All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 10 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 901–1000 of 2044 judges
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
606
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,808
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,154
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
718
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
4,374
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
5,221
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
1,767
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,947
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
4,773
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
1,747
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,476
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
330
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
282
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
2,236
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
4,567
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
684
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,976
Office
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
614
Approval Rate
57%
Decisions
3,434
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
347
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,762
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
4,094
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,760
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,701
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
4,283
Office
WHITE PLAINS
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,035
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,105
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,884
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
4,309
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,680
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,504
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
753
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,135
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,901
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
281
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,986
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,465
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,704
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,574
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,828
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,629
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,345
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,101
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,429
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,497
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,061
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,953
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,009
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,983
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,200
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
979
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,250
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
196
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,488
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
189
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,837
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,980
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,592
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,692
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,659
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
571
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,774
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,614
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,305
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
948
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,795
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,768
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
4,086
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,826
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,281
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
2,944
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
429
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,937
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
4,761
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,951
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,897
Office
CREVE COEUR
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
1,678
Office
Approval Rate
56%
Decisions
3,363
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,310
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,992
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,424
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,062
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,796
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
4,405
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
4,605
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,211
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,680
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,375
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
2,813
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
543
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,366
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,054
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
466
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
731
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
950
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,815
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,264
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
1,011
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
3,590
Office
Approval Rate
55%
Decisions
194
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
901Michael A. Rodriguez TAMPA OHO, FL 57%606
902Rebecca B. Sartor DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 57%2,808
903Sherry L. Schallner OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 57%3,154
904Kimberly D. Schulz BRONX, NY 57%718
905Michael Scurry EVANSVILLE, IN 57%4,374
906Charles Shinn AKRON OH, OH 57%5,221
907Miriam L. Shire BRONX, NY 57%1,767
908Trevor Skarda STOCKTON, CA 57%3,947
909Donald G. Smith ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 57%4,773
910Timothy S. Snelling FRESNO, CA 57%1,747
911Wayne Stanley SEVEN FIELDS, PA 57%2,476
912Elizabeth M. Tafe MANCHESTER, NH 57%330
913Billy Thomas CINCINNATI, OH 57%282
914Marguerite Toland JERSEY CITY, NJ 57%2,236
915Marty S. Turner PADUCAH, KY 57%4,567
916Laura S. Twilley DAYTON, OH 57%684
917Katherine Weatherly EUGENE, OR 57%3,976
918Anna Wright BUFFALO, NY 57%614
919Barbara J. Zanotti TAMPA OHO, FL 57%3,434
920McArthur Allen ATLANTA NORTH, GA 56%347
921Michael N. Balter AKRON OH, OH 56%3,762
922Renita Barnett-Jefferson MONTGOMERY, AL 56%4,094
923James F. Barter MOBILE, AL 56%2,760
924William J. Bezego SEVEN FIELDS, PA 56%3,701
925Robert N. Burdette HOUSTON WEST, TX 56%4,283
926Vincent M. Cascio WHITE PLAINS 56%3,035
927Stanley K. Chin NHC BALTIMORE, MD 56%3,105
928Kerith Cohen NORFOLK, VA 56%1,884
929Todd S. Colarusso ATLANTA NORTH, GA 56%4,309
930Christine Cutter PORTLAND ME, ME 56%3,680
931Ricardy Damille NEWARK, NJ 56%3,504
932Rolesia Dancy MONTGOMERY, AL 56%753
933Stephanie Daniels Smoke ALEXANDRIA, LA 56%1,135
934Yvette N. Diamond NHC BALTIMORE, MD 56%2,901
935Joseph P. Donovan Sr. NHC CHICAGO, IL 56%281
936Rosanne M. Dummer NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 56%2,986
937Sarah Ehasz PITTSBURGH, PA 56%3,465
938Cynthia Floyd LONG BEACH, CA 56%3,704
939Martha M. Gasparovich LIVONIA MI, MI 56%2,574
940Lynn Ginsberg DENVER, CO 56%2,828
941Brandie Hall LOUISVILLE, KY 56%2,629
942Stephen M. Hanekamp ST LOUIS, MO 56%3,345
943Philip J. Healy CHARLESTON SC, SC 56%1,101
944Juliana P. Heaton KNOXVILLE, TN 56%2,429
945Mason Hogan RALEIGH, NC 56%3,497
946Dierdra Howard WASHINGTON, DC 56%1,061
947Carey Jobe CHATTANOOGA, TN 56%1,953
948William J. King Jr. NHC CHICAGO, IL 56%1,009
949Tresie Kinnell DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 56%3,983
950David L. Knowles LITTLE ROCK, AR 56%2,200
951Sarah Lough MINNEAPOLIS, MN 56%979
952Kristie Luffman-Minor CHATTANOOGA, TN 56%3,250
953Robert D. Marcinkowski ORLANDO, FL 56%196
954David G. Marcus LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CA 56%2,488
955Andrea McBarnette BALTIMORE, MD 56%189
956Carla McMichael ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 56%2,837
957Daniel Myers SACRAMENTO, CA 56%2,980
958Lawrence J. Neary HARRISBURG, PA 56%2,592
959Manh H. Nguyen MT PLEASANT MI, MI 56%3,692
960Wynne O'Brien-Persons RENO, NV 56%2,659
961Sasha Paternoster PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZ 56%571
962R. J. Payne SPOKANE, WA 56%1,774
963Gloria Pellegrino SAN FRANCISCO, CA 56%2,614
964Lissette C. Perez SAN ANTONIO, TX 56%2,305
965Stephen Pope EVANSTON, IL 56%948
966Jeffrey Raeber MT PLEASANT MI, MI 56%2,795
967Jack W. Raines FORT WORTH, TX 56%1,768
968Edgardo Rodriguez-Quilichini ORLANDO, FL 56%4,086
969William T. Ross BOSTON, MA 56%2,826
970Julie Sammer MILWAUKEE, WI 56%1,281
971Scot Septer FRESNO, CA 56%2,944
972James W. Sherry TACOMA, WA 56%429
973Ralph F. Shilling DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 56%3,937
974D'Lisa Simmons HOUSTON NORTH, TX 56%4,761
975Michele Stolls WILKES BARRE, PA 56%3,951
976Melissa Warner TACOMA, WA 56%1,897
977Karen Winn CREVE COEUR 56%1,678
978Elias Xenos DETROIT, MI 56%3,363
979Ryan A. Alger HARTFORD, CT 55%3,310
980Sharon Allard NEWARK, NJ 55%2,992
981Stephan Bell BUFFALO, NY 55%3,424
982Patrick Berigan MILWAUKEE, WI 55%2,062
983Peter J. Boylan CINCINNATI, OH 55%2,796
984Joseph L. Brinkley RALEIGH, NC 55%4,405
985Janice M. Bruning OAK BROOK, IL 55%4,605
986Robert J. Burbank TOPEKA KS, KS 55%1,211
987Tierney Carlos BALTIMORE, MD 55%1,680
988Regina Carpenter MORGANTOWN, WV 55%3,375
989Gracian A. Celaya MIAMI OHO, FL 55%2,813
990Karen A. Cornick-Craig ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 55%543
991Brian Crockett MORGANTOWN, WV 55%3,366
992Brian Curley LAWRENCE MA, MA 55%1,054
993Roosevelt Currie NHC ST LOUIS, MO 55%466
994Patricia Daum SEVEN FIELDS, PA 55%731
995Lyn Farmer PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 55%950
996Bruce S. Fein SYRACUSE, NY 55%3,815
997David Foley DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 55%1,264
998Kimberly M. Gallegos LONG BEACH, CA 55%1,011
999Chad Gendreau NORFOLK, VA 55%3,590
1000Edmund E. Giorgione COLUMBUS, OH 55%194

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).