Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201 | Stacy Gray | FLORENCE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 74% | 611 | |
| 202 | William E. Kumpe | CREVE COEURLast decision Sep 2018 | 74% | 1,032 | |
| 203 | Brian W. Lemoine | HARTFORD, CTLast decision Jul 2026 | 74% | 3,485 | |
| 204 | Dennis M. Matulewicz | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Sep 2023 | 74% | 3,564 | |
| 205 | Daniel N. Shellhamer | SOUTH JERSEY, NJLast decision Sep 2020 | 74% | 1,889 | |
| 206 | Marsha Stroup | DENVER, COLast decision Sep 2016 | 74% | 217 | |
| 207 | Margaret M. Sullivan | TACOMA, WALast decision Jul 2026 | 74% | 3,638 | |
| 208 | Michelle Thompson | LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 74% | 3,814 | |
| 209 | Angel X. Viera-Vargas | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Jul 2026 | 74% | 1,165 | |
| 210 | Plauche F. Villere Jr. | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Sep 2025 | 74% | 5,436 | |
| 211 | Charlotte N. White | NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Sep 2023 | 74% | 2,107 | |
| 212 | Robert C. Asbille | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Sep 2019 | 73% | 1,685 | |
| 213 | Jonathan P. Baird | LAWRENCE MA, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 73% | 3,804 | |
| 214 | O. Lisa Dabreu | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Sep 2019 | 73% | 201 | |
| 215 | Clint Dorman | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 73% | 3,635 | |
| 216 | John G. Farrell | ALBANY, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 73% | 3,156 | |
| 217 | John M. Fitzpatrick | PHILADELPHIA, PALast decision Sep 2016 | 73% | 180 | |
| 218 | Robert O. Foerster | SAVANNAH, GALast decision Sep 2024 | 73% | 2,991 | |
| 219 | D. Randall Frye | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Sep 2022 | 73% | 2,409 | |
| 220 | Gloria W. Green | FLORENCE, ALLast decision Sep 2025 | 73% | 3,521 | |
| 221 | Gentry C.M. Hogan | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 73% | 2,967 | |
| 222 | Truett M. Honeycutt | DALLAS NORTH ODAR, TXLast decision Sep 2017 | 73% | 692 | |
| 223 | Vincent P. Intoccia | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 73% | 4,605 | |
| 224 | Gregui J. Mercado | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Sep 2020 | 73% | 1,563 | |
| 225 | Theresa Merrill | NEWARK, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 73% | 2,964 | |
| 226 | Jennifer Mills | MEMPHIS, TNLast decision Sep 2025 | 73% | 3,330 | |
| 227 | John M. Prince | CINCINNATI, OHLast decision Sep 2025 | 73% | 3,203 | |
| 228 | M. Reeves | NEW YORK VARICK, NYLast decision Sep 2022 | 73% | 1,517 | |
| 229 | Mary Ryerse | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 73% | 3,742 | |
| 230 | Robert Spurlin | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Sep 2018 | 73% | 883 | |
| 231 | Helen F. Strong | HOUSTON WEST, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 73% | 2,961 | |
| 232 | Judith Torres | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Jul 2026 | 73% | 3,675 | |
| 233 | Robert C. Tronvig Jr. | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 73% | 671 | |
| 234 | Bradlee S. Welton | OAKLAND, CALast decision Sep 2017 | 73% | 290 | |
| 235 | Norman R. Zamboni | ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FLLast decision Sep 2024 | 73% | 2,716 | |
| 236 | Denzel R. Busick | FARGO, NDLast decision Sep 2023 | 72% | 3,954 | |
| 237 | L. K. Cooper Jr. | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2016 | 72% | 203 | |
| 238 | Helen O. Evans | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Sep 2019 | 72% | 636 | |
| 239 | Chris L. Gavras | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Sep 2018 | 72% | 967 | |
| 240 | Christopher P. Grovich | SEVEN FIELDS, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 72% | 3,114 | |
| 241 | Warren L. Hammond Jr. | MOBILE, ALLast decision Sep 2020 | 72% | 1,780 | |
| 242 | Joseph D. Jacobson | MADISON, WILast decision Jul 2026 | 72% | 4,433 | |
| 243 | John Kooser | SEVEN FIELDS, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 72% | 4,067 | |
| 244 | Frances P. Kuperman | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2017 | 72% | 397 | |
| 245 | Margaret E. Luke | NORWALK, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 72% | 267 | |
| 246 | Lisa Lunsford | OAKLAND, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 72% | 3,462 | |
| 247 | Shirley M. Michaelson | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Sep 2017 | 72% | 358 | |
| 248 | Alan E. Michel | MOBILE, ALLast decision Sep 2020 | 72% | 1,374 | |
