All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 3 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 201–300 of 2044 judges
Office
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
611
Office
CREVE COEUR
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
1,032
Office
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
3,485
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
3,564
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
1,889
Office
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
217
Office
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
3,638
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
3,814
Office
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
1,165
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
5,436
Approval Rate
74%
Decisions
2,107
Office
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
1,685
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
3,804
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
201
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
3,635
Office
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
3,156
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
180
Office
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
2,991
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
2,409
Office
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
3,521
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
2,967
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
692
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
4,605
Office
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
1,563
Office
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
2,964
Office
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
3,330
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
3,203
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
1,517
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
3,742
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
883
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
2,961
Office
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
3,675
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
671
Office
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
290
Approval Rate
73%
Decisions
2,716
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
3,954
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
203
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
636
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
967
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
3,114
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
1,780
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
4,433
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
4,067
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
397
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
267
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
3,462
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
358
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
1,374
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
986
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
3,714
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
1,447
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
684
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
331
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
4,627
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
509
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
688
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
4,147
Office
Approval Rate
72%
Decisions
1,033
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
914
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
4,472
Office
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
2,295
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
1,827
Office
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
3,735
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
3,579
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
1,509
Office
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
1,778
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
3,741
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
2,626
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
4,381
Office
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
2,104
Office
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
1,538
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
1,669
Office
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
2,487
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
3,834
Office
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
1,244
Office
Approval Rate
71%
Decisions
1,785
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,819
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,290
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
267
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,187
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,783
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,310
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,608
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
222
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,405
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
4,164
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
1,195
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,660
