Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 601 | Michael A. Cabotaje | SAN RAFAEL, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 2,428 | |
| 602 | Michael Calabro | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Sep 2019 | 62% | 1,164 | |
| 603 | Laura Chess | MT PLEASANT MI, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 4,531 | |
| 604 | Carolyn Cohn-Morros | ORANGE, CALast decision Sep 2019 | 62% | 552 | |
| 605 | Daniel Dadabo | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Sep 2019 | 62% | 1,252 | |
| 606 | Grant Dail | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 1,128 | |
| 607 | John R. Daughtry | FRANKLIN TN, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 3,910 | |
| 608 | Lamar W. Davis | PORTLAND ME, MELast decision Sep 2017 | 62% | 546 | |
| 609 | John Dodson | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Sep 2021 | 62% | 2,196 | |
| 610 | Donna M. Edwards | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2023 | 62% | 2,381 | |
| 611 | George L. Evans III | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Sep 2025 | 62% | 1,297 | |
| 612 | Rita E. Foley | ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FLLast decision Sep 2024 | 62% | 2,534 | |
| 613 | Darrell Fun | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Sep 2022 | 62% | 1,531 | |
| 614 | Raina Goods | PHILADELPHIA, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 1,056 | |
| 615 | James B. Griffith | NHC ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Sep 2018 | 62% | 191 | |
| 616 | Tracy S. Guice | MOBILE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 3,166 | |
| 617 | Hortensia Haaversen | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 4,859 | |
| 618 | Mason D. Harrell Jr. | SAN BERNARDINO, CALast decision Sep 2024 | 62% | 3,029 | |
| 619 | Thaddeus J. Hess | GREENVILLE, SCLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 4,490 | |
| 620 | Gregory Holiday | OAK PARK, MILast decision Sep 2018 | 62% | 930 | |
| 621 | Derek Johnson | PORTLAND OR, ORLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 3,077 | |
| 622 | Christopher H. Juge | NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 3,799 | |
| 623 | Richard J. Kallsnick | TULSA, OKLast decision Sep 2016 | 62% | 303 | |
| 624 | James J. Kent | LANSING, MILast decision Sep 2024 | 62% | 3,677 | |
| 625 | Patrick Kilgannon | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 3,415 | |
| 626 | Jana Kinkade | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 4,421 | |
| 627 | Wesley R. Kliner | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 3,555 | |
| 628 | Monica LaPolt | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 3,916 | |
| 629 | Donna Lefebvre | KNOXVILLE, TNLast decision Sep 2024 | 62% | 3,941 | |
| 630 | James W. Lessis | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Sep 2022 | 62% | 3,029 | |
| 631 | Michael L. Levinson | MACON, GALast decision Sep 2017 | 62% | 322 | |
| 632 | John H. Maclean | SAVANNAH, GALast decision Sep 2018 | 62% | 886 | |
| 633 | Patrick J. MacLean | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Sep 2022 | 62% | 2,495 | |
| 634 | Janet Mahon | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 4,273 | |
| 635 | Maria T. Mandry | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Sep 2025 | 62% | 3,692 | |
| 636 | Cindy Martin | TULSA OHO, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 3,473 | |
| 637 | Paul G. Martin | MANCHESTER, NHLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 2,232 | |
| 638 | David A. Mason Jr. | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Sep 2025 | 62% | 2,578 | |
| 639 | Glenn A. Neel | FORT SMITH, ARLast decision Sep 2025 | 62% | 3,495 | |
| 640 | Ted W. Neiswanger | EUGENE, ORLast decision Sep 2018 | 62% | 897 | |
| 641 | Brian A. Oakes | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 1,271 | |
| 642 | Julio Ocampo | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Sep 2025 | 62% | 2,420 | |
| 643 | Richard A. Opp | BILLINGS, MTLast decision Sep 2020 | 62% | 1,543 | |
| 644 | Edgar J. Perkerson | COVINGTON GA, GALast decision Sep 2017 | 62% | 376 | |
| 645 | Gerardo R. Pico | COLUMBIA MO, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 2,682 | |
| 646 | Claudia Rosen-Underwood | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Sep 2020 | 62% | 767 | |
| 647 | Barry E. Ryan | SYRACUSE, NYLast decision Sep 2017 | 62% | 470 | |
| 648 | Richard L. Sasena | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Sep 2017 | 62% | 689 | |
| 649 | Kimberly L. Schiro | BRONX, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 2,066 | |
| 650 | Gregory Smith | ORLAND PARK, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 4,237 | |
