Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Linda S. Halperin | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Sep 2018 | 79% | 605 | |
| 102 | Melinda K. Hart | COVINGTON GA, GALast decision Jul 2021 | 79% | 2,271 | |
| 103 | Julia Mariani | SAN RAFAEL, CALast decision Sep 2024 | 79% | 2,467 | |
| 104 | Saul W. Nathanson | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Sep 2016 | 79% | 104 | |
| 105 | George W. Reyes | TUCSON, AZLast decision Sep 2023 | 79% | 2,481 | |
| 106 | Claire R. Strong | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Sep 2025 | 79% | 3,544 | |
| 107 | Gregory O. Varo | LEXINGTON, KYLast decision Sep 2019 | 79% | 1,313 | |
| 108 | Lucian A. Vecchio | NEW YORK, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 79% | 2,032 | |
| 109 | Sheena Barr | JERSEY CITY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 78% | 3,091 | |
| 110 | Valerie A. Bawolek | CHARLESTON WV, WVLast decision Sep 2025 | 78% | 4,004 | |
| 111 | Beth J. Contorer | OAK PARK, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 78% | 3,398 | |
| 112 | Gene Duncan | TACOMA, WALast decision Sep 2017 | 78% | 417 | |
| 113 | Edward H. Hein | NEW YORK VARICK, NYLast decision Sep 2019 | 78% | 1,024 | |
| 114 | Randall D. Huggins | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 78% | 3,936 | |
| 115 | George W. Jenkins III | MEMPHIS, TNLast decision Sep 2022 | 78% | 2,581 | |
| 116 | Robert E. Lowenstein | LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 78% | 720 | |
| 117 | Phillip C. Lyman | SAN JOSE, CALast decision Sep 2022 | 78% | 2,090 | |
| 118 | Timothy Maher | MIAMI, FLLast decision Sep 2018 | 78% | 476 | |
| 119 | Debra Meachum | MADISON, WILast decision Sep 2022 | 78% | 2,376 | |
| 120 | John M. Meisburg Jr. | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Sep 2021 | 78% | 1,993 | |
| 121 | Cynthia A. Minter | NORWALK, CALast decision Sep 2025 | 78% | 1,863 | |
| 122 | Kathleen Mucerino | PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZLast decision Sep 2025 | 78% | 3,164 | |
| 123 | Melody Paige | OAK PARK, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 78% | 4,266 | |
| 124 | Marshall D. Riley | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Sep 2023 | 78% | 3,457 | |
| 125 | Eduardo Soto | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Sep 2018 | 78% | 853 | |
| 126 | Margo Stone | FAYETTEVILLE NC, NCLast decision Sep 2024 | 78% | 3,293 | |
| 127 | Donna L. Walker | SPOKANE, WALast decision Jul 2026 | 78% | 3,997 | |
| 128 | William Wallis | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 78% | 3,777 | |
| 129 | Jonathan L. Wesner | PHILADELPHIA, PALast decision Sep 2019 | 78% | 1,066 | |
| 130 | G. Roderic Anderson | OMAHA, NELast decision Sep 2019 | 77% | 506 | |
| 131 | Kenneth Bossong | SOUTH JERSEY, NJLast decision Sep 2017 | 77% | 694 | |
| 132 | David J. DeLaittre | OMAHA, NELast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 3,551 | |
| 133 | Thomas C. Gray | NEW YORK VARICK, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 3,244 | |
| 134 | Grenville W. Harrop Jr. | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2017 | 77% | 266 | |
| 135 | William Lawson | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2025 | 77% | 3,520 | |
| 136 | Thomas M. Muth | MOBILE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 266 | |
| 137 | Mark Naggi | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 3,294 | |
| 138 | Connor O'Brien | ROCHESTER, NYLast decision Sep 2024 | 77% | 2,428 | |
| 139 | Stacy Paddack | TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 3,150 | |
| 140 | Moises Penalver | NEW YORK, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 77% | 2,314 | |
| 141 | Joshua Pinkus | SPRINGFIELD MA, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 822 | |
| 142 | Chester G. Senf | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Sep 2016 | 77% | 396 | |
| 143 | Ben E. Sheely | MOBILE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 3,231 | |
| 144 | Linda A. Stagno | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 1,834 | |
| 145 | Kathleen H. Switzer | SALT LAKE CITY, UTLast decision Sep 2020 | 77% | 1,246 | |
| 146 | Claudia Travis | OAK BROOK, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 1,046 | |
| 147 | Brian Turner | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 3,459 | |
| 148 | Kimberly Varillo | SOUTH JERSEY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 2,830 | |
| 149 | Gabrielle R. Vitellio | TOLEDO OH, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 77% | 3,025 | |
| 150 | Kenneth Wilson | CINCINNATI, OHLast decision Sep 2019 | 77% | 939 | |
