All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 20 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1901–2000 of 2044 judges
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
3,111
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
258
Office
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
1,716
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
647
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
1,248
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
3,409
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
815
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
3,901
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
3,962
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
1,800
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
194
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
3,162
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
4,165
Office
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
3,312
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
338
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
2,441
Office
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
1,603
Office
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
2,520
Office
Approval Rate
32%
Decisions
325
Approval Rate
31%
Decisions
1,768
Approval Rate
31%
Decisions
2,030
Approval Rate
31%
Decisions
3,076
Office
Approval Rate
31%
Decisions
4,051
Office
Approval Rate
31%
Decisions
936
Approval Rate
30%
Decisions
2,869
Approval Rate
30%
Decisions
213
Office
Approval Rate
30%
Decisions
3,441
Approval Rate
30%
Decisions
3,423
Office
Approval Rate
30%
Decisions
2,157
Office
Approval Rate
30%
Decisions
1,438
Approval Rate
30%
Decisions
196
Approval Rate
30%
Decisions
3,163
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
796
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
4,569
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
3,456
Office
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
441
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
3,097
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
3,072
Office
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
3,502
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
2,142
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
3,342
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
2,047
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
1,161
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
2,983
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
2,210
Office
Approval Rate
29%
Decisions
2,833
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
3,820
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
3,967
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
1,140
Office
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
247
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
3,635
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
597
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
1,037
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
3,371
Office
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
1,135
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
2,796
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
2,964
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
3,738
Approval Rate
28%
Decisions
898
Office
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
2,187
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
3,301
Office
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
1,569
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
1,056
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
4,801
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
2,763
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
1,343
Office
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
2,922
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
1,966
Approval Rate
27%
Decisions
3,781
Approval Rate
26%
Decisions
2,830
Approval Rate
26%
Decisions
167
Approval Rate
26%
Decisions
655
Office
Approval Rate
26%
Decisions
2,215
Approval Rate
26%
Decisions
1,846
Approval Rate
26%
Decisions
1,854
Approval Rate
26%
Decisions
2,906
Approval Rate
25%
Decisions
2,929
Approval Rate
25%
Decisions
113
Approval Rate
25%
Decisions
2,996
Approval Rate
25%
Decisions
3,890
Approval Rate
24%
Decisions
1,672
Approval Rate
24%
Decisions
1,508
Office
Approval Rate
24%
Decisions
622
Approval Rate
24%
Decisions
2,242
Approval Rate
24%
Decisions
2,459
Approval Rate
23%
Decisions
2,423
Office
ANCHORAGE
Approval Rate
23%
Decisions
1,145
Office
Approval Rate
23%
Decisions
862
Approval Rate
21%
Decisions
2,204
Approval Rate
21%
Decisions
3,179
Approval Rate
21%
Decisions
1,451
Approval Rate
21%
Decisions
1,765
Approval Rate
21%
Decisions
2,564
Approval Rate
21%
Decisions
382
Approval Rate
21%
Decisions
341
Office
Approval Rate
21%
Decisions
600
Office
Approval Rate
20%
Decisions
2,540
Approval Rate
20%
Decisions
3,913
Approval Rate
20%
Decisions
730
Approval Rate
