All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 5 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 401–500 of 2044 judges
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
528
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,978
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,511
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
630
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
4,626
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
523
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,611
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,615
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,608
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,686
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
629
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,049
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,761
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
2,939
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,371
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,904
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,617
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,642
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,574
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,261
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,131
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,153
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,469
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,269
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
467
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
376
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,940
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
926
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
2,114
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
3,058
Office
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,082
Approval Rate
67%
Decisions
1,116
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
2,761
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
149
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
1,842
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
969
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
3,578
Office
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
2,541
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
4,366
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
4,055
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
125
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
382
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
906
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
1,958
Office
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
3,250
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
3,149
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
4,242
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
1,816
Office
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
4,097
Office
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
3,461
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
4,207
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
3,680
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
2,218
Office
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
346
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
3,539
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
3,473
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
825
Office
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
4,227
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
3,054
Office
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
3,544
Office
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
357
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
4,214
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
3,756
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
188
Approval Rate
66%
Decisions
455
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,469
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,232
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
1,384
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,057
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,389
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,399
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,842
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
298
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,953
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,971
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,435
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,488
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
1,935
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
1,162
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
854
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
648
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,843
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
251
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,805
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,940
486 K. Kwon
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,752
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,477
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,416
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,374
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,680
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,821
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,879
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
1,142
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
365
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
4,000
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
1,262
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,913
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,950
Office
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
2,572
Approval Rate
65%
Decisions
3,370
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
401Robert A. Evans LONG BEACH, CA 67%528
402Nikki A. Flowers ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 67%1,978
403Mary Gallagher Dilley SEATTLE, WA 67%1,511
404Eric L. Glazer BUFFALO, NY 67%630
405Robert Grant ALEXANDRIA, LA 67%4,626
406Michael Hazel NHC ST LOUIS, MO 67%523
407B. Hobbs EUGENE, OR 67%3,611
408Serena S. Hong SAN RAFAEL, CA 67%3,615
409Wendy Hunn FT LAUDERDALE, FL 67%3,608
410Theresa R. Jenkins CHARLOTTE, NC 67%3,686
411Jean R. Kerins SACRAMENTO, CA 67%629
412Maria N. Kusznir MONTGOMERY, AL 67%1,049
413Alexander G. Levine BRONX, NY 67%1,761
414Elizabeth R. Lishner LOS ANGELES WEST, CA 67%2,939
415Paul McAdam COVINGTON GA, GA 67%3,371
416Kerry Morgan FRANKLIN TN, TN 67%3,904
417S. Charles Murray ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 67%3,617
418James H. Packer BOSTON, MA 67%1,642
419David Page WICHITA, KS 67%3,574
420Raul C. Pardo ALBUQUERQUE, NM 67%1,261
421Luciannette Planas SAN JUAN, PR 67%1,131
422Susan Preston MORGANTOWN, WV 67%3,153
423Ahavaha Pyrtel MADISON, WI 67%3,469
424Thomas M. Ray LAS VEGAS, NV 67%3,269
425Earl W. Shaffer COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 67%467
426Harry E. Siegrist ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 67%376
427James Stewart TULSA OHO, OK 67%1,940
428Suanne S. Strauss ELKINS PARK, PA 67%926
429Selwyn S. Walters BRONX, NY 67%2,114
430David B. Washington MINNEAPOLIS, MN 67%3,058
431Mark Yasutomi HONOLULU, HI 67%1,082
432Gloria B. York LEXINGTON, KY 67%1,116
433Gary Ball BALTIMORE, MD 66%2,761
434Peter R. Bronson CLEVELAND, OH 66%149
435Carol L. Buck SACRAMENTO, CA 66%1,842
436Kellie Campbell COLUMBIA MO, MO 66%969
437James Cole Cartledge MIAMI OHO, FL 66%3,578
438Ken H. Chau PASADENA, CA 66%2,541
439M. Drew Crislip CHARLESTON WV, WV 66%4,366
440Harold D. Davis FORT SMITH, AR 66%4,055
441Craig De Bernardis ELKINS PARK, PA 66%125
442Gary Elliott TACOMA WA, WA 66%382
443Janis Estrada DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 66%906
444Wendell C. Fowler LITTLE ROCK, AR 66%1,958
445Rosael Gautier SAN JUAN, PR 66%3,250
446K. Dickson Grissom KNOXVILLE, TN 66%3,149
447Ryan Johannes FORT MYERS FL, FL 66%4,242
448Ronald T. Jordan INDIANAPOLIS, IN 66%1,816
449James E. MacDonald EVANSTON, IL 66%4,097
450Gregory A. Maddox TUPELO, MS 66%3,461
451Paula M. Martin PORTLAND OR, OR 66%4,207
452Carl C. McGhee TAMPA OHO, FL 66%3,680
453Frederick McGrath CHATTANOOGA, TN 66%2,218
454John D. Moreen PASADENA, CA 66%346
455S. Pines PORTLAND OR, OR 66%3,539
456Dennis J. Raterink GRAND RAPIDS, MI 66%3,473
457Daniel L. Rubini ELKINS PARK, PA 66%825
458Joseph T. Scruton ROANOKE, VA 66%4,227
459Jonathan T. Shoenholz COLUMBIA SC, SC 66%3,054
460Pedro Tejada-Rivera ORLANDO, FL 66%3,544
461Scott A. Tews MIAMI, FL 66%357
462Linda Thomasson PORTLAND OR, OR 66%4,214
463Shelette Veal INDIANAPOLIS, IN 66%3,756
464Janice C. Volkman PHILADELPHIA, PA 66%188
465Barry L. Williams ATLANTA NORTH, GA 66%455
466David J. Agatstein LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CA 65%2,469
467Michelle I. Allen LONG ISLAND, NY 65%2,232
468J. M. Brounoff DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 65%1,384
469Susan W. Conyers OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 65%2,057
470Bruce T. Cooper PASADENA, CA 65%3,389
471John P. Costello ROCHESTER, NY 65%2,399
472Rossana L. D'Alessio FT LAUDERDALE, FL 65%3,842
473Collin Delaney NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 65%298
474Deirdre O. Dexter TULSA OHO, OK 65%3,953
475Ruy V. Diaz SAN JUAN, PR 65%2,971
476Marci P. Eaton PADUCAH, KY 65%3,435
477Robert M. Erickson SAN FRANCISCO, CA 65%2,488
478Richard P. Gartner ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 65%1,935
479Paul Gaughen TACOMA, WA 65%1,162
480Odell Grooms SACRAMENTO, CA 65%854
481Mark Hecht NEW YORK, NY 65%648
482Francis Hurley BOSTON, MA 65%2,843
483Melvyn B. Kalt OAK PARK, MI 65%251
484Kevin Kenneally JERSEY CITY, NJ 65%3,805
485Edward Kristof VALPARAISO IN, IN 65%2,940
486K. Kwon SAN RAFAEL, CA 65%3,752
487Michael A. Lehr KANSAS CITY, MO 65%3,477
488Shannon Mashburn TUPELO, MS 65%3,416
489John R. Mason SAVANNAH, GA 65%2,374
490Melissa J. McIntosh TAMPA OHO, FL 65%2,680
491Sandra M. McKenna QUEENS, NY 65%2,821
492Jason A. Miller NEW YORK VARICK, NY 65%3,879
493Lynn Neugebauer BRONX, NY 65%1,142
494James R. Norris INDIANAPOLIS, IN 65%365
495Ann G. Paschall GREENVILLE, SC 65%4,000
496Robert J. Phares RALEIGH, NC 65%1,262
497John Priester DES MOINES, IA 65%2,913
498Laura L. Robinson MOBILE, AL 65%3,950
499Robert R. Schriver QUEENS, NY 65%2,572
500Jeanne M. VanderHeide RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX, TX 65%3,370

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).