All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 18 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1701–1800 of 2044 judges
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,228
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,709
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,137
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,294
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,254
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
1,986
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,233
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,125
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
1,267
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,061
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
365
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
1,290
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,556
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,257
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
970
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,917
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
3,306
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
3,140
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
955
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
1,242
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
726
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
814
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
3,923
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
2,980
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
562
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
3,677
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
996
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
3,370
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
2,755
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
1,096
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
2,512
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
857
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
3,095
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
951
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
2,938
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
3,540
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
4,263
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
2,387
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
4,012
Office
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
2,117
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
3,809
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
3,649
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
538
Approval Rate
41%
Decisions
3,449
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
3,661
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
2,678
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
3,781
1748 Amy Chau
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
1,177
Office
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
1,774
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
1,406
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
3,269
Office
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
3,447
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
1,856
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
887
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
600
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
2,118
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
4,035
Office
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
2,449
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
3,491
Office
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
373
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
506
Office
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
1,764
Office
CREVE COEUR
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
2,063
Office
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
1,411
Office
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
4,144
1766 John Pope
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
459
Office
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
1,502
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
3,263
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
2,451
1770 Amy Uren
Office
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
1,924
Office
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
630
Approval Rate
40%
Decisions
2,136
Office
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
1,854
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
2,336
Office
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
1,712
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
284
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
4,332
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
1,845
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
4,846
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
4,253
Office
CREVE COEUR
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
2,235
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
3,740
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
1,914
Office
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
2,807
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
1,957
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
1,780
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
413
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
