Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1801 | Peter Beekman | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Sep 2023 | 38% | 2,838 | |
| 1802 | W. Thomas Bundy | SHREVEPORT, LALast decision Sep 2017 | 38% | 414 | |
| 1803 | Loranzo Fleming | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2019 | 38% | 596 | |
| 1804 | Gregory J. Froehlich | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 38% | 3,674 | |
| 1805 | Julia D. Gibbs | NHC FALLS CHURCH, DCLast decision Sep 2017 | 38% | 595 | |
| 1806 | Joan G. Knight | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Sep 2017 | 38% | 601 | |
| 1807 | Mary J. Leary | SPRINGFIELD MO, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 38% | 2,974 | |
| 1808 | Lantz McClain | TULSA, OKLast decision Sep 2020 | 38% | 2,392 | |
| 1809 | Jerry Meade | HUNTINGTON WV, WVLast decision Jul 2026 | 38% | 3,094 | |
| 1810 | George W. Merchant | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 38% | 4,160 | |
| 1811 | Glenn G. Meyers | SEATTLE, WALast decision Sep 2024 | 38% | 2,310 | |
| 1812 | Jeffery D. Morgan | NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 38% | 3,415 | |
| 1813 | H. Munday | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Jul 2026 | 38% | 3,645 | |
| 1814 | Cam Oetter | MACON, GALast decision Feb 2024 | 38% | 2,719 | |
| 1815 | Sung Park | LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 38% | 3,056 | |
| 1816 | Sujata Rodgers | BOSTON, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 38% | 3,343 | |
| 1817 | Andrew Verne | SAN DIEGO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 38% | 3,595 | |
| 1818 | Paul Wood | LITTLE ROCK, ARLast decision Jul 2026 | 38% | 3,402 | |
| 1819 | Sarah Zimmerman | PORTLAND ME, MELast decision Sep 2023 | 38% | 1,452 | |
| 1820 | Sheldon P. Zisook | PHOENIX, AZLast decision Sep 2020 | 38% | 2,107 | |
| 1821 | John W. Belcher | TULSA, OKLast decision Sep 2018 | 37% | 806 | |
| 1822 | George M. Bock | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Sep 2017 | 37% | 821 | |
| 1823 | Robert B. Bowling | LEXINGTON, KYLast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 2,858 | |
| 1824 | Michael D. Burrichter | TOPEKA KS, KSLast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 3,607 | |
| 1825 | James Delphey | SAN DIEGO, CALast decision Sep 2025 | 37% | 2,299 | |
| 1826 | Kurt G. Ehrman | ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FLLast decision Sep 2024 | 37% | 3,224 | |
| 1827 | Kim A. Fields | DES MOINES, IALast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 4,262 | |
| 1828 | James F. Gillet | SPRINGFIELD MO, MOLast decision Sep 2024 | 37% | 2,017 | |
| 1829 | James Harty | WICHITA, KSLast decision Sep 2016 | 37% | 251 | |
| 1830 | Patricia C. Henry | HOUSTON NORTH, TXLast decision Sep 2018 | 37% | 707 | |
| 1831 | Paul W. Jones | LANSING, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 4,396 | |
| 1832 | Ward D. King | FORT WORTH, TXLast decision Sep 2019 | 37% | 1,394 | |
| 1833 | William A. Kurlander | RENO, NVLast decision Sep 2021 | 37% | 1,689 | |
| 1834 | Martin McClelland | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Sep 2019 | 37% | 509 | |
| 1835 | Gregory Moldafsky | NHC FALLS CHURCH, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 2,419 | |
| 1836 | Angela L. Neel | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 4,779 | |
| 1837 | Thuy-Anh T. Nguyen | CINCINNATI, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 3,368 | |
| 1838 | George Oetter | MACON, GALast decision Sep 2025 | 37% | 540 | |
| 1839 | Marjorie Panter | FORT WORTH, TXLast decision Sep 2025 | 37% | 3,409 | |
| 1840 | Randy Riley | HARRISBURG, PALast decision Sep 2024 | 37% | 2,986 | |
| 1841 | Barry Robinson | NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NMLast decision Sep 2019 | 37% | 587 | |
| 1842 | Erin T. Schmidt | DES MOINES, IALast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 2,847 | |
| 1843 | Sean Teehan | BOSTON, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 2,924 | |
| 1844 | Susan Toth | WICHITA, KSLast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 3,116 | |
| 1845 | Amy Uren Roberson | MACON, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 37% | 1,253 | |
| 1846 | Kevin T. Alexander | LITTLE ROCK, ARLast decision Jul 2026 | 36% | 3,895 | |
| 1847 | Paula F. Atchison | PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZLast decision Sep 2024 | 36% | 1,884 | |
| 1848 | Patricia A. Bucci | PHOENIX NORTH, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 36% | 2,945 | |
| 1849 | Geoffrey S. Casher | SAVANNAH, GALast decision Sep 2022 | 36% | 2,651 | |
