Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 801 | Donald A. Rising | MIDDLESBORO, KYLast decision Sep 2020 | 59% | 1,052 | |
| 802 | Joseph A. Rose | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 59% | 4,083 | |
| 803 | Amy L. Rosenberg | LANSING, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 59% | 3,862 | |
| 804 | David J. Shea | RALEIGH, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 59% | 2,733 | |
| 805 | Karen Shelton | NEWARK, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 59% | 3,498 | |
| 806 | Jennifer A. Simmons | DENVER, COLast decision Sep 2019 | 59% | 999 | |
| 807 | David Skidmore | CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 59% | 3,495 | |
| 808 | Sarah R. Smisek | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 59% | 3,690 | |
| 809 | John D. Sullivan | EUGENE, ORLast decision Jul 2026 | 59% | 4,204 | |
| 810 | Wallace Tannenbaum | NEW YORK, NYLast decision Sep 2017 | 59% | 376 | |
| 811 | Michael D. Tucevich | PHOENIX, AZLast decision Sep 2018 | 59% | 773 | |
| 812 | Thomas L. Walters | LANSING, MILast decision Sep 2018 | 59% | 960 | |
| 813 | Bruce H. Zwecker | HARTFORD, CTLast decision Sep 2017 | 59% | 184 | |
| 814 | Mara-Louise Anzalone | MT PLEASANT MI, MILast decision Sep 2016 | 58% | 115 | |
| 815 | Barbara Artuso | JOHNSTOWN, PALast decision Sep 2017 | 58% | 432 | |
| 816 | H.J. Barkley III | TUPELO, MSLast decision Sep 2025 | 58% | 3,973 | |
| 817 | K. Barlow | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Sep 2022 | 58% | 2,757 | |
| 818 | Timothy Belford | LAWRENCE MA, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 3,871 | |
| 819 | Lauren Logan Benedict | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 4,052 | |
| 820 | Jerome B. Blum | OAK PARK, MILast decision Sep 2016 | 58% | 172 | |
| 821 | Susan Brock | LOUISVILLE, KYLast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 3,680 | |
| 822 | Alison K. Brookins | WICHITA, KSLast decision Sep 2025 | 58% | 2,394 | |
| 823 | Daniel Curran | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Sep 2024 | 58% | 3,180 | |
| 824 | Sarah Cyrus | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Sep 2020 | 58% | 1,343 | |
| 825 | Robert A. DiBiccaro | NEW HAVEN, CTLast decision Sep 2017 | 58% | 539 | |
| 826 | Sandra R. DiMaggio Wallis | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2022 | 58% | 2,171 | |
| 827 | David K. Gatto | LAS VEGAS, NVLast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 4,078 | |
| 828 | Sara A. Gillis | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 4,273 | |
| 829 | Herbert J. Green | FORT WORTH, TXLast decision Sep 2019 | 58% | 1,552 | |
| 830 | Rhonda S. Greenberg | TAMPA, FLLast decision Sep 2018 | 58% | 422 | |
| 831 | William H. Hauser | RICHMOND, VALast decision Sep 2021 | 58% | 1,970 | |
| 832 | Richard Hlaudy | FARGO, NDLast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 3,672 | |
| 833 | Pamela Houston | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 4,504 | |
| 834 | Robert Iafe | SAN DIEGO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 2,411 | |
| 835 | Emily Kirk | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 3,058 | |
| 836 | Alexander Klibaner | BOSTON, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 2,938 | |
| 837 | Jon L. Lawritson | DENVER, COLast decision Sep 2018 | 58% | 963 | |
| 838 | Joseph P. Lisiecki III | ORANGE, CALast decision Sep 2025 | 58% | 3,046 | |
| 839 | Roger Lott | TUPELO, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 3,935 | |
| 840 | Raymond M. Lykins | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 788 | |
| 841 | Marilyn S. Mauer | TACOMA, WALast decision Sep 2020 | 58% | 1,414 | |
| 842 | Vivian McAneney | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Sep 2025 | 58% | 2,660 | |
| 843 | Steven J. Neary | FORT WAYNE, INLast decision Sep 2018 | 58% | 295 | |
| 844 | David F. Neumann | ALBANY, NYLast decision Sep 2024 | 58% | 2,687 | |
| 845 | James P. Nguyen | NORWALK, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 3,919 | |
| 846 | Angele Pietrangelo | NASHVILLE, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 4,041 | |
| 847 | Michael D. Quayle | MINNEAPOLIS, MNLast decision Sep 2016 | 58% | 445 | |
| 848 | Michael B. Richardson | SAN DIEGO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 3,409 | |
| 849 | Sherman D. Schwartzberg | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Sep 2022 | 58% | 3,208 | |
| 850 | William Spalo | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Sep 2024 | 58% | 3,226 | |
| 851 | Carl E. Stephan | ALBANY, NYLast decision Sep 2020 | 58% | 1,851 | |
