Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1901 | Jo Ann L. Draper | TUPELO, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 33% | 2,543 | |
| 1902 | Richard Furcolo | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 33% | 3,180 | |
| 1903 | Lloyd E. Hartford | BILLINGS, MTLast decision Sep 2018 | 33% | 490 | |
| 1904 | Marc Jones | SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 33% | 2,203 | |
| 1905 | Robert A. Kelly | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 33% | 3,663 | |
| 1906 | Michael A. Krasnow | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 33% | 3,111 | |
| 1907 | Barbara C. Marquardt | SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Sep 2016 | 33% | 258 | |
| 1908 | Michael McKenna | HARTFORD, CTLast decision Sep 2022 | 33% | 1,716 | |
| 1909 | George A. Mills III | MORGANTOWN, WVLast decision Sep 2017 | 33% | 647 | |
| 1910 | Patrick H. Morrison | SPRINGFIELD MO, MOLast decision Sep 2019 | 33% | 1,248 | |
| 1911 | Steven M. Rachal | ALEXANDRIA, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 33% | 3,409 | |
| 1912 | Roger W. Thomas | MINNEAPOLIS, MNLast decision Sep 2017 | 33% | 815 | |
| 1913 | Dante M. Alegre | PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 32% | 3,901 | |
| 1914 | Kevin Batik | FORT WORTH, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 32% | 3,962 | |
| 1915 | Martha Bower | PROVIDENCE, RILast decision Sep 2020 | 32% | 1,800 | |
| 1916 | Clark S. Cheney | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2017 | 32% | 194 | |
| 1917 | Diana J. Coburn | LONG BEACH, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 32% | 3,162 | |
| 1918 | Bradley L. Davis | LITTLE ROCK, ARLast decision Jul 2026 | 32% | 4,165 | |
| 1919 | Patrick R. Digby | FLORENCE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 32% | 3,312 | |
| 1920 | M. D. Evans | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Sep 2018 | 32% | 338 | |
| 1921 | John A. Fraser | JOHNSTOWN, PALast decision Sep 2023 | 32% | 2,441 | |
| 1922 | Christopher R. Inama | BILLINGS, MTLast decision Sep 2021 | 32% | 1,603 | |
| 1923 | Michele M. Kelley | BILLINGS, MTLast decision Sep 2024 | 32% | 2,520 | |
| 1924 | Elizabeth C. Palacios | MIAMI, FLLast decision Sep 2018 | 32% | 325 | |
| 1925 | Renita K. Bivins | CINCINNATI, OHLast decision Sep 2023 | 31% | 1,768 | |
| 1926 | Michael Carr | NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NMLast decision Jul 2026 | 31% | 2,032 | |
| 1927 | Amber Downs | TAMPA OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 31% | 3,076 | |
| 1928 | Emily Y. Howard | MACON, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 31% | 4,051 | |
| 1929 | Jamie Mendelson | DENVER, COLast decision Sep 2019 | 31% | 936 | |
| 1930 | Paul R. Armstrong | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Sep 2021 | 30% | 2,869 | |
| 1931 | Jonathan Eliot | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Sep 2016 | 30% | 213 | |
| 1932 | Allen G. Erickson | SEATTLE, WALast decision Jul 2026 | 30% | 3,441 | |
| 1933 | Joseph G. Hajjar | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 30% | 3,423 | |
| 1934 | Katherine Jecklin | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 30% | 2,157 | |
| 1935 | Rebecca L. Jones | TACOMA, WALast decision Sep 2022 | 30% | 1,438 | |
| 1936 | Sean McKee | MT PLEASANT MI, MILast decision Sep 2017 | 30% | 196 | |
| 1937 | Kathleen Winters | TOLEDO OH, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 30% | 3,163 | |
| 1938 | Francine L. Applewhite | NHC FALLS CHURCH, DCLast decision Sep 2019 | 29% | 796 | |
| 1939 | Richard E. Guida | HARRISBURG, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 29% | 4,569 | |
| 1940 | Shannon H. Heath | FRANKLIN TN, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 29% | 3,456 | |
| 1941 | Helen E. Hesse | ORANGE, CALast decision Sep 2017 | 29% | 441 | |
| 1942 | Paul Isherwood | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 29% | 3,097 | |
| 1943 | Henry Kramzyk | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 29% | 3,072 | |
| 1944 | Vincent A. Misenti | STOCKTON, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 29% | 3,502 | |
| 1945 | William Musseman | COLORADO SPRINGS, COLast decision Sep 2021 | 29% | 2,142 | |
| 1946 | Susan Poulos | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 29% | 3,342 | |
| 1947 | George D. Roscoe | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Sep 2022 | 29% | 2,047 | |
| 1948 | Timothy G. Stueve | TOPEKA KS, KSLast decision Sep 2020 | 29% | 1,161 | |
| 1949 | Gary J. Suttles | FRANKLIN TN, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 29% | 2,983 | |
| 1950 | Michelle Whetsel | HOUSTON WEST, TXLast decision Sep 2024 | 29% | 2,210 | |
