All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 14 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1301–1400 of 2044 judges
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,510
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,203
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
293
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,423
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,333
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
4,071
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,853
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,380
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,825
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,975
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,085
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,722
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,896
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
738
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,280
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
835
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,408
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,914
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,633
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,780
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,576
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,164
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
4,035
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,864
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,787
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,635
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
1,721
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,993
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
514
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,154
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
3,383
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
2,852
Office
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
317
Approval Rate
50%
Decisions
4,547
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,493
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
4,991
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
829
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,425
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,749
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
880
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,724
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,298
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,629
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,051
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,935
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,524
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
4,189
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
4,029
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,306
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,537
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,250
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
4,009
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
5,423
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,760
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
4,179
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,857
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
4,294
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,579
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
4,072
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,324
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,952
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,472
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
268
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
665
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
973
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,881
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,769
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,577
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,214
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,074
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,557
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,271
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,512
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,468
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,807
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
887
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,340
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,371
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,091
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,868
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,156
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,596
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,758
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,989
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,349
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,405
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,257
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
959
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,028
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
1,915
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,971
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,996
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
150
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,981
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,728
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
2,711
Office
Approval Rate
49%
Decisions
3,097
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
3,579
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
549
Approval Rate
48%
Decisions
453
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1301Meredith L. Jacques TOLEDO OH, OH 50%1,510
1302Anthony J. Johnson Jr. RICHMOND, VA 50%3,203
1303Wylly Jordan COVINGTON GA, GA 50%293
1304Theodore P. Kennedy RICHMOND, VA 50%2,423
1305Raghav Kotval WASHINGTON, DC 50%3,333
1306Gerard W. Langan WILKES BARRE, PA 50%4,071
1307Brian LeCours ALBANY, NY 50%3,853
1308Nancy Lisewski SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 50%2,380
1309Robert Long VALPARAISO IN, IN 50%1,825
1310Jane M. Maccione STOCKTON, CA 50%1,975
1311Kieran McCormack NEW YORK, NY 50%3,085
1312Candace A. McDaniel LOUISVILLE, KY 50%3,722
1313John P. Mills III DES MOINES, IA 50%2,896
1314Camille Monahan MEMPHIS, TN 50%738
1315Neil Morholt LAS VEGAS, NV 50%3,280
1316LaSandra Morrison TOPEKA KS, KS 50%835
1317Jude B. Mulvey ALBANY, NY 50%1,408
1318Guila Parker MADISON, WI 50%2,914
1319Denise Pasvantis FT LAUDERDALE, FL 50%3,633
1320John A. Peebles MEMPHIS, TN 50%3,780
1321David Read LANSING, MI 50%3,576
1322Antony Saragas LEXINGTON, KY 50%3,164
1323Scott C. Shimer FRANKLIN TN, TN 50%4,035
1324Jesse K. Shumway SPOKANE, WA 50%3,864
1325Jennifer Spector ELKINS PARK, PA 50%3,787
1326Edward F. Sweeney HARTFORD, CT 50%3,635
1327Susan L. Torres HARRISBURG, PA 50%1,721
1328Joshua L. Vineyard COLUMBIA SC, SC 50%2,993
1329Richard L. Vogel CHARLESTON SC, SC 50%514
1330David Willis MEMPHIS, TN 50%3,154
1331Timothy Wing WILKES BARRE, PA 50%3,383
1332Kellie Wingate Campbell COLUMBIA MO, MO 50%2,852
1333Russell B. Wolff BILLINGS, MT 50%317
1334David R. Wurm SAN ANTONIO, TX 50%4,547
1335Chandreka Allen ST LOUIS, MO 49%2,493
1336Matthew Allen SAN ANTONIO, TX 49%4,991
1337Keith Allred SEATTLE, WA 49%829
1338Eric Anschuetz LOUISVILLE, KY 49%2,425
1339Edward Bowling KNOXVILLE, TN 49%1,749
1340Anne W. Chain ELKINS PARK, PA 49%880
1341John Dawkins TAMPA OHO, FL 49%3,724
1342Kelley Day NEW ORLEANS, LA 49%2,298
1343Michael R. Dayton WICHITA, KS 49%1,629
1344Daniel J. Driscoll BOSTON, MA 49%2,051
1345Mary L. Everstine SANTA BARBARA, CA 49%1,935
1346Jeffrey A. Ferguson SAVANNAH, GA 49%2,524
1347Nicolas R. Foster RICHMOND, VA 49%4,189
1348Perry L. Franklin SPRINGFIELD MO, MO 49%4,029
1349Michael Friedman QUEENS, NY 49%1,306
1350Stephen Gontis ALBUQUERQUE, NM 49%1,537
1351Lisa R. Hall PADUCAH, KY 49%3,250
1352David J. Hebert HOUSTON NORTH, TX 49%4,009
1353Maria Hodges HUNTINGTON WV, WV 49%5,423
1354Jessica Hodgson CINCINNATI, OH 49%2,760
1355Todd S. Holbrook PORTLAND ME, ME 49%4,179
1356Wendy Hollingsworth HATTIESBURG, MS 49%2,857
1357Greg Holsclaw LEXINGTON, KY 49%4,294
1358Sharilyn Hopson ORANGE, CA 49%2,579
1359Stuart T. Janney EVANSVILLE, IN 49%4,072
1360Marcus Johns EVANSVILLE, IN 49%1,324
1361David Johnson TACOMA, WA 49%3,952
1362Matthew Johnson ORLAND PARK, IL 49%1,472
1363Owen B. Katzman PHILADELPHIA, PA 49%268
1364Michael S. Kidd DENVER, CO 49%665
1365Amanda Knapp AKRON OH, OH 49%973
1366Karen B. Kostol MORGANTOWN, WV 49%2,881
1367Teresa A. Kroenecke INDIANAPOLIS, IN 49%3,769
1368Jeffrey P. La Vicka MORGANTOWN, WV 49%3,577
1369Michael L. Larner DES MOINES, IA 49%3,214
1370Michele Lazzaro PHILADELPHIA EAST, PA 49%1,074
1371Jonathan H. Leiner MIDDLESBORO, KY 49%1,557
1372Jeannine Lesperance COLUMBUS, OH 49%3,271
1373Marc Mates OMAHA, NE 49%1,512
1374Carol Matula NORFOLK, VA 49%3,468
1375Christine McCafferty PHILADELPHIA, PA 49%2,807
1376Jacquelyn A. McClinton DETROIT, MI 49%887
1377Shane McGovern DENVER, CO 49%3,340
1378Joshua Menard MANCHESTER, NH 49%3,371
1379Susannah Merritt PHILADELPHIA EAST, PA 49%2,091
1380Kevin W. Messer SAN DIEGO, CA 49%2,868
1381Trina Moore JERSEY CITY, NJ 49%3,156
1382Elizabeth P. Neuhoff FRANKLIN TN, TN 49%3,596
1383Lyle Olson FARGO, ND 49%1,758
1384Matthias D. Onderak EVANSVILLE, IN 49%2,989
1385Mary C. Peltzer CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 49%1,349
1386Irving A. Pianin NORFOLK, VA 49%1,405
1387Lornette Reynolds MIAMI OHO, FL 49%3,257
1388Willie L. Rose JACKSON, MS 49%959
1389Melissa M. Santiago CHICAGO, IL 49%1,028
1390Joseph D. Schloss MORENO VALLEY, CA 49%1,915
1391Susan G. Smith NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 49%2,971
1392Todd Spangler KNOXVILLE, TN 49%2,996
1393Channing Strother PHILADELPHIA EAST, PA 49%150
1394Kevin Walker INDIANAPOLIS, IN 49%3,981
1395Thomas L. Wang COLUMBUS, OH 49%2,728
1396Shreese M. Wilson PEORIA, IL 49%2,711
1397Stacy Zimmerman ORANGE, CA 49%3,097
1398Genevieve Adamo CLEVELAND, OH 48%3,579
1399Karl Alexander MORGANTOWN, WV 48%549
1400Gwen Anderson NHC ST LOUIS, MO 48%453

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).