All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 9 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 801–900 of 2044 judges
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
3,498
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
999
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
3,495
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
3,690
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
4,204
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
376
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
773
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
960
Office
Approval Rate
59%
Decisions
184
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
115
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
432
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,973
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
2,757
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,871
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
4,052
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
172
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,680
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
2,394
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,180
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
1,343
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
539
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
2,171
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
4,078
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
4,273
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
1,552
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
422
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
1,970
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,672
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
4,504
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
2,411
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,058
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
2,938
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
963
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,046
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,935
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
788
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
1,414
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
2,660
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
295
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
2,687
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,919
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
4,041
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
445
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,409
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,208
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,226
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
1,851
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
2,873
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
3,148
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
458
Office
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
1,788
Approval Rate
58%
Decisions
2,733
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,098
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
1,239
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
1,389
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,461
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
4,136
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
4,037
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,351
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,215
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
155
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,639
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,697
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
382
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,674
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,992
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
260
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,554
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
355
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
1,972
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,203
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
1,297
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,488
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,104
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,409
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,074
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
1,206
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,061
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
467
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
1,109
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,414
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
814
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,808
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,480
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,674
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,681
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
4,188
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,874
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
982
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,799
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,121
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
1,239
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,150
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
103
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
4,404
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
494
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,916
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
808
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,907
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
323
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
801Karen Shelton NEWARK, NJ 59%3,498
802Jennifer A. Simmons DENVER, CO 59%999
803David Skidmore CHICAGO, IL 59%3,495
804Sarah R. Smisek LIVONIA MI, MI 59%3,690
805John D. Sullivan EUGENE, OR 59%4,204
806Wallace Tannenbaum NEW YORK, NY 59%376
807Michael D. Tucevich PHOENIX, AZ 59%773
808Thomas L. Walters LANSING, MI 59%960
809Bruce H. Zwecker HARTFORD, CT 59%184
810Mara-Louise Anzalone MT PLEASANT MI, MI 58%115
811Barbara Artuso JOHNSTOWN, PA 58%432
812H.J. Barkley III TUPELO, MS 58%3,973
813K. Barlow JACKSONVILLE, FL 58%2,757
814Timothy Belford LAWRENCE MA, MA 58%3,871
815Lauren Logan Benedict CHATTANOOGA, TN 58%4,052
816Jerome B. Blum OAK PARK, MI 58%172
817Susan Brock LOUISVILLE, KY 58%3,680
818Alison K. Brookins WICHITA, KS 58%2,394
819Daniel Curran DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 58%3,180
820Sarah Cyrus ORLANDO, FL 58%1,343
821Robert A. DiBiccaro NEW HAVEN, CT 58%539
822Sandra R. DiMaggio Wallis ATLANTA NORTH, GA 58%2,171
823David K. Gatto LAS VEGAS, NV 58%4,078
824Sara A. Gillis SACRAMENTO, CA 58%4,273
825Herbert J. Green FORT WORTH, TX 58%1,552
826Rhonda S. Greenberg TAMPA, FL 58%422
827William H. Hauser RICHMOND, VA 58%1,970
828Richard Hlaudy FARGO, ND 58%3,672
829Pamela Houston ORLANDO, FL 58%4,504
830Robert Iafe SAN DIEGO, CA 58%2,411
831Emily Kirk ORLANDO, FL 58%3,058
832Alexander Klibaner BOSTON, MA 58%2,938
833Jon L. Lawritson DENVER, CO 58%963
834Joseph P. Lisiecki III ORANGE, CA 58%3,046
835Roger Lott TUPELO, MS 58%3,935
836Raymond M. Lykins ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 58%788
837Marilyn S. Mauer TACOMA, WA 58%1,414
838Vivian McAneney ELKINS PARK, PA 58%2,660
839Steven J. Neary FORT WAYNE, IN 58%295
840David F. Neumann ALBANY, NY 58%2,687
841James P. Nguyen NORWALK, CA 58%3,919
842Angele Pietrangelo NASHVILLE, TN 58%4,041
843Michael D. Quayle MINNEAPOLIS, MN 58%445
844Michael B. Richardson SAN DIEGO, CA 58%3,409
845Sherman D. Schwartzberg KINGSPORT, TN 58%3,208
846William Spalo SACRAMENTO, CA 58%3,226
847Carl E. Stephan ALBANY, NY 58%1,851
848David Suna JERSEY CITY, NJ 58%2,873
849Scott R. Tirrell LONG ISLAND, NY 58%3,148
850Jill Lolley Vincent BIRMINGHAM, AL 58%458
851James D. Wascher DENVER, CO 58%1,788
852Gregory White NHC ST LOUIS, MO 58%2,733
853Rebecca Adams FAYETTEVILLE NC, NC 57%3,098
854B. T. Amos COVINGTON GA, GA 57%1,239
855Jose Anglada CHICAGO, IL 57%1,389
856Clara H. Aranda MIAMI OHO, FL 57%2,461
857Eskunder Boyd NEW HAVEN, CT 57%4,136
858Edward L. Brady WILKES BARRE, PA 57%4,037
859Matthew Bring OMAHA, NE 57%2,351
860Cynthia W. Brown BIRMINGHAM, AL 57%3,215
861John Clady PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 57%155
862Paul Coulter NORWALK, CA 57%3,639
863Malik Cutlar WASHINGTON, DC 57%2,697
864Christopher L. Dillon NHC BALTIMORE, MD 57%382
865Anthony Dziepak LAWRENCE MA, MA 57%3,674
866Eric Eklund RICHMOND, VA 57%3,992
867Leah Farrell NEWARK, NJ 57%260
868Stacey L. Foster LOUISVILLE, KY 57%3,554
869Dale A. Garwal SANTA BARBARA, CA 57%355
870Christine A. Guard MACON, GA 57%1,972
871Cynthia K. Hale DENVER, CO 57%2,203
872Linda J. Helm PORTLAND ME, ME 57%1,297
873Walter C. Herin Jr. COLUMBIA SC, SC 57%3,488
874Clinton C. Hicks CHARLOTTE, NC 57%2,104
875Elana Hollo ELKINS PARK, PA 57%3,409
876Brian Jones HATTIESBURG, MS 57%3,074
877Patricia Kendall EVANSTON, IL 57%1,206
878Henry Koltys SANTA BARBARA, CA 57%3,061
879John K. Kraybill OAK BROOK, IL 57%467
880Dina LaMarche VALPARAISO IN, IN 57%1,109
881Bruce Landrum JACKSONVILLE, FL 57%3,414
882Richard P. Laverdure OAKLAND, CA 57%814
883Dennis LeBlanc TULSA OHO, OK 57%3,808
884Suzanne A. Littlefield ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 57%2,480
885Mikel Lupisella MT PLEASANT MI, MI 57%3,674
886Steve Lynch PORTLAND OR, OR 57%2,681
887Kevin R. Martin EVANSVILLE, IN 57%4,188
888Lisa B. Martin SACRAMENTO, CA 57%3,874
889John L. Melanson PORTLAND ME, ME 57%982
890Richard J. Ortiz-Valero FT LAUDERDALE, FL 57%3,799
891Jennifer Overstreet DETROIT, MI 57%3,121
892Robin R. Palenske ATLANTA NORTH, GA 57%1,239
893Joanna Papazekos PITTSBURGH, PA 57%3,150
894Joan E. Parks Saunders ATLANTA NORTH, GA 57%103
895William D. Pierson FORT WAYNE, IN 57%4,404
896Danny Pittman STOCKTON, CA 57%494
897John J. Porter PITTSBURGH, PA 57%2,916
898Mary M. Renfroe KINGSPORT, TN 57%808
899Fredric Roberson INDIANAPOLIS, IN 57%3,907
900Robert S. Robison ST LOUIS, MO 57%323

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).