Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 401 | Robert A. Evans | LONG BEACH, CALast decision Sep 2017 | 67% | 528 | |
| 402 | Nikki A. Flowers | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Sep 2022 | 67% | 1,978 | |
| 403 | Mary Gallagher Dilley | SEATTLE, WALast decision Sep 2020 | 67% | 1,511 | |
| 404 | Eric L. Glazer | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2018 | 67% | 630 | |
| 405 | Robert Grant | ALEXANDRIA, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 4,626 | |
| 406 | Michael Hazel | NHC ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Sep 2017 | 67% | 523 | |
| 407 | B. Hobbs | EUGENE, ORLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,611 | |
| 408 | Serena S. Hong | SAN RAFAEL, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,615 | |
| 409 | Wendy Hunn | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,608 | |
| 410 | Theresa R. Jenkins | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,686 | |
| 411 | Jean R. Kerins | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Sep 2019 | 67% | 629 | |
| 412 | Maria N. Kusznir | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Sep 2018 | 67% | 1,049 | |
| 413 | Alexander G. Levine | BRONX, NYLast decision Sep 2021 | 67% | 1,761 | |
| 414 | Elizabeth R. Lishner | LOS ANGELES WEST, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 2,939 | |
| 415 | Paul McAdam | COVINGTON GA, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,371 | |
| 416 | Kerry Morgan | FRANKLIN TN, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,904 | |
| 417 | S. Charles Murray | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,617 | |
| 418 | James H. Packer | BOSTON, MALast decision Sep 2020 | 67% | 1,642 | |
| 419 | David Page | WICHITA, KSLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,574 | |
| 420 | Raul C. Pardo | ALBUQUERQUE, NMLast decision Sep 2018 | 67% | 1,261 | |
| 421 | Luciannette Planas | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 1,131 | |
| 422 | Susan Preston | MORGANTOWN, WVLast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,153 | |
| 423 | Ahavaha Pyrtel | MADISON, WILast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 3,469 | |
| 424 | Thomas M. Ray | LAS VEGAS, NVLast decision Sep 2025 | 67% | 3,269 | |
| 425 | Earl W. Shaffer | COLORADO SPRINGS, COLast decision Sep 2017 | 67% | 467 | |
| 426 | Harry E. Siegrist | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Sep 2017 | 67% | 376 | |
| 427 | James Stewart | TULSA OHO, OKLast decision Sep 2022 | 67% | 1,940 | |
| 428 | Suanne S. Strauss | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Sep 2018 | 67% | 926 | |
| 429 | Selwyn S. Walters | BRONX, NYLast decision Sep 2024 | 67% | 2,114 | |
| 430 | David B. Washington | MINNEAPOLIS, MNLast decision Sep 2022 | 67% | 3,058 | |
| 431 | Mark Yasutomi | HONOLULU, HILast decision Jul 2026 | 67% | 1,082 | |
| 432 | Gloria B. York | LEXINGTON, KYLast decision Sep 2018 | 67% | 1,116 | |
| 433 | Gary Ball | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 2,761 | |
| 434 | Peter R. Bronson | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Sep 2016 | 66% | 149 | |
| 435 | Carol L. Buck | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Sep 2021 | 66% | 1,842 | |
| 436 | Kellie Campbell | COLUMBIA MO, MOLast decision Sep 2025 | 66% | 969 | |
| 437 | James Cole Cartledge | MIAMI OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 3,578 | |
| 438 | Ken H. Chau | PASADENA, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 2,541 | |
| 439 | M. Drew Crislip | CHARLESTON WV, WVLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 4,366 | |
| 440 | Harold D. Davis | FORT SMITH, ARLast decision Sep 2025 | 66% | 4,055 | |
| 441 | Craig De Bernardis | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Sep 2016 | 66% | 125 | |
| 442 | Gary Elliott | TACOMA WA, WALast decision Sep 2016 | 66% | 382 | |
| 443 | Janis Estrada | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Sep 2018 | 66% | 906 | |
| 444 | Wendell C. Fowler | LITTLE ROCK, ARLast decision Sep 2023 | 66% | 1,958 | |
| 445 | Rosael Gautier | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 3,250 | |
| 446 | K. Dickson Grissom | KNOXVILLE, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 3,149 | |
| 447 | Ryan Johannes | FORT MYERS FL, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 4,242 | |
| 448 | Ronald T. Jordan | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Sep 2020 | 66% | 1,816 | |
| 449 | James E. MacDonald | EVANSTON, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 4,097 | |
| 450 | Gregory A. Maddox | TUPELO, MSLast decision Sep 2025 | 66% | 3,461 | |
| 451 | Paula M. Martin | PORTLAND OR, ORLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 4,207 | |
