All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 13 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1201–1300 of 2044 judges
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,873
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
1,264
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,543
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
1,077
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
106
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,709
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,887
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,876
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,595
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,363
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
1,823
Office
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
3,453
Approval Rate
52%
Decisions
2,116
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,677
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,598
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
4,512
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
2,715
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
199
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,182
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
4,513
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,847
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
4,137
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,711
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,679
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,111
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,485
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
2,939
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,539
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
182
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,626
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
4,442
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,097
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
451
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
2,149
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,249
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,896
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
2,976
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,056
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,861
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,435
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
4,291
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
658
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
4,076
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,395
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,838
1246 Mark Kim
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,945
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
4,514
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,779
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,153
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,860
1251 Lee Lewin
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,023
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,976
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,971
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
670
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,413
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
2,734
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,081
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
2,978
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,695
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,110
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,354
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,407
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
951
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,562
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
2,983
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
2,508
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
4,148
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,277
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
1,313
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,624
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
2,665
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
2,730
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
3,749
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
887
Office
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
129
Approval Rate
51%
Decisions
4,082
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,148
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
812
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,342
Office
MCALESTER
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,044
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,303
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,722
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,315
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
4,257
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,852
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,340
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,900
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,284
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,647
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,667
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,713
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
146
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,307
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,670
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,993
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,973
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,115
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,009
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,234
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,294
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1201Vicky Ruth COLUMBIA MO, MO 52%3,873
1202Michael Sauve DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 52%1,264
1203Timothy C. Scallen OAK PARK, MI 52%2,543
1204Janice E. Shave RENO, NV 52%1,077
1205Barbara Sheehe AKRON OH, OH 52%106
1206William Shenkenberg MILWAUKEE, WI 52%3,709
1207Clary Simmonds BALTIMORE, MD 52%2,887
1208Emily R. Statum ORLANDO, FL 52%3,876
1209Helen Valkavich NHC CHICAGO, IL 52%2,595
1210Kelly Walls PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 52%3,363
1211April M. Wexler LONG ISLAND, NY 52%1,823
1212Lori J. Williams FLORENCE, AL 52%3,453
1213Michael S. Worrall EVANSVILLE, IN 52%2,116
1214Randolph W. Alden NASHVILLE, TN 51%1,677
1215Christel Ambuehl FARGO, ND 51%3,598
1216Earl Ashford TOLEDO OH, OH 51%4,512
1217Bryce Baird BUFFALO, NY 51%2,715
1218Maxine R. Benmour SAN RAFAEL, CA 51%199
1219Debra L. Boudreau COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 51%3,182
1220Luke A. Brennan BILLINGS, MT 51%4,513
1221Maryann S. Bright NORFOLK, VA 51%3,847
1222Sherrill A. L. Carvalho FORT WORTH, TX 51%4,137
1223Benjamin Chaykin WASHINGTON, DC 51%3,711
1224Michael K. Dennard SAVANNAH, GA 51%3,679
1225Lyle Eastham LEXINGTON, KY 51%1,111
1226Paul Elkin COLUMBIA SC, SC 51%3,485
1227Andrew M. Emerson WASHINGTON, DC 51%2,939
1228Roxanne Fuller NHC CHICAGO, IL 51%3,539
1229J. Frederick Gatzke DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 51%182
1230Richard Geib PORTLAND OR, OR 51%3,626
1231Richard A. Gilbert HOUSTON WEST, TX 51%4,442
1232S. Andrew Grace TACOMA, WA 51%1,097
1233Gordon W. Griggs SEATTLE, WA 51%451
1234Donna J. Grit GRAND RAPIDS, MI 51%2,149
1235Christina Hajjar HUNTINGTON WV, WV 51%1,249
1236Holly Hansen METAIRIE, LA 51%3,896
1237Therese A. Hardiman WILKES BARRE, PA 51%2,976
1238I. K. Harrington NEW HAVEN, CT 51%3,056
1239Virginia Herring OAK PARK, MI 51%3,861
1240Teresa L. Hoskins-Hart RALEIGH, NC 51%3,435
1241William B. Howard HOUSTON NORTH, TX 51%4,291
1242F. J. Hughes ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 51%658
1243Erin Justice DENVER, CO 51%4,076
1244Peter Kafkas ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 51%3,395
1245Keith J. Kearney CLEVELAND, OH 51%3,838
1246Mark Kim DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 51%3,945
1247Melinda W. Kirkpatrick SAN ANTONIO, TX 51%4,514
1248Jerry M. Lang MEMPHIS, TN 51%3,779
1249Jennifer M. Lash ELKINS PARK, PA 51%3,153
1250Tracey B. Leibowitz MIAMI OHO, FL 51%3,860
1251Lee Lewin EVANSTON, IL 51%3,023
1252Robert A. Lynch SPRINGFIELD MO, MO 51%1,976
1253Evelyn Maiben DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 51%3,971
1254Joseph T. Marcee LONG BEACH, CA 51%670
1255Mary Mattimore BUFFALO, NY 51%1,413
1256Kathleen McDade ELKINS PARK, PA 51%2,734
1257Peggy McFadden-Elmore CHARLESTON SC, SC 51%1,081
1258Mark J. Mendola DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 51%2,978
1259Preston L. Mitchell SALT LAKE CITY, UT 51%3,695
1260Charles C. Pearce HATTIESBURG, MS 51%1,110
1261Dennis Lyndell Pickett LOUISVILLE, KY 51%3,354
1262Tiesh I. Reaves JOHNSTOWN, PA 51%1,407
1263Gerald Resnick PROVIDENCE, RI 51%951
1264Brenton L. Rogozen SAN JOSE, CA 51%1,562
1265R. Dirk Selland CHARLOTTE, NC 51%2,983
1266Deanna L. Sokolski NHC CHICAGO, IL 51%2,508
1267Noceeba Southern TOLEDO OH, OH 51%4,148
1268Stephen M. Szymczak PROVIDENCE, RI 51%1,277
1269Jason P. Tepley COLUMBUS, OH 51%1,313
1270Jennifer B. Thomas NASHVILLE, TN 51%3,624
1271Charles J. Thorbjornsen VALPARAISO IN, IN 51%2,665
1272Regina L. Warren PHILADELPHIA, PA 51%2,730
1273Luke Woltering ELKINS PARK, PA 51%3,749
1274Brian Yamada MORENO VALLEY, CA 51%887
1275Marilyn D. Zahm BUFFALO, NY 51%129
1276William C. Zuber LOUISVILLE, KY 51%4,082
1277Theodore W. Annos CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 50%1,148
1278Paul D. Barker BALTIMORE, MD 50%812
1279John Benson LAWRENCE MA, MA 50%3,342
1280J. Leland Bentley MCALESTER 50%3,044
1281Joseph Booth III GREENSBORO, NC 50%3,303
1282Carol K. Bowen FORT WORTH, TX 50%3,722
1283Solomon Boyle HOUSTON WEST, TX 50%2,315
1284Marilyn R. Brand JACKSON MS OHO, MS 50%4,257
1285Cynthia M. Bretthauer EVANSTON, IL 50%1,852
1286Thomas D. Businger PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 50%2,340
1287James Carberry NORWALK, CA 50%3,900
1288Alison Crisman VALPARAISO IN, IN 50%1,284
1289Jerry Faust NHC ST LOUIS, MO 50%1,647
1290Victoria A. Ferrer ORLAND PARK, IL 50%2,667
1291Margaret M. Gabell ELKINS PARK, PA 50%3,713
1292Steven C. Graalmann ALEXANDRIA, LA 50%146
1293Donald M. Graffius JOHNSTOWN, PA 50%1,307
1294Jeffrey Hartranft COLUMBUS, OH 50%3,670
1295Laura S. Havens TUCSON, AZ 50%3,993
1296Jo Hoenninger PORTLAND OR, OR 50%2,973
1297Robyn L. Hoffman SYRACUSE, NY 50%2,115
1298William L. Hogan COVINGTON GA, GA 50%2,009
1299Lloyd Hubler CINCINNATI, OH 50%1,234
1300Thomas S. Inman DENVER, CO 50%1,294

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).