Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 301 | Jessica H. Pugrud | BILLINGS, MTLast decision Sep 2018 | 70% | 332 | |
| 302 | Marc Seidman | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Sep 2019 | 70% | 1,091 | |
| 303 | Steven D. Slahta | FORT MYERS FL, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,529 | |
| 304 | Thomas W. Springer | MADISON, WILast decision Sep 2018 | 70% | 1,023 | |
| 305 | Tammy A. Thames | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,845 | |
| 306 | Frederick Timm | SOUTH JERSEY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 4,288 | |
| 307 | Zachary S. Weiss | BRONX, NYLast decision Sep 2021 | 70% | 1,496 | |
| 308 | Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian | OAK PARK, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 3,696 | |
| 309 | Charles J. Arnold | FORT MYERS FL, FLLast decision Sep 2022 | 69% | 2,548 | |
| 310 | Eric W. Borda | PHILADELPHIA, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 3,661 | |
| 311 | Michael L. Brownfield | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Sep 2025 | 69% | 2,052 | |
| 312 | Paul S. Carter | SAVANNAH, GALast decision Sep 2021 | 69% | 2,152 | |
| 313 | Timothy J. Christensen | OAK PARK, MILast decision Sep 2025 | 69% | 3,487 | |
| 314 | Steven L. Cravens | OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 3,396 | |
| 315 | Charles Davis | TUCSON, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 3,994 | |
| 316 | L. Ellis Davis | COVINGTON GA, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 3,764 | |
| 317 | Tanya Dvarishkis | BILLINGS, MTLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 3,817 | |
| 318 | Mary M. French | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Sep 2019 | 69% | 1,101 | |
| 319 | James N. Gramenos | DETROIT, MILast decision Sep 2016 | 69% | 203 | |
| 320 | Evangelina P. Hernandez | OAKLAND, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 2,756 | |
| 321 | Gal Lahat | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 2,865 | |
| 322 | Meryl L. Lissek | NEWARK, NJLast decision Sep 2022 | 69% | 2,268 | |
| 323 | Sheila Lowther | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2025 | 69% | 852 | |
| 324 | Jon C. Lyons | PHILADELPHIA, PALast decision Sep 2021 | 69% | 1,865 | |
| 325 | Michelle S. Marcus | ALBANY, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 1,903 | |
| 326 | Sylke Merchan | OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 2,937 | |
| 327 | Barry A. Miller | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Sep 2019 | 69% | 853 | |
| 328 | Donna M. Montano | PASADENA, CALast decision Sep 2020 | 69% | 1,543 | |
| 329 | Thomas M. Muth II | MOBILE, ALLast decision Sep 2025 | 69% | 2,793 | |
| 330 | Donald K. Neely | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 2,936 | |
| 331 | Maria C. Northington | FORT MYERS FL, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 4,268 | |
| 332 | Michael Pendola | ORLAND PARK, ILLast decision Sep 2025 | 69% | 2,853 | |
| 333 | Kathleen Scully-Hayes | ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 2,020 | |
| 334 | Ricky V. South | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 4,386 | |
| 335 | Heidi Southern | DAYTON, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 3,176 | |
| 336 | Mary Sparks | ALBANY, NYLast decision Sep 2022 | 69% | 1,863 | |
| 337 | Douglas S. Stults | OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 4,172 | |
| 338 | David Tobias | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 69% | 3,717 | |
| 339 | Peggy M. Zirlin | LONG BEACH, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 69% | 503 | |
| 340 | Christopher Ambrose | LANSING, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 3,854 | |
| 341 | Robert Baker Jr. | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2025 | 68% | 3,185 | |
| 342 | Kevin R. Barnes | DAYTON, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 4,261 | |
| 343 | William G. Brown | MINNEAPOLIS, MNLast decision Sep 2019 | 68% | 1,816 | |
| 344 | J. Elaine Burke | KNOXVILLE, TNLast decision Sep 2025 | 68% | 2,278 | |
| 345 | Jay L. Cohen | QUEENS, NYLast decision Sep 2020 | 68% | 1,256 | |
| 346 | Denise A. Copeland | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2021 | 68% | 1,884 | |
| 347 | William P. Diggs | CHARLESTON SC, SCLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 3,604 | |
| 348 | Ramona L. Fernandez | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Sep 2025 | 68% | 3,248 | |
| 349 | Irma J. Flottman | COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Sep 2025 | 68% | 3,484 | |
| 350 | Peter F. Gazda | SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 4,009 | |