| 452 | Carl C. McGhee | TAMPA OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 3,680 | |
| 453 | Frederick McGrath | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Sep 2021 | 66% | 2,218 | |
| 454 | John D. Moreen | PASADENA, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 66% | 346 | |
| 455 | S. Pines | PORTLAND OR, ORLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 3,539 | |
| 456 | Dennis J. Raterink | GRAND RAPIDS, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 3,473 | |
| 457 | Daniel L. Rubini | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Sep 2019 | 66% | 825 | |
| 458 | Joseph T. Scruton | ROANOKE, VALast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 4,227 | |
| 459 | Julicel Sepulveda Anavitarte | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 2,868 | |
| 460 | Jonathan T. Shoenholz | COLUMBIA SC, SCLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 3,054 | |
| 461 | Pedro Tejada-Rivera | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Sep 2025 | 66% | 3,544 | |
| 462 | Scott A. Tews | MIAMI, FLLast decision Sep 2016 | 66% | 357 | |
| 463 | Linda Thomasson | PORTLAND OR, ORLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 4,214 | |
| 464 | Shelette Veal | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 66% | 3,756 | |
| 465 | Janice C. Volkman | PHILADELPHIA, PALast decision Sep 2016 | 66% | 188 | |
| 466 | Barry L. Williams | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2017 | 66% | 455 | |
| 467 | David J. Agatstein | LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CALast decision Sep 2021 | 65% | 2,469 | |
| 468 | Michelle I. Allen | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 2,232 | |
| 469 | J. M. Brounoff | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Sep 2020 | 65% | 1,384 | |
| 470 | Susan W. Conyers | OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLast decision Sep 2021 | 65% | 2,057 | |
| 471 | Bruce T. Cooper | PASADENA, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 3,389 | |
| 472 | John P. Costello | ROCHESTER, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 65% | 2,399 | |
| 473 | Rossana L. D'Alessio | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 3,842 | |
| 474 | Collin Delaney | NHC FALLS CHURCH, DCLast decision Sep 2019 | 65% | 298 | |
| 475 | Deirdre O. Dexter | TULSA OHO, OKLast decision Sep 2025 | 65% | 3,953 | |
| 476 | Ruy V. Diaz | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 2,971 | |
| 477 | Marci P. Eaton | PADUCAH, KYLast decision Sep 2025 | 65% | 3,435 | |
| 478 | Robert M. Erickson | SAN FRANCISCO, CALast decision Sep 2023 | 65% | 2,488 | |
| 479 | Richard P. Gartner | ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FLLast decision Sep 2025 | 65% | 1,935 | |
| 480 | Paul Gaughen | TACOMA, WALast decision Sep 2021 | 65% | 1,162 | |
| 481 | Odell Grooms | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Sep 2025 | 65% | 854 | |
| 482 | Mark Hecht | NEW YORK, NYLast decision Sep 2018 | 65% | 648 | |
| 483 | Francis Hurley | BOSTON, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 2,843 | |
| 484 | Melvyn B. Kalt | OAK PARK, MILast decision Sep 2018 | 65% | 251 | |
| 485 | Kevin Kenneally | JERSEY CITY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 3,805 | |
| 486 | Edward Kristof | VALPARAISO IN, INLast decision Sep 2024 | 65% | 2,940 | |
| 487 | K. Kwon | SAN RAFAEL, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 3,752 | |
| 488 | Michael A. Lehr | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 3,477 | |
| 489 | Shannon Mashburn | TUPELO, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 3,416 | |
| 490 | John R. Mason | SAVANNAH, GALast decision Sep 2021 | 65% | 2,374 | |
| 491 | Melissa J. McIntosh | TAMPA OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 2,680 | |
| 492 | Sandra M. McKenna | QUEENS, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 2,821 | |
| 493 | Jason A. Miller | NEW YORK VARICK, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 3,879 | |
| 494 | Lynn Neugebauer | BRONX, NYLast decision Sep 2019 | 65% | 1,142 | |
| 495 | James R. Norris | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Sep 2017 | 65% | 365 | |
| 496 | Ann G. Paschall | GREENVILLE, SCLast decision Sep 2025 | 65% | 4,000 | |
| 497 | Robert J. Phares | RALEIGH, NCLast decision Sep 2018 | 65% | 1,262 | |
| 498 | John Priester | DES MOINES, IALast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 2,913 | |
| 499 | Laura L. Robinson | MOBILE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 3,950 | |
| 500 | Robert R. Schriver | QUEENS, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 65% | 2,572 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.