| 1850 | Donald R. Davis | DALLAS NORTH, TXLast decision Sep 2018 | 36% | 1,114 | |
| 1851 | Paula Fow Atchison | PHOENIX, AZLast decision May 2017 | 36% | 140 | |
| 1852 | Doug Gabbard II | MCALESTERLast decision Sep 2024 | 36% | 3,181 | |
| 1853 | Gerald J. Hill | TACOMA, WALast decision Sep 2019 | 36% | 711 | |
| 1854 | Cynthia R. Hoover | LAS VEGAS, NVLast decision Jul 2026 | 36% | 4,056 | |
| 1855 | Larry Kennedy | SEATTLE, WALast decision Sep 2019 | 36% | 1,108 | |
| 1856 | Roy E. LaRoche Jr. | OAK PARK, MILast decision Sep 2025 | 36% | 3,116 | |
| 1857 | Lisa Leslie | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 36% | 3,377 | |
| 1858 | Sharon L. Madsen | FRESNO, CALast decision Sep 2019 | 36% | 1,139 | |
| 1859 | Christina Young Mein | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 36% | 3,891 | |
| 1860 | John Michaelsen | PORTLAND OR, ORLast decision Sep 2022 | 36% | 2,343 | |
| 1861 | John T. Molleur | NEW HAVEN, CTLast decision Jul 2026 | 36% | 2,225 | |
| 1862 | Mark Solomon | NEW YORK, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 36% | 3,209 | |
| 1863 | David W. Thompson | SALT LAKE CITY, UTLast decision Jul 2026 | 36% | 4,379 | |
| 1864 | Mark A. Clayton | SPRINGFIELD MO, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 35% | 3,444 | |
| 1865 | Arline Colon | ST PETERSBURG FL, FLLast decision Sep 2019 | 35% | 1,036 | |
| 1866 | Laura Fernandez | SANTA BARBARA, CALast decision Sep 2023 | 35% | 2,489 | |
| 1867 | Dale D. Glendening Jr. | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Sep 2016 | 35% | 121 | |
| 1868 | Scot Gulick | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Sep 2025 | 35% | 3,063 | |
| 1869 | Scott Johnson | TOPEKA KS, KSLast decision Jul 2026 | 35% | 3,844 | |
| 1870 | Penny Loucas | CLEVELAND, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 35% | 3,126 | |
| 1871 | Robert V. Luetkenhaus | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 35% | 3,106 | |
| 1872 | Joel B. Martinez | PASADENA, CALast decision Sep 2016 | 35% | 111 | |
| 1873 | Lawrence T. Ragona | ALEXANDRIA, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 35% | 3,616 | |
| 1874 | Mark Schafer | LITTLE ROCK, ARLast decision Jul 2026 | 35% | 4,405 | |
| 1875 | William Sharp | HOUSTON NORTH, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 35% | 4,089 | |
| 1876 | Ilene Sloan | SEATTLE, WALast decision Sep 2019 | 35% | 672 | |
| 1877 | Edward P. Studzinski | OAK BROOK, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 35% | 4,649 | |
| 1878 | John D. Thompson Jr. | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Sep 2023 | 35% | 1,079 | |
| 1879 | Gregory M. Wilson | GREENVILLE, SCLast decision Sep 2023 | 35% | 2,011 | |
| 1880 | Mark C. Ziercher | FAYETTEVILLE NC, NCLast decision Sep 2019 | 35% | 809 | |
| 1881 | Janice E. Barnes-Williams | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 34% | 3,031 | |
| 1882 | Robert L. Bartelt Jr. | MILWAUKEE, WILast decision Sep 2016 | 34% | 104 | |
| 1883 | Deborah E. Ellis | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 34% | 3,137 | |
| 1884 | Rita S. Eppler | COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Sep 2019 | 34% | 148 | |
| 1885 | Michael Gilbert | TACOMA, WALast decision Sep 2017 | 34% | 262 | |
| 1886 | Lynette Gohr | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2019 | 34% | 882 | |
| 1887 | Patricia E. Hurt | RICHMOND, VALast decision Sep 2016 | 34% | 167 | |
| 1888 | Kelly Matthews | HOUSTON WEST, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 34% | 3,382 | |
| 1889 | Koren Mueller | ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Sep 2025 | 34% | 2,572 | |
| 1890 | Toni Neal | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 34% | 306 | |
| 1891 | Don C. Paris | LEXINGTON, KYLast decision Sep 2017 | 34% | 243 | |
| 1892 | Cynthia D. Rosa | PORTLAND OR, ORLast decision Sep 2022 | 34% | 2,083 | |
| 1893 | Shannon H. Smith | FRANKLIN TN, TNLast decision May 2016 | 34% | 235 | |
| 1894 | Alisa M. Tapia | TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FLLast decision Sep 2021 | 34% | 1,138 | |
| 1895 | Gary L. Vanderhoof | LAS VEGAS, NVLast decision Sep 2018 | 34% | 1,140 | |
| 1896 | Glen H. Watkins | TAMPA OHO, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 34% | 4,120 | |
| 1897 | Daniel E. Whitney | HOUSTON NORTH, TXLast decision Sep 2024 | 34% | 3,766 | |
| 1898 | Janet Akers | ORLAND PARK, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 33% | 1,953 | |
| 1899 | William Callahan | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 33% | 2,990 | |
| 1900 | Daniel F. Cusick | SEVEN FIELDS, PALast decision Sep 2019 | 33% | 1,090 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.