| 651 | Alfred M. Smith Jr. | NASHVILLE, TNLast decision Sep 2019 | 62% | 1,541 | |
| 652 | Valorie Stefanelli | QUEENS, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 2,941 | |
| 653 | Melissa Tenenbaum | SEVEN FIELDS, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 2,347 | |
| 654 | Howard K. Treblin | SAN DIEGO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 3,299 | |
| 655 | Peter J. Valentino | SAN DIEGO, CALast decision Sep 2021 | 62% | 1,044 | |
| 656 | Ryan Vanda | PROVIDENCE, RILast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 1,315 | |
| 657 | Angel X. Viera | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Jan 2020 | 62% | 846 | |
| 658 | Howard Wishnoff | PHILADELPHIA EAST, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 62% | 2,883 | |
| 659 | Enrico Alis | OAKLAND, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,601 | |
| 660 | Douglass Alvarado | NEWARK, NJLast decision Sep 2020 | 61% | 1,763 | |
| 661 | Ben Ballengee | ALBUQUERQUE, NMLast decision Sep 2019 | 61% | 1,308 | |
| 662 | Robert Ballieu | TAMPA OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 2,718 | |
| 663 | Jasper J. Bede | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Sep 2019 | 61% | 962 | |
| 664 | Laurie A. Bedell | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,885 | |
| 665 | Laura Bernasconi | PROVIDENCE, RILast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,032 | |
| 666 | NaKeisha Blount | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 2,837 | |
| 667 | Steven L. Carnes | TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FLLast decision Sep 2023 | 61% | 1,739 | |
| 668 | Constance D. Carter | SAVANNAH, GALast decision Sep 2022 | 61% | 2,280 | |
| 669 | Robert J. Chavez | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,061 | |
| 670 | James Conlon | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 2,921 | |
| 671 | Margaret Craig | TAMPA OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,194 | |
| 672 | B. D. Crutchfield | TULSA OHO, OKLast decision Sep 2021 | 61% | 3,055 | |
| 673 | Jeremy G. Eldred | SYRACUSE, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,535 | |
| 674 | Joel G. Fina | OAK BROOK, ILLast decision Sep 2025 | 61% | 3,639 | |
| 675 | Ronald Fleming | COLUMBIA SC, SCLast decision Sep 2025 | 61% | 2,826 | |
| 676 | Kenton W. Fulton | OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,076 | |
| 677 | Frank L. Gregori | NASHVILLE, TNLast decision Sep 2024 | 61% | 2,650 | |
| 678 | T. Patrick Hannon | SAN JOSE, CALast decision Sep 2021 | 61% | 1,885 | |
| 679 | John Heyer | SAN FRANCISCO, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 61% | 866 | |
| 680 | Patrick B. Kimberlin III | LOUISVILLE, KYLast decision Sep 2016 | 61% | 234 | |
| 681 | Marti Kirby | MORENO VALLEY, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 2,938 | |
| 682 | Kendra S. Kleber | LEXINGTON, KYLast decision Sep 2025 | 61% | 2,778 | |
| 683 | Judith A. Kopec | STOCKTON, CALast decision Sep 2022 | 61% | 2,377 | |
| 684 | Robert Lenzini | ORANGE, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,202 | |
| 685 | Lawrence Levey | NHC BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2025 | 61% | 2,400 | |
| 686 | Jason A. Lewis | FLORENCE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 2,825 | |
| 687 | Luke Liter | TULSA OHO, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 4,487 | |
| 688 | James M. Martin | GREENVILLE, SCLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,392 | |
| 689 | Shirley A. Marzan | TAMPA OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,134 | |
| 690 | Dana E. McDonald | COVINGTON GA, GALast decision Sep 2019 | 61% | 994 | |
| 691 | Ruxana Meyer | HONOLULU, HILast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,006 | |
| 692 | Hilton R. Miller | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,886 | |
| 693 | Beverly S. Parkhurst | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Sep 2020 | 61% | 1,349 | |
| 694 | William R. Paxton | CHARLESTON WV, WVLast decision Sep 2019 | 61% | 948 | |
| 695 | Gina Pesaresi | JERSEY CITY, NJLast decision Apr 2024 | 61% | 2,068 | |
| 696 | Tara J. Posner | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 2,369 | |
| 697 | MaryKay Rauenzahn | NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NMLast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,021 | |
| 698 | Michael Schaefer | MADISON, WILast decision Jul 2026 | 61% | 3,563 | |
| 699 | Yvonne K. Stam | RALEIGH, NCLast decision Sep 2020 | 61% | 1,761 | |
| 700 | Dory Sutker | MANCHESTER, NHLast decision Sep 2024 | 61% | 2,338 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.