All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 2 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 101–200 of 2044 judges
Office
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
605
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
2,271
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
2,467
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
104
Office
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
2,481
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
3,544
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
1,313
Office
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
2,032
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
3,091
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
4,004
Office
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
3,398
Office
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
417
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
1,024
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
3,936
Office
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
2,581
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
720
Office
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
2,090
Office
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
476
Office
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
2,376
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
1,993
Office
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
1,863
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
3,164
Office
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
4,266
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
3,457
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
853
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
3,293
Office
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
3,997
Office
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
3,777
Approval Rate
78%
Decisions
1,066
Office
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
506
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
694
Office
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
3,551
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
3,244
Office
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
266
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
3,520
Office
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
266
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
3,294
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
2,428
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
3,150
Office
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
2,314
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
822
Office
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
396
Office
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
3,231
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
1,834
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
1,246
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
1,046
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
3,459
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
2,830
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
3,025
Approval Rate
77%
Decisions
939
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
1,251
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
3,574
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
1,006
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
2,824
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
3,542
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
3,299
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
878
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
1,410
Office
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
3,746
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
532
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
1,216
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
2,128
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
2,082
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
1,643
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
1,509
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
831
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
1,321
Office
Approval Rate
76%
Decisions
2,372
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
4,517
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
1,743
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
4,556
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
472
Office
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
877
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
336
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
4,013
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
1,623
Office
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
1,094
Office
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
2,300
Office
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
293
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
2,801
Office
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
3,180
Office
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
1,908
Office
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
1,792
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
1,351
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
3,223
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
1,362
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
1,052
Office
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
