All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 7 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 601–700 of 2044 judges
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
552
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,252
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,128
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,910
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
546
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,196
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,381
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,297
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,534
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,531
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,056
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
191
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,166
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
4,859
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,029
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
4,490
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
930
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,077
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,799
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
303
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,677
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,415
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
4,421
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,555
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,916
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,941
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,029
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
322
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
886
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,495
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
4,273
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,692
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,473
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,232
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,578
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,495
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
897
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,271
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,420
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,543
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
376
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,682
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
470
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
689
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,066
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
4,237
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,541
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,941
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,347
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
3,299
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,044
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
1,315
Office
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
846
Approval Rate
62%
Decisions
2,883
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,601
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
1,763
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
1,308
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,718
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
962
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,885
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,032
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,837
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
1,739
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,280
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,061
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,921
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,194
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,055
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,535
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,639
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,826
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,076
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,650
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
1,885
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
866
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
234
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,938
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,778
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,377
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,202
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,400
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,825
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
4,487
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,392
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,134
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
994
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,006
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,886
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
1,349
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
948
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,068
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,369
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,021
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
3,563
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
1,761
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,338
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
1,718
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
743
Office
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
4,383
Approval Rate
61%
Decisions
2,137
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
601Carolyn Cohn-Morros ORANGE, CA 62%552
602Daniel Dadabo EVANSTON, IL 62%1,252
603Grant Dail ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 62%1,128
604John R. Daughtry FRANKLIN TN, TN 62%3,910
605Lamar W. Davis PORTLAND ME, ME 62%546
606John Dodson LIVONIA MI, MI 62%2,196
607Donna M. Edwards BALTIMORE, MD 62%2,381
608George L. Evans III KINGSPORT, TN 62%1,297
609Rita E. Foley ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 62%2,534
610Darrell Fun CHARLOTTE, NC 62%1,531
611Raina Goods PHILADELPHIA, PA 62%1,056
612James B. Griffith NHC ST LOUIS, MO 62%191
613Tracy S. Guice MOBILE, AL 62%3,166
614Hortensia Haaversen WASHINGTON, DC 62%4,859
615Mason D. Harrell Jr. SAN BERNARDINO, CA 62%3,029
616Thaddeus J. Hess GREENVILLE, SC 62%4,490
617Gregory Holiday OAK PARK, MI 62%930
618Derek Johnson PORTLAND OR, OR 62%3,077
619Christopher H. Juge NEW ORLEANS, LA 62%3,799
620Richard J. Kallsnick TULSA, OK 62%303
621James J. Kent LANSING, MI 62%3,677
622Patrick Kilgannon LONG ISLAND, NY 62%3,415
623Jana Kinkade DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 62%4,421
624Wesley R. Kliner CHATTANOOGA, TN 62%3,555
625Monica LaPolt INDIANAPOLIS, IN 62%3,916
626Donna Lefebvre KNOXVILLE, TN 62%3,941
627James W. Lessis DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 62%3,029
628Michael L. Levinson MACON, GA 62%322
629John H. Maclean SAVANNAH, GA 62%886
630Patrick J. MacLean LIVONIA MI, MI 62%2,495
631Janet Mahon ORLANDO, FL 62%4,273
632Maria T. Mandry ORLANDO, FL 62%3,692
633Cindy Martin TULSA OHO, OK 62%3,473
634Paul G. Martin MANCHESTER, NH 62%2,232
635David A. Mason Jr. LIVONIA MI, MI 62%2,578
636Glenn A. Neel FORT SMITH, AR 62%3,495
637Ted W. Neiswanger EUGENE, OR 62%897
638Brian A. Oakes MONTGOMERY, AL 62%1,271
639Julio Ocampo ORLANDO, FL 62%2,420
640Richard A. Opp BILLINGS, MT 62%1,543
641Edgar J. Perkerson COVINGTON GA, GA 62%376
642Gerardo R. Pico COLUMBIA MO, MO 62%2,682
643Barry E. Ryan SYRACUSE, NY 62%470
644Richard L. Sasena LIVONIA MI, MI 62%689
645Kimberly L. Schiro BRONX, NY 62%2,066
646Gregory Smith ORLAND PARK, IL 62%4,237
647Alfred M. Smith Jr. NASHVILLE, TN 62%1,541
648Valorie Stefanelli QUEENS, NY 62%2,941
649Melissa Tenenbaum SEVEN FIELDS, PA 62%2,347
650Howard K. Treblin SAN DIEGO, CA 62%3,299
651Peter J. Valentino SAN DIEGO, CA 62%1,044
652Ryan Vanda PROVIDENCE, RI 62%1,315
653Angel X. Viera SAN JUAN, PR 62%846
654Howard Wishnoff PHILADELPHIA EAST, PA 62%2,883
655Enrico Alis OAKLAND, CA 61%3,601
656Douglass Alvarado NEWARK, NJ 61%1,763
657Ben Ballengee ALBUQUERQUE, NM 61%1,308
658Robert Ballieu TAMPA OHO, FL 61%2,718
659Jasper J. Bede ELKINS PARK, PA 61%962
660Laurie A. Bedell ATLANTA NORTH, GA 61%3,885
661Laura Bernasconi PROVIDENCE, RI 61%3,032
662NaKeisha Blount WASHINGTON, DC 61%2,837
663Steven L. Carnes TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FL 61%1,739
664Constance D. Carter SAVANNAH, GA 61%2,280
665Robert J. Chavez LIVONIA MI, MI 61%3,061
666James Conlon ATLANTA NORTH, GA 61%2,921
667Margaret Craig TAMPA OHO, FL 61%3,194
668B. D. Crutchfield TULSA OHO, OK 61%3,055
669Jeremy G. Eldred SYRACUSE, NY 61%3,535
670Joel G. Fina OAK BROOK, IL 61%3,639
671Ronald Fleming COLUMBIA SC, SC 61%2,826
672Kenton W. Fulton OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 61%3,076
673Frank L. Gregori NASHVILLE, TN 61%2,650
674T. Patrick Hannon SAN JOSE, CA 61%1,885
675John Heyer SAN FRANCISCO, CA 61%866
676Patrick B. Kimberlin III LOUISVILLE, KY 61%234
677Marti Kirby MORENO VALLEY, CA 61%2,938
678Kendra S. Kleber LEXINGTON, KY 61%2,778
679Judith A. Kopec STOCKTON, CA 61%2,377
680Robert Lenzini ORANGE, CA 61%3,202
681Lawrence Levey NHC BALTIMORE, MD 61%2,400
682Jason A. Lewis FLORENCE, AL 61%2,825
683Luke Liter TULSA OHO, OK 61%4,487
684James M. Martin GREENVILLE, SC 61%3,392
685Shirley A. Marzan TAMPA OHO, FL 61%3,134
686Dana E. McDonald COVINGTON GA, GA 61%994
687Ruxana Meyer HONOLULU, HI 61%3,006
688Hilton R. Miller ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 61%3,886
689Beverly S. Parkhurst NHC CHICAGO, IL 61%1,349
690William R. Paxton CHARLESTON WV, WV 61%948
691Gina Pesaresi JERSEY CITY, NJ 61%2,068
692Tara J. Posner BALTIMORE, MD 61%2,369
693MaryKay Rauenzahn EUGENE, OR 61%3,021
694Michael Schaefer MADISON, WI 61%3,563
695Yvonne K. Stam RALEIGH, NC 61%1,761
696Dory Sutker MANCHESTER, NH 61%2,338
697Joseph Vallowe CLEVELAND, OH 61%1,718
698Frederick R. Waitsman ATLANTA NORTH, GA 61%743
699Douglas A. Walker ORLANDO, FL 61%4,383
700Nicholas Walter GREENVILLE, SC 61%2,137

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).