164
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
1,365
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
109
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
3,264
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
2,961
Office
Approval Rate
39%
Decisions
2,879
Office
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
2,711
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
1,537
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
2,838
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
414
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
596
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
3,674
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
595
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1701Jessica Marie Johnson PHILADELPHIA, PA 42%2,228
1702Michael S. Kaczmarek PITTSBURGH, PA 42%2,709
1703Theodore Kim WASHINGTON, DC 42%3,137
1704Kathleen Laub DENVER, CO 42%2,294
1705Michael D. Mance TOPEKA KS, KS 42%2,254
1706Carol G. Moore CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 42%1,986
1707Suhirjahaan Morehead CHATTANOOGA, TN 42%3,233
1708Vadim Mozyrsky PORTLAND OR, OR 42%3,125
1709Julie Nestler DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 42%1,267
1710Jack Penca DOVER, DE 42%2,061
1711Deborah L. Rose TULSA, OK 42%365
1712Jeanette Schrand VALPARAISO IN, IN 42%1,290
1713Linda D. Taylor SAVANNAH, GA 42%2,556
1714Laurie Wardell CHICAGO, IL 42%3,257
1715Andrea L. Wirth KNOXVILLE, TN 42%970
1716John M. Wood PEORIA, IL 42%3,917
1717Kenneth Ayers NEWARK, NJ 41%3,306
1718Asad M. Ba-Yunus ALBANY, NY 41%3,140
1719Kenneth E. Ball ORANGE, CA 41%955
1720Eric S. Basse SEATTLE, WA 41%1,242
1721Peter F. Belli SACRAMENTO, CA 41%726
1722Debra Bice NHC ST LOUIS, MO 41%814
1723Katherine W. Brown SAN ANTONIO, TX 41%3,923
1724Robert Freedman ALBUQUERQUE, NM 41%2,980
1725Patricia M. French LAWRENCE MA, MA 41%562
1726Joyce Frost-Wolf TACOMA, WA 41%3,677
1727James Gabello ROANOKE, VA 41%996
1728Kristen Glover COVINGTON GA, GA 41%3,370
1729Seth I. Grossman NEW YORK, NY 41%2,755
1730Christine Hilleren NEW ORLEANS, LA 41%1,096
1731Carolyn Keen KINGSPORT, TN 41%2,512
1732Benita A. Lobo METAIRIE, LA 41%857
1733John Loughlin ALBANY, NY 41%3,095
1734Stephanie Martz SEATTLE, WA 41%951
1735Patricia S. McKay OAK PARK, MI 41%2,938
1736Nathan Mellman CHICAGO, IL 41%3,540
1737Patricia Melvin JACKSON MS OHO, MS 41%4,263
1738Jerome L. Munford BIRMINGHAM, AL 41%2,387
1739Anne-Marie Ofori-Acquaah RALEIGH, NC 41%4,012
1740Deborah F. Sanders COLUMBUS, OH 41%2,117
1741Jarrod Tranguch WILKES BARRE, PA 41%3,809
1742Deborah J. Van Vleck ALBUQUERQUE, NM 41%3,649
1743Lawrence D. Wheeler LOS ANGELES WEST, CA 41%538
1744Penny Wilkov SAN ANTONIO, TX 41%3,449
1745Ben Barnett SAN ANTONIO, TX 40%3,661
1746Carol L. Boorady COLUMBIA MO, MO 40%2,678
1747Richard T. Breen LOS ANGELES WEST, CA 40%3,781
1748Amy Chau MORENO VALLEY, CA 40%1,177
1749Craig Denney RENO, NV 40%1,774
1750Osly F. Deramus RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX, TX 40%1,406
1751John M. Dowling NEW ORLEANS, LA 40%3,269
1752Joseph R. Doyle ST LOUIS, MO 40%3,447
1753Paula Garrety WILKES BARRE, PA 40%1,856
1754Tracy Henry ATLANTA NORTH, GA 40%887
1755Susan Hoffman LOS ANGELES WEST, CA 40%600
1756Charlie M. Johnson NHC BALTIMORE, MD 40%2,118
1757Howard Kauffman HARRISBURG, PA 40%4,035
1758Elizabeth W. Koennecke SYRACUSE, NY 40%2,449
1759Lissette Labrousse FT LAUDERDALE, FL 40%3,491
1760Roy LaRoche OAK PARK, MI 40%373
1761David J. Manley LITTLE ROCK, AR 40%506
1762Maribeth McMahon PADUCAH, KY 40%1,764
1763Robert G. O'Blennis CREVE COEUR 40%2,063
1764Gerardo Perez METAIRIE, LA 40%1,411
1765Craig R. Petersen SAVANNAH, GA 40%4,144
1766John Pope NHC CHICAGO, IL 40%459
1767Virginia M. Robinson SEATTLE, WA 40%1,502
1768Matilda Surh SAN FRANCISCO, CA 40%3,263
1769Elving L. Torres ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 40%2,451
1770Amy Uren MACON, GA 40%1,924
1771G. Ross Wheatley STOCKTON, CA 40%630
1772Ben Willner NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NM 40%2,136
1773M. J. Adams SEATTLE, WA 39%1,854
1774Nathan Brown CHARLESTON WV, WV 39%2,336
1775Linda S. Crovella RICHMOND, VA 39%1,712
1776Carolyn Ebbers SHREVEPORT, LA 39%284
1777Jim Fraiser NEW ORLEANS, LA 39%4,332
1778Theodore W. Grippo NHC CHICAGO, IL 39%1,845
1779Clarence Guthrie BIRMINGHAM, AL 39%4,846
1780Matthew C. Kawalek COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 39%4,253
1781Christal Key CREVE COEUR 39%2,235
1782Carol L. Latham MONTGOMERY, AL 39%3,740
1783Timothy J. Malloy MILWAUKEE, WI 39%1,914
1784Colleen M. Mamelka DETROIT, MI 39%2,807
1785Rudolph Murgo PORTLAND OR, OR 39%1,957
1786Lisa B. Parrish ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 39%1,780
1787Mark C. Ramsey SACRAMENTO, CA 39%413
1788Douglas M. Rawald BALTIMORE, MD 39%164
1789Roger L. Reynolds LEXINGTON, KY 39%1,365
1790Judson Scott SAN FRANCISCO, CA 39%109
1791Ronald J. Thomas NEW HAVEN, CT 39%3,264
1792Michael Werner KANSAS CITY, MO 39%2,961
1793Charles Woode ST LOUIS, MO 39%2,879
1794L. R. BaileySmith RICHMOND, VA 38%2,711
1795Terry M. Banks TOLEDO OH, OH 38%1,537
1796Peter Beekman CLEVELAND, OH 38%2,838
1797W. Thomas Bundy SHREVEPORT, LA 38%414
1798Loranzo Fleming ATLANTA NORTH, GA 38%596
1799Gregory J. Froehlich JACKSONVILLE, FL 38%3,674
1800Julia D. Gibbs NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 38%595

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).