| 249 | Maria E. Quant | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Jul 2026 | 72% | 986 | |
| 250 | Eric Schwarz | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 72% | 3,714 | |
| 251 | Regina L. Sleater | SAN JOSE, CALast decision Sep 2020 | 72% | 1,447 | |
| 252 | Sarah B. Stewart | GREENVILLE, SCLast decision Sep 2017 | 72% | 684 | |
| 253 | Peter B. Storey | MACON, GALast decision Sep 2018 | 72% | 331 | |
| 254 | William F. Taylor | NASHVILLE, TNLast decision Sep 2025 | 72% | 4,627 | |
| 255 | John Trunick | MORENO VALLEY, CALast decision Sep 2019 | 72% | 509 | |
| 256 | Janice Ulan | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2019 | 72% | 688 | |
| 257 | Albert J. Velasquez | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Sep 2025 | 72% | 4,147 | |
| 258 | Duane D. Young | FRESNO, CALast decision Sep 2020 | 72% | 1,033 | |
| 259 | Stephen Bosch | PHILADELPHIA EAST, PALast decision Sep 2020 | 71% | 914 | |
| 260 | Toby J. Buel Sr. | CHARLESTON WV, WVLast decision Sep 2025 | 71% | 4,472 | |
| 261 | Tin Tin Chen | TUCSON, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 71% | 2,295 | |
| 262 | Michael J. Davenport | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Sep 2018 | 71% | 1,827 | |
| 263 | Lori L. Freund | SPOKANE, WALast decision Jul 2026 | 71% | 3,735 | |
| 264 | Brian Kane | ROCHESTER, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 71% | 3,579 | |
| 265 | Robert J. Labrum | SALT LAKE CITY, UTLast decision Sep 2024 | 71% | 1,509 | |
| 266 | Ronald D. Lahners | OMAHA, NELast decision Sep 2023 | 71% | 1,778 | |
| 267 | Amy H. Naylor | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 71% | 3,741 | |
| 268 | Carol J. Pennock | MIAMI OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 71% | 2,626 | |
| 269 | Derek N. Phillips | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 71% | 4,381 | |
| 270 | Robert Rideout | RALEIGH, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 71% | 2,104 | |
| 271 | Caroline Siderius | SPOKANE, WALast decision Sep 2025 | 71% | 1,538 | |
| 272 | John C. Tobin | LONG BEACH, CALast decision Sep 2024 | 71% | 1,669 | |
| 273 | Debra M. Underwood | OAKLAND, CALast decision Sep 2025 | 71% | 2,487 | |
| 274 | Louis J. Volz III | NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Sep 2025 | 71% | 3,834 | |
| 275 | William Wenzel | CHICAGO, ILLast decision Sep 2022 | 71% | 1,244 | |
| 276 | Robert Wright | ALBANY, NYLast decision Sep 2020 | 71% | 1,785 | |
| 277 | Louis Aliberti | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,819 | |
| 278 | Tom Andrews | DES MOINES, IALast decision Sep 2025 | 70% | 3,290 | |
| 279 | Michael Blume | OAKLAND, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 70% | 267 | |
| 280 | J. Samuel Childs | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,187 | |
| 281 | Yelanda Collins | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,783 | |
| 282 | Amanda Craven | GREENVILLE, SCLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,310 | |
| 283 | Kelly Davis | RALEIGH, NCLast decision Sep 2025 | 70% | 3,608 | |
| 284 | James E. Deen Jr. | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Sep 2016 | 70% | 222 | |
| 285 | Barbara Dunn | PASADENA, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,405 | |
| 286 | Bradley Hanan | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 4,164 | |
| 287 | Sigrid Irias | LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 1,195 | |
| 288 | Richard Jackson | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,660 | |
| 289 | Frederick Johnson | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Sep 2021 | 70% | 1,972 | |
| 290 | Stephanie M. Jones | KNOXVILLE, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 2,221 | |
| 291 | Robert J. Kelly | BOSTON, MALast decision Sep 2019 | 70% | 1,406 | |
| 292 | Frank M. Klinger | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Sep 2022 | 70% | 2,258 | |
| 293 | Jodi B. Levine | OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,463 | |
| 294 | Michael G. Logan | CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,127 | |
| 295 | Jeffrey Mastin | NHC BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2025 | 70% | 2,398 | |
| 296 | Benjamin R. McMillion | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 3,774 | |
| 297 | John H. Metz | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Sep 2017 | 70% | 671 | |
| 298 | Frederick Michaud | SAN JOSE, CALast decision Sep 2016 | 70% | 129 | |
| 299 | Sandra H. Morales-Rosa | PHILADELPHIA EAST, PALast decision Mar 2018 | 70% | 768 | |
| 300 | Alexis Murdock | SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 70% | 2,720 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.