All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 8 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 701–800 of 2044 judges
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
1,023
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,902
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,941
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,601
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,017
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
4,022
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,544
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,749
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,291
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,631
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,254
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
808
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
4,477
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,126
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,235
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,588
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,604
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,646
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,992
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,153
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,703
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,108
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,766
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,126
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,523
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,373
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,663
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,284
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,789
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,328
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,689
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,144
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,588
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,939
Office
WHITE PLAINS
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,103
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
634
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,151
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,409
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
301
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
267
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
320
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,805
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,981
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,955
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,837
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
4,000
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,001
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
654
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,897
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
655
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,532
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,549
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
2,665
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
835
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,874
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,596
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,215
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,297
Office
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,730
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
3,311
Approval Rate
60%
Decisions
1,989
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
661
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,616
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
1,855
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
3,902
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,281
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,839
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
1,427
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,041
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,741
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,795
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
4,082
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,082
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
102
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,431
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
4,355
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
1,277
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
3,563
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
3,404
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
1,647
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
276
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
3,959
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,494
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
411
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
4,063
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,173
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
1,558
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
699
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
983
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,929
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
3,730
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
908
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
1,149
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,966
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,036
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
3,507
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
1,052
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
4,083
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
3,862
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
2,733
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
701Melvin B. Werner WICHITA, KS 61%1,023
702Latanya White Richards NEW YORK VARICK, NY 61%2,902
703Rebecca Wolfe MIAMI OHO, FL 61%2,941
704Noell F. Allen INDIANAPOLIS, IN 60%2,601
705Wayne N. Araki SEATTLE, WA 60%1,017
706Corey Ayling MINNEAPOLIS, MN 60%4,022
707B. L. Blair LIVONIA MI, MI 60%1,544
708Amy Budney CLEVELAND, OH 60%3,749
709Brady Carter ELKINS PARK, PA 60%1,291
710Douglas Cohen SEVEN FIELDS, PA 60%3,631
711Kate Dana PROVIDENCE, RI 60%1,254
712Payam Danialzadeh SPRINGFIELD MA, MA 60%808
713Christopher R. Daniels COLUMBIA SC, SC 60%4,477
714Blanca B. de la Torre INDIANAPOLIS, IN 60%1,126
715Michael DePrimo TUPELO, MS 60%3,235
716Elizabeth Ebner NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 60%2,588
717David A. Ettinger NASHVILLE, TN 60%2,604
718Kathleen Fischer SAN BERNARDINO, CA 60%2,646
719Leeanne Foster VALPARAISO IN, IN 60%3,992
720Christopher Galloway NORFOLK, VA 60%1,153
721Tanya J. Garrian PROVIDENCE, RI 60%1,703
722Brian Garves COLUMBIA SC, SC 60%3,108
723Stuart Gauffreau ELKINS PARK, PA 60%3,766
724Edward C. Graham LONG BEACH, CA 60%2,126
725Sonya Grounds COVINGTON GA, GA 60%1,523
726Pearline Hardy TOPEKA KS, KS 60%2,373
727Catherine Harper RALEIGH, NC 60%3,663
728LaRonna Harris GREENSBORO, NC 60%2,284
729Jeffrey W. Hart MINNEAPOLIS, MN 60%3,789
730Joshua R. Heller TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FL 60%3,328
731Norman Hemming MIAMI OHO, FL 60%2,689
732Vincent Hill MACON, GA 60%3,144
733Kevin R. Himebaugh GRAND RAPIDS, MI 60%3,588
734Christopher Hunt OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 60%3,939
735Dennis G. Katz WHITE PLAINS 60%2,103
736Steve Lamb ATLANTA NORTH, GA 60%634
737Randi E. Lappin CHATTANOOGA, TN 60%3,151
738Elizabeth A. Lardaro SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 60%2,409
739Susanne Lewald SAN FRANCISCO, CA 60%301
740Joseph P. Lisiecki ORANGE, CA 60%267
741Raymond J. Malloy DALLAS NORTH, TX 60%320
742Edward Malvey MANCHESTER, NH 60%2,805
743Janet McCamley TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FL 60%2,981
744Sandra Morales Price ELKINS PARK, PA 60%2,955
745Dennis O'Leary NEWARK, NJ 60%1,837
746Nicholas M. Ohanesian GRAND RAPIDS, MI 60%4,000
747Leonard Olarsch NEWARK, NJ 60%1,001
748Windell R. Owens JACKSON, MS 60%654
749Katie H. Pierce NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NM 60%1,897
750Gerard J. Rickert PEORIA, IL 60%655
751Robin Rosenbluth LOS ANGELES WEST, CA 60%3,532
752Jack Russak JERSEY CITY, NJ 60%3,549
753Angela Saindon FT LAUDERDALE, FL 60%2,665
754Robert M. Senander OAK BROOK, IL 60%835
755Jennifer Gale Smith SYRACUSE, NY 60%3,874
756Regina Sobrino FLINT, MI 60%3,596
757Raymond L. Souza SPRINGFIELD MO, MO 60%1,215
758Michael J. Stacchini QUEENS, NY 60%3,297
759Carla Suffi CHICAGO, IL 60%3,730
760Dwight D. Wilkerson SAN ANTONIO, TX 60%3,311
761Harry L. Williams Jr. HOUSTON NORTH, TX 60%1,989
762Larry Banks NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 59%661
763Lawrence E. Blatnik LANSING, MI 59%2,616
764Scott A. Bryant WASHINGTON, DC 59%1,855
765Michelle D. Cavadi GREENSBORO, NC 59%3,902
766Nicholas Cerulli SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 59%2,281
767Adam Dale MT PLEASANT MI, MI 59%2,839
768Joanne E. Dantonio TACOMA, WA 59%1,427
769Elizabeth De Gruy JACKSON MS OHO, MS 59%2,041
770Michael R. Dunn FLINT, MI 59%2,741
771Carol A. Eckersen SACRAMENTO, CA 59%2,795
772Thomas W. Erwin ROANOKE, VA 59%4,082
773Scott C. Firestone GREENSBORO, NC 59%2,082
774F. P. Flanagan SYRACUSE, NY 59%102
775Gary A. Freyberg MADISON, WI 59%2,431
776John Gaffney PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZ 59%4,355
777William O. Gray CHATTANOOGA, TN 59%1,277
778Angelita Hamilton OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 59%3,563
779Ifeoma N. Iwuamadi NEW YORK, NY 59%3,404
780Todd D. Jacobson CHARLOTTE, NC 59%1,647
781Anthony J. Johnson RICHMOND, VA 59%276
782Christopher C. Knowdell SACRAMENTO, CA 59%3,959
783Richard LaFata CHARLESTON SC, SC 59%2,494
784John S. Lamb ATLANTA NORTH, GA 59%411
785Mary Lohr AKRON OH, OH 59%4,063
786Katherine Loo SAN FRANCISCO, CA 59%2,173
787Deborah Mande ELKINS PARK, PA 59%1,558
788Jeffrey Marvel TALLAHASSEE FL, FL 59%699
789Jack D. McCarthy KANSAS CITY, MO 59%983
790Nancy McCoy CHARLOTTE, NC 59%2,929
791Jennifer B. Millington DENVER, CO 59%3,730
792Breinne A. Mullins CHARLESTON WV, WV 59%908
793David S. Pang NHC BALTIMORE, MD 59%1,149
794Arthur Patane ALBANY, NY 59%2,966
795Troy M. Patterson FRANKLIN TN, TN 59%2,036
796Nicole Quandt FLINT, MI 59%3,507
797Donald A. Rising MIDDLESBORO, KY 59%1,052
798Joseph A. Rose CLEVELAND, OH 59%4,083
799Amy L. Rosenberg LANSING, MI 59%3,862
800David J. Shea RALEIGH, NC 59%2,733

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).