| 852 | David Suna | JERSEY CITY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 2,873 | |
| 853 | Scott R. Tirrell | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 58% | 3,148 | |
| 854 | Jill Lolley Vincent | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2018 | 58% | 458 | |
| 855 | James D. Wascher | DENVER, COLast decision Sep 2023 | 58% | 1,788 | |
| 856 | Gregory White | NHC ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Sep 2025 | 58% | 2,733 | |
| 857 | Rebecca Adams | FAYETTEVILLE NC, NCLast decision Sep 2025 | 57% | 3,098 | |
| 858 | B. T. Amos | COVINGTON GA, GALast decision Sep 2018 | 57% | 1,239 | |
| 859 | Jose Anglada | CHICAGO, ILLast decision Sep 2019 | 57% | 1,389 | |
| 860 | Clara H. Aranda | MIAMI OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 2,461 | |
| 861 | Eskunder Boyd | NEW HAVEN, CTLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 4,136 | |
| 862 | Edward L. Brady | WILKES BARRE, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 4,037 | |
| 863 | Matthew Bring | OMAHA, NELast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 2,351 | |
| 864 | Cynthia W. Brown | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2025 | 57% | 3,215 | |
| 865 | John Clady | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Sep 2024 | 57% | 155 | |
| 866 | Paul Coulter | NORWALK, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,639 | |
| 867 | Malik Cutlar | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 2,697 | |
| 868 | Anthony Dziepak | LAWRENCE MA, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,674 | |
| 869 | Eric Eklund | RICHMOND, VALast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,992 | |
| 870 | Leah Farrell | NEWARK, NJLast decision Sep 2017 | 57% | 260 | |
| 871 | Stacey L. Foster | LOUISVILLE, KYLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,554 | |
| 872 | Dale A. Garwal | SANTA BARBARA, CALast decision Sep 2016 | 57% | 355 | |
| 873 | Christine A. Guard | MACON, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 1,972 | |
| 874 | Cynthia K. Hale | DENVER, COLast decision Sep 2022 | 57% | 2,203 | |
| 875 | Linda J. Helm | PORTLAND ME, MELast decision Sep 2019 | 57% | 1,297 | |
| 876 | Walter C. Herin Jr. | COLUMBIA SC, SCLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,488 | |
| 877 | Clinton C. Hicks | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Sep 2021 | 57% | 2,104 | |
| 878 | Elana Hollo | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,409 | |
| 879 | Brian Jones | HATTIESBURG, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,074 | |
| 880 | Patricia Kendall | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Sep 2020 | 57% | 1,206 | |
| 881 | Henry Koltys | SANTA BARBARA, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,061 | |
| 882 | John K. Kraybill | OAK BROOK, ILLast decision Sep 2017 | 57% | 467 | |
| 883 | Dina LaMarche | VALPARAISO IN, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 1,109 | |
| 884 | Bruce Landrum | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,414 | |
| 885 | Richard P. Laverdure | OAKLAND, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 57% | 814 | |
| 886 | Dennis LeBlanc | TULSA OHO, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,808 | |
| 887 | Suzanne A. Littlefield | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 2,480 | |
| 888 | Mikel Lupisella | MT PLEASANT MI, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,674 | |
| 889 | Steve Lynch | PORTLAND OR, ORLast decision Sep 2021 | 57% | 2,681 | |
| 890 | Kevin R. Martin | EVANSVILLE, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 4,188 | |
| 891 | Lisa B. Martin | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,874 | |
| 892 | John L. Melanson | PORTLAND ME, MELast decision Sep 2018 | 57% | 982 | |
| 893 | Richard J. Ortiz-Valero | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,799 | |
| 894 | Jennifer Overstreet | DETROIT, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,121 | |
| 895 | Robin R. Palenske | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2020 | 57% | 1,239 | |
| 896 | Joanna Papazekos | PITTSBURGH, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 3,150 | |
| 897 | Joan E. Parks Saunders | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2023 | 57% | 103 | |
| 898 | William D. Pierson | FORT WAYNE, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 57% | 4,404 | |
| 899 | Danny Pittman | STOCKTON, CALast decision Sep 2017 | 57% | 494 | |
| 900 | John J. Porter | PITTSBURGH, PALast decision Sep 2024 | 57% | 2,916 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.