Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1201 | R. N. Owen | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Sep 2016 | 52% | 306 | |
| 1202 | Henry Perez Jr. | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Sep 2017 | 52% | 498 | |
| 1203 | Lisa Raleigh | TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 52% | 3,103 | |
| 1204 | William P. Reeves | EUGENE, ORLast decision Jul 2026 | 52% | 1,277 | |
| 1205 | Karen Robinson | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Sep 2018 | 52% | 600 | |
| 1206 | Vicky Ruth | COLUMBIA MO, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 52% | 3,873 | |
| 1207 | Michael Sauve | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 52% | 1,264 | |
| 1208 | Timothy C. Scallen | OAK PARK, MILast decision Sep 2022 | 52% | 2,543 | |
| 1209 | Janice E. Shave | RENO, NVLast decision Sep 2021 | 52% | 1,077 | |
| 1210 | Barbara Sheehe | AKRON OH, OHLast decision Sep 2016 | 52% | 106 | |
| 1211 | William Shenkenberg | MILWAUKEE, WILast decision Jul 2026 | 52% | 3,709 | |
| 1212 | Clary Simmonds | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Jul 2026 | 52% | 2,887 | |
| 1213 | Emily R. Statum | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 52% | 3,876 | |
| 1214 | Helen Valkavich | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 52% | 2,629 | |
| 1215 | Kelly Walls | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 52% | 3,363 | |
| 1216 | April M. Wexler | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Sep 2022 | 52% | 1,823 | |
| 1217 | Lori J. Williams | FLORENCE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 52% | 3,453 | |
| 1218 | Michael S. Worrall | EVANSVILLE, INLast decision Sep 2022 | 52% | 2,116 | |
| 1219 | Randolph W. Alden | NASHVILLE, TNLast decision Sep 2023 | 51% | 1,677 | |
| 1220 | Christel Ambuehl | FARGO, NDLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,598 | |
| 1221 | Earl Ashford | TOLEDO OH, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 4,512 | |
| 1222 | Bryce Baird | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 2,715 | |
| 1223 | Maxine R. Benmour | SAN RAFAEL, CALast decision Sep 2016 | 51% | 199 | |
| 1224 | Debra L. Boudreau | COLORADO SPRINGS, COLast decision Sep 2025 | 51% | 3,182 | |
| 1225 | Luke A. Brennan | BILLINGS, MTLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 4,513 | |
| 1226 | Maryann S. Bright | NORFOLK, VALast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,847 | |
| 1227 | Sherrill A. L. Carvalho | FORT WORTH, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 4,137 | |
| 1228 | Benjamin Chaykin | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,711 | |
| 1229 | Michael K. Dennard | SAVANNAH, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,679 | |
| 1230 | Lyle Eastham | LEXINGTON, KYLast decision Sep 2025 | 51% | 1,111 | |
| 1231 | Paul Elkin | COLUMBIA SC, SCLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,485 | |
| 1232 | Andrew M. Emerson | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 2,939 | |
| 1233 | Roxanne Fuller | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,539 | |
| 1234 | J. Frederick Gatzke | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Sep 2016 | 51% | 182 | |
| 1235 | Richard Geib | PORTLAND OR, ORLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,626 | |
| 1236 | Richard A. Gilbert | HOUSTON WEST, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 4,442 | |
| 1237 | S. Andrew Grace | TACOMA, WALast decision Sep 2018 | 51% | 1,097 | |
| 1238 | Gordon W. Griggs | SEATTLE, WALast decision Sep 2017 | 51% | 451 | |
| 1239 | Donna J. Grit | GRAND RAPIDS, MILast decision Sep 2023 | 51% | 2,149 | |
| 1240 | Christina Hajjar | HUNTINGTON WV, WVLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 1,249 | |
| 1241 | Holly Hansen | METAIRIE, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,896 | |
| 1242 | Therese A. Hardiman | WILKES BARRE, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 2,976 | |
| 1243 | I. K. Harrington | NEW HAVEN, CTLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,056 | |
| 1244 | Virginia Herring | OAK PARK, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,861 | |
| 1245 | Teresa L. Hoskins-Hart | RALEIGH, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,435 | |
| 1246 | William B. Howard | HOUSTON NORTH, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 4,291 | |
| 1247 | F. J. Hughes | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Sep 2017 | 51% | 658 | |
| 1248 | Erin Justice | DENVER, COLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 4,076 | |
| 1249 | Peter Kafkas | ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,395 | |
| 1250 | Keith J. Kearney | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,838 | |