20%
Decisions
1,672
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1901Michael A. Krasnow WASHINGTON, DC 33%3,111
1902Barbara C. Marquardt SAN ANTONIO, TX 33%258
1903Michael McKenna HARTFORD, CT 33%1,716
1904George A. Mills III MORGANTOWN, WV 33%647
1905Patrick H. Morrison SPRINGFIELD MO, MO 33%1,248
1906Steven M. Rachal ALEXANDRIA, LA 33%3,409
1907Roger W. Thomas MINNEAPOLIS, MN 33%815
1908Dante M. Alegre PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZ 32%3,901
1909Kevin Batik FORT WORTH, TX 32%3,962
1910Martha Bower PROVIDENCE, RI 32%1,800
1911Clark S. Cheney BALTIMORE, MD 32%194
1912Diana J. Coburn LONG BEACH, CA 32%3,162
1913Bradley L. Davis LITTLE ROCK, AR 32%4,165
1914Patrick R. Digby FLORENCE, AL 32%3,312
1915M. D. Evans FT LAUDERDALE, FL 32%338
1916John A. Fraser JOHNSTOWN, PA 32%2,441
1917Christopher R. Inama BILLINGS, MT 32%1,603
1918Michele M. Kelley BILLINGS, MT 32%2,520
1919Elizabeth C. Palacios MIAMI, FL 32%325
1920Renita K. Bivins CINCINNATI, OH 31%1,768
1921Michael Carr NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NM 31%2,030
1922Amber Downs TAMPA OHO, FL 31%3,076
1923Emily Y. Howard MACON, GA 31%4,051
1924Jamie Mendelson DENVER, CO 31%936
1925Paul R. Armstrong NHC CHICAGO, IL 30%2,869
1926Jonathan Eliot CLEVELAND, OH 30%213
1927Allen G. Erickson SEATTLE, WA 30%3,441
1928Joseph G. Hajjar CLEVELAND, OH 30%3,423
1929Katherine Jecklin ST LOUIS, MO 30%2,157
1930Rebecca L. Jones TACOMA, WA 30%1,438
1931Sean McKee MT PLEASANT MI, MI 30%196
1932Kathleen Winters TOLEDO OH, OH 30%3,163
1933Francine L. Applewhite NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 29%796
1934Richard E. Guida HARRISBURG, PA 29%4,569
1935Shannon H. Heath FRANKLIN TN, TN 29%3,456
1936Helen E. Hesse ORANGE, CA 29%441
1937Paul Isherwood DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 29%3,097
1938Henry Kramzyk NHC CHICAGO, IL 29%3,072
1939Vincent A. Misenti STOCKTON, CA 29%3,502
1940William Musseman COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 29%2,142
1941Susan Poulos CHARLOTTE, NC 29%3,342
1942George D. Roscoe CLEVELAND, OH 29%2,047
1943Timothy G. Stueve TOPEKA KS, KS 29%1,161
1944Gary J. Suttles FRANKLIN TN, TN 29%2,983
1945Michelle Whetsel HOUSTON WEST, TX 29%2,210
1946Chris Yokus OMAHA, NE 29%2,833
1947Gerald R. Bruce SALT LAKE CITY, UT 28%3,820
1948Felicia D. Burkes HATTIESBURG, MS 28%3,967
1949Jeffry Gauthier MILWAUKEE, WI 28%1,140
1950Robert T. Harvey BUFFALO, NY 28%247
1951Walter R. Hellums SPRINGFIELD MO, MO 28%3,635
1952Bonnie Kittinger LEXINGTON, KY 28%597
1953Bruce W. MacKenzie BIRMINGHAM, AL 28%1,037
1954Leslie Perry-Dowdell PITTSBURGH, PA 28%3,371
1955L. D. Pischek MOBILE, AL 28%1,135
1956Randolph E. Schum PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 28%2,796
1957Lanier Williams HATTIESBURG, MS 28%2,964
1958Michelle Wolfe WILKES BARRE, PA 28%3,738
1959Melinda Yurich SAN FRANCISCO, CA 28%898
1960John Aletta HARTFORD, CT 27%2,187
1961Daniel Balutis WILKES BARRE, PA 27%3,301
1962Gary Brockington RALEIGH, NC 27%1,569
1963Scott R. Canfield CLEVELAND, OH 27%1,056
1964Thomas Cheffins LITTLE ROCK, AR 27%4,801
1965Deborah M. Giesen ORLAND PARK, IL 27%2,763
1966Victor L. Horton SPRINGFIELD MO, MO 27%1,343
1967Cecilia LaCara SEATTLE, WA 27%2,922
1968Wayne L. Ritter MILWAUKEE, WI 27%1,966
1969Mark M. Swayze SAN ANTONIO, TX 27%3,781
1970Michael D. Harbart HATTIESBURG, MS 26%2,830
1971Janet Hollings ALEXANDRIA, LA 26%167
1972Brian P. Kilbane CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 26%655
1973MaryAnn Lunderman OAKLAND, CA 26%2,215
1974Thomas Merrill MANCHESTER, NH 26%1,846
1975Edward T. Morriss CHARLESTON SC, SC 26%1,854
1976Thomas J. Sanzi MINNEAPOLIS, MN 26%2,906
1977Sylvia H. Alonso FT LAUDERDALE, FL 25%2,929
1978David K. Fromme SPRINGFIELD MO, MO 25%113
1979Kathleen Kadlec ORLAND PARK, IL 25%2,996
1980Laurie H. Porciello HATTIESBURG, MS 25%3,890
1981Susanne M. Cichanowicz DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 24%1,672
1982Barbara Powell SAN ANTONIO, TX 24%1,508
1983Ruth Ramsey METAIRIE, LA 24%622
1984Michael D. Shilling TOPEKA KS, KS 24%2,242
1985Cynthia G. Weaver ATLANTA NORTH, GA 24%2,459
1986Brendan F. Flanagan ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 23%2,423
1987Paul T. Hebda ANCHORAGE 23%1,145
1988Sheila Walters STOCKTON, CA 23%862
1989Peri Collins DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TX 21%2,204
1990Diane S. Davis COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 21%3,179
1991Susan G. Giuffre CLEVELAND, OH 21%1,451
1992Nikki Hall MORGANTOWN, WV 21%1,765
1993Valencia Jarvis FT LAUDERDALE, FL 21%2,564
1994Ronald M. Kayser LEXINGTON, KY 21%382
1995Walter V. Lassiter Jr. MONTGOMERY, AL 21%341
1996Tom L. Morris SEATTLE, WA 21%600
1997Peter R. Lee NEWARK, NJ 20%2,540
1998Gordan Momcilovic SAN ANTONIO, TX 20%3,913
1999Mark A. O'Hara CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 20%730
2000Susan Whittington SAN ANTONIO, TX 20%1,672

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).