| 351 | John F. Gehring | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Sep 2019 | 68% | 1,270 | |
| 352 | Robert Gonzalez | JERSEY CITY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 4,253 | |
| 353 | Henry Hamilton | DES MOINES, IALast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 3,677 | |
| 354 | Lisa Hibner Olson | SOUTH JERSEY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 1,983 | |
| 355 | Joseph M. Hillegas | PHILADELPHIA, PALast decision Sep 2016 | 68% | 469 | |
| 356 | Tiffani T. Jake | VALPARAISO IN, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 1,154 | |
| 357 | Donald R. Jensen | SALT LAKE CITY, UTLast decision Sep 2016 | 68% | 101 | |
| 358 | Donna A. Krappa | NEWARK, NJLast decision Sep 2023 | 68% | 2,626 | |
| 359 | Kelly B. Lind | ORANGE, CALast decision Sep 2019 | 68% | 261 | |
| 360 | Vanessa Lucas | FAYETTEVILLE NC, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 4,000 | |
| 361 | Ghermann Magana | PASADENA, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 1,344 | |
| 362 | Daniel J. Mages | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 4,621 | |
| 363 | Timothy Mangrum | SEATTLE, WALast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 3,348 | |
| 364 | William M. Manico | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 3,149 | |
| 365 | Christopher Messina | ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 2,377 | |
| 366 | Terry Miller | FORT WAYNE, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 4,186 | |
| 367 | Vivian W. Mittleman | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2016 | 68% | 154 | |
| 368 | William K. Mueller | SAN DIEGO, CALast decision Sep 2024 | 68% | 2,914 | |
| 369 | David R. Murchison | MOBILE, ALLast decision Sep 2025 | 68% | 3,130 | |
| 370 | Melvin G. Olmscheid | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 3,537 | |
| 371 | Keith C. Pilkey | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 5,181 | |
| 372 | Adrienne Porter | FAYETTEVILLE NC, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 3,970 | |
| 373 | Linda Gail Roberts-Reap | FRANKLIN TN, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 2,747 | |
| 374 | John E. Sandbothe | DES MOINES, IALast decision Sep 2025 | 68% | 2,811 | |
| 375 | Leisha Self | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2024 | 68% | 1,831 | |
| 376 | Philip J. Simon | PASADENA, CALast decision Sep 2021 | 68% | 1,581 | |
| 377 | Verley J. Spivey | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2018 | 68% | 877 | |
| 378 | Jonathan Sprague | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 3,542 | |
| 379 | Nancy M. Stewart | FRESNO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 3,072 | |
| 380 | Nathaniel E. Strickler | PEORIA, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 1,376 | |
| 381 | Peter V. Train | HARRISBURG, PALast decision Sep 2018 | 68% | 1,142 | |
| 382 | Lesley Troope | PASADENA, CALast decision Sep 2022 | 68% | 1,817 | |
| 383 | Timothy Turner | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 2,030 | |
| 384 | Andrew S. Weiss | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 68% | 3,540 | |
| 385 | J. Doug Wolfe | SALT LAKE CITY, UTLast decision Sep 2025 | 68% | 3,760 | |
| 386 | Paula Wordsworth | RALEIGH, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 3,953 | |
| 387 | Marc A. Yerkey | LONG BEACH, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 68% | 1,034 | |
| 388 | Michael D. Anderson | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Sep 2021 | 67% | 2,101 | |
| 389 | Renee S. Andrews-Turner | NASHVILLE, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,921 | |
| 390 | Laura Bach | HOUSTON WEST, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,787 | |
| 391 | Kristi Bellamy | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Sep 2020 | 67% | 956 | |
| 392 | Alan B. Berkowitz | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,992 | |
| 393 | Frederick W. Christian | COLUMBIA SC, SCLast decision Sep 2024 | 67% | 1,959 | |
| 394 | Michael F. Colligan | PITTSBURGH, PALast decision Sep 2017 | 67% | 323 | |
| 395 | Arthur L. Conover | COLUMBIA SC, SCLast decision Sep 2022 | 67% | 2,650 | |
| 396 | Alaina Davis | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 934 | |
| 397 | Kari Deming | OAK PARK, MILast decision Sep 2025 | 67% | 3,045 | |
| 398 | Andrew Dixon III | TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,536 | |
| 399 | Margaret A. Donaghy | QUEENS, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 67% | 1,489 | |
| 400 | Tom Duann | NORWALK, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 4,331 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.