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
1,972
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
2,221
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
1,406
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
2,258
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,463
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,127
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
2,398
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
3,774
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
671
Office
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
129
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
768
Approval Rate
70%
Decisions
2,720
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
201Stacy Gray FLORENCE, AL 74%611
202William E. Kumpe CREVE COEUR 74%1,032
203Brian W. Lemoine HARTFORD, CT 74%3,485
204Dennis M. Matulewicz LIVONIA MI, MI 74%3,564
205Daniel N. Shellhamer SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 74%1,889
206Marsha Stroup DENVER, CO 74%217
207Margaret M. Sullivan TACOMA, WA 74%3,638
208Michelle Thompson LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CA 74%3,814
209Angel X. Viera-Vargas SAN JUAN, PR 74%1,165
210Plauche F. Villere Jr. SACRAMENTO, CA 74%5,436
211Charlotte N. White NEW ORLEANS, LA 74%2,107
212Robert C. Asbille EVANSTON, IL 73%1,685
213Jonathan P. Baird LAWRENCE MA, MA 73%3,804
214O. Lisa Dabreu ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 73%201
215Clint Dorman GREENSBORO, NC 73%3,635
216John G. Farrell ALBANY, NY 73%3,156
217John M. Fitzpatrick PHILADELPHIA, PA 73%180
218Robert O. Foerster SAVANNAH, GA 73%2,991
219D. Randall Frye CHARLOTTE, NC 73%2,409
220Gloria W. Green FLORENCE, AL 73%3,521
221Gentry C.M. Hogan KINGSPORT, TN 73%2,967
222Truett M. Honeycutt DALLAS NORTH ODAR, TX 73%692
223Vincent P. Intoccia MONTGOMERY, AL 73%4,605
224Gregui J. Mercado SAN JUAN, PR 73%1,563
225Theresa Merrill NEWARK, NJ 73%2,964
226Jennifer Mills MEMPHIS, TN 73%3,330
227John M. Prince CINCINNATI, OH 73%3,203
228M. Reeves NEW YORK VARICK, NY 73%1,517
229Mary Ryerse CHARLOTTE, NC 73%3,742
230Robert Spurlin FT LAUDERDALE, FL 73%883
231Helen F. Strong HOUSTON WEST, TX 73%2,961
232Judith Torres SAN JUAN, PR 73%3,675
233Robert C. Tronvig Jr. SACRAMENTO, CA 73%671
234Bradlee S. Welton OAKLAND, CA 73%290
235Norman R. Zamboni ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 73%2,716
236Denzel R. Busick FARGO, ND 72%3,954
237L. K. Cooper Jr. BIRMINGHAM, AL 72%203
238Helen O. Evans GREENSBORO, NC 72%636
239Chris L. Gavras PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 72%967
240Christopher P. Grovich SEVEN FIELDS, PA 72%3,114
241Warren L. Hammond Jr. MOBILE, AL 72%1,780
242Joseph D. Jacobson MADISON, WI 72%4,433
243John Kooser SEVEN FIELDS, PA 72%4,067
244Frances P. Kuperman BALTIMORE, MD 72%397
245Margaret E. Luke NORWALK, CA 72%267
246Lisa Lunsford OAKLAND, CA 72%3,462
247Shirley M. Michaelson EVANSTON, IL 72%358
248Alan E. Michel MOBILE, AL 72%1,374
249Maria E. Quant SAN JUAN, PR 72%986
250Eric Schwarz ELKINS PARK, PA 72%3,714
251Regina L. Sleater SAN JOSE, CA 72%1,447
252Sarah B. Stewart GREENVILLE, SC 72%684
253Peter B. Storey MACON, GA 72%331
254William F. Taylor NASHVILLE, TN 72%4,627
255John Trunick MORENO VALLEY, CA 72%509
256Janice Ulan BALTIMORE, MD 72%688
257Albert J. Velasquez INDIANAPOLIS, IN 72%4,147
258Duane D. Young FRESNO, CA 72%1,033
259Stephen Bosch PHILADELPHIA EAST, PA 71%914
260Toby J. Buel Sr. CHARLESTON WV, WV 71%4,472
261Tin Tin Chen TUCSON, AZ 71%2,295
262Michael J. Davenport KINGSPORT, TN 71%1,827
263Lori L. Freund SPOKANE, WA 71%3,735
264Brian Kane ROCHESTER, NY 71%3,579
265Robert J. Labrum SALT LAKE CITY, UT 71%1,509
266Ronald D. Lahners OMAHA, NE 71%1,778
267Amy H. Naylor MONTGOMERY, AL 71%3,741
268Carol J. Pennock MIAMI OHO, FL 71%2,626
269Derek N. Phillips DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 71%4,381
270Robert Rideout RALEIGH, NC 71%2,104
271Caroline Siderius SPOKANE, WA 71%1,538
272John C. Tobin LONG BEACH, CA 71%1,669
273Debra M. Underwood OAKLAND, CA 71%2,487
274Louis J. Volz III NEW ORLEANS, LA 71%3,834
275William Wenzel CHICAGO, IL 71%1,244
276Robert Wright ALBANY, NY 71%1,785
277Louis Aliberti CLEVELAND, OH 70%3,819
278Tom Andrews DES MOINES, IA 70%3,290
279Michael Blume OAKLAND, CA 70%267
280J. Samuel Childs ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 70%3,187
281Yelanda Collins JACKSONVILLE, FL 70%3,783
282Amanda Craven GREENVILLE, SC 70%3,310
283Kelly Davis RALEIGH, NC 70%3,608
284James E. Deen Jr. CHATTANOOGA, TN 70%222
285Barbara Dunn PASADENA, CA 70%3,405
286Bradley Hanan ST LOUIS, MO 70%4,164
287Sigrid Irias LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CA 70%1,195
288Richard Jackson GREENSBORO, NC 70%3,660
289Frederick Johnson GREENSBORO, NC 70%1,972
290Stephanie M. Jones KNOXVILLE, TN 70%2,221
291Robert J. Kelly BOSTON, MA 70%1,406
292Frank M. Klinger MONTGOMERY, AL 70%2,258
293Jodi B. Levine OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 70%3,463
294Michael G. Logan CHICAGO, IL 70%3,127
295Jeffrey Mastin NHC BALTIMORE, MD 70%2,398
296Benjamin R. McMillion GREENSBORO, NC 70%3,774
297John H. Metz INDIANAPOLIS, IN 70%671
298Frederick Michaud SAN JOSE, CA 70%129
299Sandra H. Morales-Rosa PHILADELPHIA EAST, PA 70%768
300Alexis Murdock SAN ANTONIO, TX 70%2,720

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).