4,044
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
1,426
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
752
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
349
Approval Rate
75%
Decisions
1,426
Office
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
3,241
Office
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
4,252
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
157
Office
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
194
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
1,461
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
1,286
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
3,692
Office
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
2,072
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
101Linda S. Halperin EVANSTON, IL 79%605
102Melinda K. Hart COVINGTON GA, GA 79%2,271
103Julia Mariani SAN RAFAEL, CA 79%2,467
104Saul W. Nathanson CHARLOTTE, NC 79%104
105George W. Reyes TUCSON, AZ 79%2,481
106Claire R. Strong MONTGOMERY, AL 79%3,544
107Gregory O. Varo LEXINGTON, KY 79%1,313
108Lucian A. Vecchio NEW YORK, NY 79%2,032
109Sheena Barr JERSEY CITY, NJ 78%3,091
110Valerie A. Bawolek CHARLESTON WV, WV 78%4,004
111Beth J. Contorer OAK PARK, MI 78%3,398
112Gene Duncan TACOMA, WA 78%417
113Edward H. Hein NEW YORK VARICK, NY 78%1,024
114Randall D. Huggins CHARLOTTE, NC 78%3,936
115George W. Jenkins III MEMPHIS, TN 78%2,581
116Robert E. Lowenstein LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CA 78%720
117Phillip C. Lyman SAN JOSE, CA 78%2,090
118Timothy Maher MIAMI, FL 78%476
119Debra Meachum MADISON, WI 78%2,376
120John M. Meisburg Jr. JACKSONVILLE, FL 78%1,993
121Cynthia A. Minter NORWALK, CA 78%1,863
122Kathleen Mucerino PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZ 78%3,164
123Melody Paige OAK PARK, MI 78%4,266
124Marshall D. Riley KINGSPORT, TN 78%3,457
125Eduardo Soto CHATTANOOGA, TN 78%853
126Margo Stone FAYETTEVILLE NC, NC 78%3,293
127Donna L. Walker SPOKANE, WA 78%3,997
128William Wallis ST LOUIS, MO 78%3,777
129Jonathan L. Wesner PHILADELPHIA, PA 78%1,066
130G. Roderic Anderson OMAHA, NE 77%506
131Kenneth Bossong SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 77%694
132David J. DeLaittre OMAHA, NE 77%3,551
133Thomas C. Gray NEW YORK VARICK, NY 77%3,244
134Grenville W. Harrop Jr. BUFFALO, NY 77%266
135William Lawson BIRMINGHAM, AL 77%3,520
136Thomas M. Muth MOBILE, AL 77%266
137Mark Naggi KANSAS CITY, MO 77%3,294
138Connor O'Brien ROCHESTER, NY 77%2,428
139Stacy Paddack TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FL 77%3,150
140Moises Penalver NEW YORK, NY 77%2,314
141Joshua Pinkus SPRINGFIELD MA, MA 77%822
142Chester G. Senf ORLANDO, FL 77%396
143Ben E. Sheely MOBILE, AL 77%3,231
144Linda A. Stagno LONG ISLAND, NY 77%1,834
145Kathleen H. Switzer SALT LAKE CITY, UT 77%1,246
146Claudia Travis OAK BROOK, IL 77%1,046
147Brian Turner BIRMINGHAM, AL 77%3,459
148Kimberly Varillo SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 77%2,830
149Gabrielle R. Vitellio TOLEDO OH, OH 77%3,025
150Kenneth Wilson CINCINNATI, OH 77%939
151Ashley L. Bumgarner COLUMBIA SC, SC 76%1,251
152Robert F. Campbell SAN RAFAEL, CA 76%3,574
153Kathleen Cornell SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 76%1,006
154Lawrence J. Duran SACRAMENTO, CA 76%2,824
155James S. Elkins HATTIESBURG, MS 76%3,542
156Robert W. Flynn PORTLAND ME, ME 76%3,299
157Donald E. Garrison FRANKLIN TN, TN 76%878
158Robert Gill FT LAUDERDALE, FL 76%1,410
159Larry E. Johnson TUCSON, AZ 76%3,746
160E. M. Koldewey LONG BEACH, CA 76%532
161C. F. Moore DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 76%1,216
162James L. Moser LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CA 76%2,128
163Jose Perez-Gonzalez FT LAUDERDALE, FL 76%2,082
164Marty R. Pillion JOHNSTOWN, PA 76%1,643
165Ramon Suris-Fernandez NHC BALTIMORE, MD 76%1,509
166Steven H. Templin OAK BROOK, IL 76%831
167Glynn F. Voisin NEW ORLEANS, LA 76%1,321
168Douglas A. Wright FLORENCE, AL 76%2,372
169David M. Blume SACRAMENTO, CA 75%4,517
170John R. Burgess NEW ORLEANS, LA 75%1,743
171John E. Case CHATTANOOGA, TN 75%4,556
172James J. D'Alessandro MANCHESTER, NH 75%472
173Robert C. Dorf NEW YORK, NY 75%877
174F. T. Eckert Jr. ST PETERSBURG FL, FL 75%336
175Peter Jamison CHARLOTTE, NC 75%4,013
176Jon K. Johnson CHARLESTON WV, WV 75%1,623
177Sasha Kurbegov DENVER, CO 75%1,094
178David R. Mazzi OAKLAND, CA 75%2,300
179Kim McClain-Leazure MOBILE, AL 75%293
180V. Paul McGinn PROVIDENCE, RI 75%2,801
181Roger A. Nelson MOBILE, AL 75%3,180
182Gitel Reich NEW YORK, NY 75%1,908
183Carol A. Sax BOSTON, MA 75%1,792
184Daniel J. Stein GREENSBORO, NC 75%1,351
185John A. Thawley FAYETTEVILLE NC, NC 75%3,223
186Charles A. Thigpen MONTGOMERY, AL 75%1,362
187Daniel A. Traver LOUISVILLE, KY 75%1,052
188Joy Turner DETROIT, MI 75%4,044
189Calvin Washington ATLANTA NORTH, GA 75%1,426
190David L. Welch INDIANAPOLIS, IN 75%752
191Rebecca D. Westfall DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 75%349
192H. S. Williams NASHVILLE, TN 75%1,426
193William Andersen RALEIGH, NC 74%3,241
194Lovert F. Bassett EVANSTON, IL 74%4,252
195John A. Beall COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 74%157
196Mark A. Brown ST LOUIS, MO 74%194
197Mary S. Connolly LIVONIA MI, MI 74%1,461
198Alma S. de Leon PITTSBURGH, PA 74%1,286
199Michael W. Devlin ROCHESTER, NY 74%3,692
200John J. Flanagan OAKLAND, CA 74%2,072

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).