All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 4 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 301–400 of 2044 judges
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
332
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
1,091
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,529
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
1,023
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,845
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
4,288
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
1,496
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
3,696
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,548
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
3,661
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,052
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,152
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
3,487
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
3,396
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
3,994
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
3,764
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
3,817
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
1,101
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
203
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,756
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,865
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,268
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
852
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
1,865
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
1,903
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,937
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
853
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
1,543
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,793
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,936
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
4,268
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,853
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
2,020
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
4,386
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
3,176
Office
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
1,863
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
4,172
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
3,717
Approval Rate
69%
Decisions
503
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,854
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,185
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
4,261
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,816
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
2,278
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,256
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,884
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,604
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,248
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,484
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
4,009
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,270
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
4,253
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,677
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,983
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
469
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,154
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
101
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
2,626
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
261
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
4,000
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,344
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
4,621
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,348
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,149
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
2,377
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
4,186
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
154
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
2,914
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,130
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,537
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
5,181
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,970
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
2,747
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
2,811
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,831
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,581
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
877
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,542
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,072
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,376
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,142
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,817
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
2,030
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,540
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,760
Office
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
3,953
Approval Rate
68%
Decisions
1,034
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
2,101
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,921
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,787
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
956
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,992
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,959
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
323
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
2,650
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
934
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,045
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,536
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,489
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
4,331
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
301Jessica H. Pugrud BILLINGS, MT 70%332
302Marc Seidman GREENSBORO, NC 70%1,091
303Steven D. Slahta FORT MYERS FL, FL 70%3,529
304Thomas W. Springer MADISON, WI 70%1,023
305Tammy A. Thames DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 70%3,845
306Frederick Timm SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 70%4,288
307Zachary S. Weiss BRONX, NY 70%1,496
308Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian OAK PARK, MI 69%3,696
309Charles J. Arnold FORT MYERS FL, FL 69%2,548
310Eric W. Borda PHILADELPHIA, PA 69%3,661
311Michael L. Brownfield CHATTANOOGA, TN 69%2,052
312Paul S. Carter SAVANNAH, GA 69%2,152
313Timothy J. Christensen OAK PARK, MI 69%3,487
314Steven L. Cravens OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 69%3,396
315Charles Davis TUCSON, AZ 69%3,994
316L. Ellis Davis COVINGTON GA, GA 69%3,764
317Tanya Dvarishkis BILLINGS, MT 69%3,817
318Mary M. French SACRAMENTO, CA 69%1,101
319James N. Gramenos DETROIT, MI 69%203
320Evangelina P. Hernandez OAKLAND, CA 69%2,756
321Gal Lahat DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 69%2,865
322Meryl L. Lissek NEWARK, NJ 69%2,268
323Sheila Lowther ATLANTA NORTH, GA 69%852
324Jon C. Lyons PHILADELPHIA, PA 69%1,865
325Michelle S. Marcus ALBANY, NY 69%1,903
326Sylke Merchan OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 69%2,937
327Barry A. Miller EVANSTON, IL 69%853
328Donna M. Montano PASADENA, CA 69%1,543
329Thomas M. Muth II MOBILE, AL 69%2,793
330Donald K. Neely BALTIMORE, MD 69%2,936
331Maria C. Northington FORT MYERS FL, FL 69%4,268
332Michael Pendola ORLAND PARK, IL 69%2,853
333Kathleen Scully-Hayes ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 69%2,020
334Ricky V. South MONTGOMERY, AL 69%4,386
335Heidi Southern DAYTON, OH 69%3,176
336Mary Sparks ALBANY, NY 69%1,863
337Douglas S. Stults OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 69%4,172
338David Tobias LONG ISLAND, NY 69%3,717
339Peggy M. Zirlin LONG BEACH, CA 69%503
340Christopher Ambrose LANSING, MI 68%3,854
341Robert Baker Jr. BALTIMORE, MD 68%3,185
342Kevin R. Barnes DAYTON, OH 68%4,261
343William G. Brown MINNEAPOLIS, MN 68%1,816
344J. Elaine Burke KNOXVILLE, TN 68%2,278
345Jay L. Cohen QUEENS, NY 68%1,256
346Denise A. Copeland BIRMINGHAM, AL 68%1,884
347William P. Diggs CHARLESTON SC, SC 68%3,604
348Ramona L. Fernandez LIVONIA MI, MI 68%3,248
349Irma J. Flottman COLUMBUS, OH 68%3,484
350Peter F. Gazda SAN ANTONIO, TX 68%4,009
351John F. Gehring ELKINS PARK, PA 68%1,270
352Robert Gonzalez JERSEY CITY, NJ 68%4,253
353Henry Hamilton DES MOINES, IA 68%3,677
354Lisa Hibner Olson SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 68%1,983
355Joseph M. Hillegas PHILADELPHIA, PA 68%469
356Tiffani T. Jake VALPARAISO IN, IN 68%1,154
357Donald R. Jensen SALT LAKE CITY, UT 68%101
358Donna A. Krappa NEWARK, NJ 68%2,626
359Kelly B. Lind ORANGE, CA 68%261
360Vanessa Lucas FAYETTEVILLE NC, NC 68%4,000
361Ghermann Magana PASADENA, CA 68%1,344
362Daniel J. Mages INDIANAPOLIS, IN 68%4,621
363Timothy Mangrum SEATTLE, WA 68%3,348
364William M. Manico BALTIMORE, MD 68%3,149
365Christopher Messina ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 68%2,377
366Terry Miller FORT WAYNE, IN 68%4,186
367Vivian W. Mittleman BALTIMORE, MD 68%154
368William K. Mueller SAN DIEGO, CA 68%2,914
369David R. Murchison MOBILE, AL 68%3,130
370Melvin G. Olmscheid BALTIMORE, MD 68%3,537
371Keith C. Pilkey KINGSPORT, TN 68%5,181
372Adrienne Porter FAYETTEVILLE NC, NC 68%3,970
373Linda Gail Roberts-Reap FRANKLIN TN, TN 68%2,747
374John E. Sandbothe DES MOINES, IA 68%2,811
375Leisha Self BALTIMORE, MD 68%1,831
376Philip J. Simon PASADENA, CA 68%1,581
377Verley J. Spivey ATLANTA NORTH, GA 68%877
378Jonathan Sprague FT LAUDERDALE, FL 68%3,542
379Nancy M. Stewart FRESNO, CA 68%3,072
380Nathaniel E. Strickler PEORIA, IL 68%1,376
381Peter V. Train HARRISBURG, PA 68%1,142
382Lesley Troope PASADENA, CA 68%1,817
383Timothy Turner INDIANAPOLIS, IN 68%2,030
384Andrew S. Weiss LONG ISLAND, NY 68%3,540
385J. Doug Wolfe SALT LAKE CITY, UT 68%3,760
386Paula Wordsworth RALEIGH, NC 68%3,953
387Marc A. Yerkey LONG BEACH, CA 68%1,034
388Michael D. Anderson MONTGOMERY, AL 67%2,101
389Renee S. Andrews-Turner NASHVILLE, TN 67%3,921
390Laura Bach HOUSTON WEST, TX 67%3,787
391Kristi Bellamy CHARLOTTE, NC 67%956
392Alan B. Berkowitz LONG ISLAND, NY 67%3,992
393Frederick W. Christian COLUMBIA SC, SC 67%1,959
394Michael F. Colligan PITTSBURGH, PA 67%323
395Arthur L. Conover COLUMBIA SC, SC 67%2,650
396Alaina Davis ST LOUIS, MO 67%934
397Kari Deming OAK PARK, MI 67%3,045
398Andrew Dixon III TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FL 67%3,536
399Margaret A. Donaghy QUEENS, NY 67%1,489
400Tom Duann NORWALK, CA 67%4,331

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).