| 1251 | Mark Kim | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,945 | |
| 1252 | Melinda W. Kirkpatrick | SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 4,514 | |
| 1253 | Jerry M. Lang | MEMPHIS, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,779 | |
| 1254 | Jennifer M. Lash | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,153 | |
| 1255 | Tracey B. Leibowitz | MIAMI OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,860 | |
| 1256 | Lee Lewin | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Sep 2025 | 51% | 3,023 | |
| 1257 | Robert A. Lynch | SPRINGFIELD MO, MOLast decision Sep 2024 | 51% | 1,976 | |
| 1258 | Evelyn Maiben | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,971 | |
| 1259 | Joseph T. Marcee | LONG BEACH, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 670 | |
| 1260 | Mary Mattimore | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2021 | 51% | 1,413 | |
| 1261 | Kathleen McDade | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Sep 2025 | 51% | 2,734 | |
| 1262 | Peggy McFadden-Elmore | CHARLESTON SC, SCLast decision Sep 2019 | 51% | 1,081 | |
| 1263 | Mark J. Mendola | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 2,978 | |
| 1264 | Preston L. Mitchell | SALT LAKE CITY, UTLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,695 | |
| 1265 | Charles C. Pearce | HATTIESBURG, MSLast decision Sep 2018 | 51% | 1,110 | |
| 1266 | Dennis Lyndell Pickett | LOUISVILLE, KYLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,354 | |
| 1267 | Tiesh I. Reaves | JOHNSTOWN, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 1,407 | |
| 1268 | Gerald Resnick | PROVIDENCE, RILast decision Sep 2018 | 51% | 951 | |
| 1269 | Brenton L. Rogozen | SAN JOSE, CALast decision Sep 2019 | 51% | 1,562 | |
| 1270 | R. Dirk Selland | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 2,983 | |
| 1271 | Deanna L. Sokolski | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Sep 2025 | 51% | 2,508 | |
| 1272 | Noceeba Southern | TOLEDO OH, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 4,148 | |
| 1273 | Stephen M. Szymczak | PROVIDENCE, RILast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 1,277 | |
| 1274 | Jason P. Tepley | COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 1,313 | |
| 1275 | Jennifer B. Thomas | NASHVILLE, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,624 | |
| 1276 | Charles J. Thorbjornsen | VALPARAISO IN, INLast decision Sep 2023 | 51% | 2,665 | |
| 1277 | Regina L. Warren | PHILADELPHIA, PALast decision Sep 2025 | 51% | 2,730 | |
| 1278 | Luke Woltering | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 3,749 | |
| 1279 | Brian Yamada | MORENO VALLEY, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 887 | |
| 1280 | Marilyn D. Zahm | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2019 | 51% | 129 | |
| 1281 | William C. Zuber | LOUISVILLE, KYLast decision Jul 2026 | 51% | 4,082 | |
| 1282 | Theodore W. Annos | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Sep 2019 | 50% | 1,148 | |
| 1283 | Paul D. Barker | NHC BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Jul 2026 | 50% | 1,018 | |
| 1284 | John Benson | LAWRENCE MA, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 50% | 3,342 | |
| 1285 | J. Leland Bentley | MCALESTERLast decision Sep 2025 | 50% | 3,044 | |
| 1286 | Joseph Booth III | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Sep 2025 | 50% | 3,303 | |
| 1287 | Carol K. Bowen | FORT WORTH, TXLast decision Sep 2025 | 50% | 3,722 | |
| 1288 | Solomon Boyle | HOUSTON WEST, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 50% | 2,315 | |
| 1289 | Marilyn R. Brand | JACKSON MS OHO, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 50% | 4,257 | |
| 1290 | Cynthia M. Bretthauer | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Sep 2022 | 50% | 1,852 | |
| 1291 | Thomas D. Businger | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 50% | 2,340 | |
| 1292 | James Carberry | NORWALK, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 50% | 3,900 | |
| 1293 | Alison Crisman | VALPARAISO IN, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 50% | 1,284 | |
| 1294 | Jerry Faust | NHC ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Sep 2020 | 50% | 1,647 | |
| 1295 | Victoria A. Ferrer | ORLAND PARK, ILLast decision Sep 2024 | 50% | 2,667 | |
| 1296 | Margaret M. Gabell | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 50% | 3,713 | |
| 1297 | Steven C. Graalmann | ALEXANDRIA, LALast decision Sep 2016 | 50% | 146 | |
| 1298 | Donald M. Graffius | JOHNSTOWN, PALast decision Sep 2019 | 50% | 1,307 | |
| 1299 | Jeffrey Hartranft | COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 50% | 3,670 | |
| 1300 | Laura S. Havens | TUCSON, AZLast decision Sep 2025 | 50% | 3,993 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.