
1,679
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,011
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
4,566
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
635
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,563
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
713
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,964
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
1,677
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
2,305
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
2,956
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,222
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
2,574
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,987
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,436
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,229
Office
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
3,603
Approval Rate
45%
Decisions
2,893
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
1,347
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1501Malcolm Ross SEATTLE, WA 47%2,786
1502Romona Scales VALPARAISO IN, IN 47%2,190
1503Toni Shropshire LITTLE ROCK, AR 47%2,161
1504Scott M. Staller HARRISBURG, PA 47%4,311
1505William R. Stanley MORGANTOWN, WV 47%2,203
1506Talia Timmins ALBUQUERQUE, NM 47%895
1507Christopher Willis FAYETTEVILLE NC, NC 47%4,537
1508Kelly Wilson TACOMA, WA 47%481
1509Sharon Zanotto HARRISBURG, PA 47%1,732
1510Devona F. Able ALEXANDRIA, LA 46%3,242
1511A. Benton NHC ST LOUIS, MO 46%3,672
1512Kathryn D. Burgchardt COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 46%3,047
1513Ellen P. Bush LAWRENCE MA, MA 46%3,005
1514Jason W. Crowell EUGENE, OR 46%3,678
1515Kimani R. Eason HOUSTON WEST, TX 46%4,131
1516Steven J. Ehlenbeck ATLANTA NORTH, GA 46%1,083
1517Myriam C. Fernandez Rice NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NM 46%2,342
1518Kelley Fitzgerald JACKSONVILLE, FL 46%3,367
1519Lowell Fortune DENVER, CO 46%472
1520Jordan Garelick CHICAGO, IL 46%2,939
1521Paul Greenberg NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 46%1,188
1522Gretchen M. Greisler ALBANY, NY 46%3,263
1523Nicholas Grey MINNEAPOLIS, MN 46%2,675
1524Dennis Hansen LITTLE ROCK, AR 46%5,883
1525M. Hart JACKSONVILLE, FL 46%2,098
1526John A. Henderson DALLAS NORTH, TX 46%679
1527Robin L. Henrie SAN DIEGO, CA 46%705
1528Karen R. Jackson LEXINGTON, KY 46%4,478
1529Joshua Klasic MINNEAPOLIS, MN 46%1,076
1530Peter N. Koclanes CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 46%1,087
1531Virginia Kuhn MINNEAPOLIS, MN 46%1,918
1532Hallie E. Larsen FARGO, ND 46%3,095
1533Lawrence Lee TACOMA, WA 46%1,912
1534Tommye C. Mangus MIDDLESBORO, KY 46%4,465
1535Scott Massengill BALTIMORE, MD 46%2,269
1536Elizabeth A. Motta DAYTON, OH 46%905
1537Kim Soo Nagle DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 46%1,519
1538Kevin Plunkett OAKLAND, CA 46%2,630
1539Jennifer Pustizzi FT LAUDERDALE, FL 46%2,301
1540Lillian Richter ALBUQUERQUE, NM 46%2,167
1541Robert J. Ryan PHILADELPHIA, PA 46%3,103
1542William E. Sampson FORT WORTH, TX 46%2,426
1543Kurt D. Schuman COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 46%2,226
1544Francine A. Serafin CHARLESTON WV, WV 46%3,318
1545Larry D. Shepherd OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 46%4,057
1546Randall C. Stout FLORENCE, AL 46%441
1547Clarence D. Stripling LITTLE ROCK, AR 46%1,136
1548Carl Bennett Watson CHARLESTON SC, SC 46%3,387
1549Ena Weathers LOS ANGELES WEST, CA 46%1,531
1550Melinda Wells HUNTINGTON WV, WV 46%2,899
1551Leslie Weyn BALTIMORE, MD 46%116
1552Paul E. Yerian COLUMBUS, OH 46%1,051
1553Robert W. Young BALTIMORE, MD 46%414
1554Nelisbeth Ball BALTIMORE, MD 45%2,087
1555Christian Bareford PITTSBURGH, PA 45%3,465
1556Alexander P. Borre HARTFORD, CT 45%3,882
1557Brock Cima FORT WORTH, TX 45%4,172
1558Steven Collins LOUISVILLE, KY 45%3,940
1559Jan E. Dutton OMAHA, NE 45%4,520
1560Jason C. Earnhart COLUMBUS, OH 45%1,241
1561Rosalind Eddins-Hill MEMPHIS, TN 45%3,180
1562L. Kalei Fong SACRAMENTO, CA 45%720
1563Jeffrey Gardner BRONX, NY 45%221
1564Hope G. Grunberg PHILADELPHIA EAST, PA 45%764
1565Melissa Hammock BALTIMORE, MD 45%3,049
1566Thomas J. Helget HOUSTON NORTH, TX 45%5,329
1567Michael Hellman SPRINGFIELD MA, MA 45%3,295
1568Mary E. Helmer BIRMINGHAM, AL 45%3,738
1569Jessica Inouye EVANSTON, IL 45%4,178
1570Lisa M. Johnson BIRMINGHAM, AL 45%3,202
1571Stephanie Katich FORT WAYNE, IN 45%3,033
1572Rebecca LaRiccia DENVER, CO 45%3,925
1573William Leland CLEVELAND, OH 45%4,100
1574Michael Leppala ALBUQUERQUE, NM 45%3,733
1575Jerry Lovitt LEXINGTON, KY 45%3,149
1576Dianne S. Mantel TOLEDO OH, OH 45%4,006
1577Stephen Marchioro BILLINGS, MT 45%2,876
1578Jay Marku ELKINS PARK, PA 45%1,757
1579Robert M. McPhail SAN ANTONIO, TX 45%3,722
1580Trina Mengesha-Brown OAK PARK, MI 45%2,371
1581Jeffrey C. Narvil JACKSON MS OHO, MS 45%3,789
1582Mary Beth O'Connor SAN RAFAEL, CA 45%1,134
1583Geraldine H. Page ROANOKE, VA 45%1,679
1584Laureen Penn NHC BALTIMORE, MD 45%3,011
1585William G. Reamon GRAND RAPIDS, MI 45%4,566
1586Bernadette Reiling DOVER, DE 45%635
1587Mallette Richey FLORENCE, AL 45%3,563
1588Paul G. Robeck PORTLAND OR, OR 45%713
1589Michael F. Schmitz AKRON OH, OH 45%3,964
1590Stanley M. Schwartz DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 45%1,677
1591Richard N. Staples KANSAS CITY, MO 45%2,305
1592Ken B. Terry JACKSONVILLE, FL 45%2,956
1593Edward L. Thompson OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 45%3,222
1594Gonzalo Vallecillo TAMPA OHO, FL 45%2,574
1595Carla L. Waters PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZ 45%3,987
1596Elizabeth Watson MORENO VALLEY, CA 45%3,436
1597William M. Weir BUFFALO, NY 45%3,229
1598Crystal L. White-Simmons DETROIT, MI 45%3,603
1599Arthur Zeidman LAS VEGAS, NV 45%2,893
1600Stacy Appleton MIDDLESBORO, KY 44%1,347

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).