| 151 | Ashley L. Bumgarner | COLUMBIA SC, SCLast decision Jul 2026 | 76% | 1,251 | |
| 152 | Robert F. Campbell | SAN RAFAEL, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 76% | 3,574 | |
| 153 | Kathleen Cornell | SOUTH JERSEY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 76% | 1,006 | |
| 154 | Lawrence J. Duran | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Sep 2023 | 76% | 2,824 | |
| 155 | James S. Elkins | HATTIESBURG, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 76% | 3,542 | |
| 156 | Robert W. Flynn | PORTLAND ME, MELast decision Jul 2026 | 76% | 3,299 | |
| 157 | Donald E. Garrison | FRANKLIN TN, TNLast decision Sep 2017 | 76% | 878 | |
| 158 | Robert Gill | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Sep 2022 | 76% | 1,410 | |
| 159 | Larry E. Johnson | TUCSON, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 76% | 3,746 | |
| 160 | E. M. Koldewey | LONG BEACH, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 76% | 532 | |
| 161 | C. F. Moore | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Sep 2020 | 76% | 1,216 | |
| 162 | James L. Moser | LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CALast decision Sep 2021 | 76% | 2,128 | |
| 163 | Jose Perez-Gonzalez | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Sep 2024 | 76% | 2,082 | |
| 164 | Marty R. Pillion | JOHNSTOWN, PALast decision Sep 2022 | 76% | 1,643 | |
| 165 | Ramon Suris-Fernandez | NHC BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2020 | 76% | 1,509 | |
| 166 | Steven H. Templin | OAK BROOK, ILLast decision Sep 2019 | 76% | 831 | |
| 167 | Glynn F. Voisin | NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Sep 2019 | 76% | 1,321 | |
| 168 | Douglas A. Wright | FLORENCE, ALLast decision Sep 2024 | 76% | 2,372 | |
| 169 | David M. Blume | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 75% | 4,517 | |
| 170 | John R. Burgess | NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Sep 2021 | 75% | 1,743 | |
| 171 | John E. Case | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 75% | 4,556 | |
| 172 | James J. D'Alessandro | MANCHESTER, NHLast decision Sep 2017 | 75% | 472 | |
| 173 | Robert C. Dorf | NEW YORK, NYLast decision Sep 2019 | 75% | 877 | |
| 174 | F. T. Eckert Jr. | ST PETERSBURG FL, FLLast decision Sep 2016 | 75% | 336 | |
| 175 | Peter Jamison | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 75% | 4,013 | |
| 176 | Jon K. Johnson | CHARLESTON WV, WVLast decision Sep 2020 | 75% | 1,623 | |
| 177 | Sasha Kurbegov | DENVER, COLast decision Jul 2026 | 75% | 1,094 | |
| 178 | David R. Mazzi | OAKLAND, CALast decision Sep 2022 | 75% | 2,300 | |
| 179 | Kim McClain-Leazure | MOBILE, ALLast decision Sep 2017 | 75% | 293 | |
| 180 | V. Paul McGinn | PROVIDENCE, RILast decision Sep 2021 | 75% | 2,801 | |
| 181 | Roger A. Nelson | MOBILE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 75% | 3,180 | |
| 182 | Gitel Reich | NEW YORK, NYLast decision Sep 2022 | 75% | 1,908 | |
| 183 | Carol A. Sax | BOSTON, MALast decision Sep 2021 | 75% | 1,792 | |
| 184 | Daniel J. Stein | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Sep 2019 | 75% | 1,351 | |
| 185 | John A. Thawley | FAYETTEVILLE NC, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 75% | 3,223 | |
| 186 | Charles A. Thigpen | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Sep 2019 | 75% | 1,362 | |
| 187 | Daniel A. Traver | LOUISVILLE, KYLast decision Sep 2018 | 75% | 1,052 | |
| 188 | Joy Turner | DETROIT, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 75% | 4,044 | |
| 189 | Calvin Washington | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2019 | 75% | 1,426 | |
| 190 | David L. Welch | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Sep 2017 | 75% | 752 | |
| 191 | Rebecca D. Westfall | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Sep 2016 | 75% | 349 | |
| 192 | H. S. Williams | NASHVILLE, TNLast decision Sep 2019 | 75% | 1,426 | |
| 193 | William Andersen | RALEIGH, NCLast decision Sep 2025 | 74% | 3,241 | |
| 194 | Lovert F. Bassett | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 74% | 4,252 | |
| 195 | John A. Beall | COLORADO SPRINGS, COLast decision Sep 2017 | 74% | 157 | |
| 196 | Mark A. Brown | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Sep 2019 | 74% | 194 | |
| 197 | Mary S. Connolly | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Sep 2019 | 74% | 1,461 | |
| 198 | Alma S. de Leon | PITTSBURGH, PALast decision Sep 2020 | 74% | 1,286 | |
| 199 | Michael W. Devlin | ROCHESTER, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 74% | 3,692 | |
| 200 | John J. Flanagan | OAKLAND, CALast decision Sep 2022 | 74% | 2,072 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.