| 1951 | Chris Yokus | OMAHA, NELast decision Jul 2026 | 29% | 2,833 | |
| 1952 | Gerald R. Bruce | SALT LAKE CITY, UTLast decision Jul 2026 | 28% | 3,820 | |
| 1953 | Felicia D. Burkes | HATTIESBURG, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 28% | 3,967 | |
| 1954 | Jeffry Gauthier | MILWAUKEE, WILast decision Sep 2019 | 28% | 1,140 | |
| 1955 | Robert T. Harvey | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2016 | 28% | 247 | |
| 1956 | Walter R. Hellums | SPRINGFIELD MO, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 28% | 3,635 | |
| 1957 | Bonnie Kittinger | LEXINGTON, KYLast decision Sep 2017 | 28% | 597 | |
| 1958 | Bruce W. MacKenzie | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2018 | 28% | 1,037 | |
| 1959 | Leslie Perry-Dowdell | PITTSBURGH, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 28% | 3,371 | |
| 1960 | L. D. Pischek | MOBILE, ALLast decision Sep 2018 | 28% | 1,135 | |
| 1961 | Randolph E. Schum | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Sep 2025 | 28% | 2,796 | |
| 1962 | Lanier Williams | HATTIESBURG, MSLast decision Sep 2025 | 28% | 2,964 | |
| 1963 | Michelle Wolfe | WILKES BARRE, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 28% | 3,738 | |
| 1964 | Melinda Yurich | SAN FRANCISCO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 28% | 898 | |
| 1965 | John Aletta | HARTFORD, CTLast decision Sep 2024 | 27% | 2,187 | |
| 1966 | Daniel Balutis | WILKES BARRE, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 27% | 3,301 | |
| 1967 | Gary Brockington | RALEIGH, NCLast decision Sep 2020 | 27% | 1,569 | |
| 1968 | Scott R. Canfield | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Sep 2019 | 27% | 1,056 | |
| 1969 | Thomas Cheffins | LITTLE ROCK, ARLast decision Jul 2026 | 27% | 4,801 | |
| 1970 | Deborah M. Giesen | ORLAND PARK, ILLast decision Sep 2025 | 27% | 2,763 | |
| 1971 | Victor L. Horton | SPRINGFIELD MO, MOLast decision Sep 2019 | 27% | 1,343 | |
| 1972 | Cecilia LaCara | SEATTLE, WALast decision Jul 2026 | 27% | 2,922 | |
| 1973 | Wayne L. Ritter | MILWAUKEE, WILast decision Sep 2022 | 27% | 1,966 | |
| 1974 | Mark M. Swayze | SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 27% | 3,781 | |
| 1975 | Michael D. Harbart | HATTIESBURG, MSLast decision Sep 2025 | 26% | 2,830 | |
| 1976 | Janet Hollings | ALEXANDRIA, LALast decision Nov 2017 | 26% | 167 | |
| 1977 | Brian P. Kilbane | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Sep 2018 | 26% | 655 | |
| 1978 | MaryAnn Lunderman | OAKLAND, CALast decision Sep 2025 | 26% | 2,215 | |
| 1979 | Thomas Merrill | MANCHESTER, NHLast decision Sep 2023 | 26% | 1,846 | |
| 1980 | Edward T. Morriss | CHARLESTON SC, SCLast decision Sep 2020 | 26% | 1,854 | |
| 1981 | Thomas J. Sanzi | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 26% | 2,906 | |
| 1982 | Sylvia H. Alonso | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Sep 2025 | 25% | 2,929 | |
| 1983 | David K. Fromme | SPRINGFIELD MO, MOLast decision Sep 2016 | 25% | 113 | |
| 1984 | Kathleen Kadlec | ORLAND PARK, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 25% | 2,996 | |
| 1985 | Laurie H. Porciello | HATTIESBURG, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 25% | 3,890 | |
| 1986 | Susanne M. Cichanowicz | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Sep 2023 | 24% | 1,672 | |
| 1987 | Barbara Powell | SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Sep 2020 | 24% | 1,508 | |
| 1988 | Ruth Ramsey | METAIRIE, LALast decision Sep 2019 | 24% | 622 | |
| 1989 | Michael D. Shilling | TOPEKA KS, KSLast decision Sep 2023 | 24% | 2,242 | |
| 1990 | Cynthia G. Weaver | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 24% | 2,459 | |
| 1991 | Brendan F. Flanagan | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Sep 2025 | 23% | 2,423 | |
| 1992 | Paul T. Hebda | ANCHORAGELast decision Sep 2020 | 23% | 1,145 | |
| 1993 | Sheila Walters | STOCKTON, CALast decision Sep 2018 | 23% | 862 | |
| 1994 | Peri Collins | DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TXLast decision Sep 2025 | 21% | 2,204 | |
| 1995 | Diane S. Davis | COLORADO SPRINGS, COLast decision Jul 2026 | 21% | 3,179 | |
| 1996 | Susan G. Giuffre | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Sep 2020 | 21% | 1,451 | |
| 1997 | Nikki Hall | MORGANTOWN, WVLast decision Sep 2021 | 21% | 1,765 | |
| 1998 | Valencia Jarvis | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 21% | 2,564 | |
| 1999 | Ronald M. Kayser | LEXINGTON, KYLast decision Sep 2017 | 21% | 382 | |
| 2000 | Walter V. Lassiter Jr. | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Sep 2017 | 21% | 341 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.