All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 19 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1801–1900 of 2044 judges
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
601
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
2,974
Office
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
2,392
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
3,094
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
4,160
Office
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
2,310
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
3,415
1808 H. Munday
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
3,645
Office
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
2,719
1810 Sung Park
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
3,056
Office
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
3,343
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
3,595
1813 Paul Wood
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
3,402
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
1,452
Office
Approval Rate
38%
Decisions
2,107
Office
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
806
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
821
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
2,858
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
3,607
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
2,299
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
3,224
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
4,262
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
2,017
Office
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
251
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
707
Office
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
4,396
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
1,394
Office
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
1,689
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
509
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
2,217
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
4,779
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
3,368
Office
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
540
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
3,409
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
2,986
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
587
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
2,847
Office
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
2,924
Office
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
3,116
Office
Approval Rate
37%
Decisions
1,253
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
3,895
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
1,884
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
2,945
Office
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
2,651
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
1,114
Office
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
140
Office
MCALESTER
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
3,181
Office
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
711
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
4,056
Office
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
1,108
Office
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
3,116
Office
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
3,377
Office
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
1,139
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
3,891
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
2,343
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
2,225
Office
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
3,209
Approval Rate
36%
Decisions
4,379
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
3,444
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
1,036
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
2,489
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
121
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
3,063
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
3,844
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
3,126
Office
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
3,106
Office
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
111
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
3,616
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
4,405
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
4,089
Office
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
672
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
4,649
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
1,079
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
2,011
Approval Rate
35%
Decisions
809
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
3,031
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
104
Office
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
3,137
Office
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
148
Office
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
262
Office
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
882
Office
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
167
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
3,382
Office
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
2,572
1885 Toni Neal
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
306
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
243
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
2,083
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
235
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
1,138
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
1,140
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
4,120
Approval Rate
34%
Decisions
3,766
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
1,953
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
2,990
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
1,090
Office
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
2,543
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
3,180
Office
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
490
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
2,203
Approval Rate
33%
Decisions
3,663
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1801Joan G. Knight PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 38%601
1802Mary J. Leary SPRINGFIELD MO, MO 38%2,974
1803Lantz McClain TULSA, OK 38%2,392
1804Jerry Meade HUNTINGTON WV, WV 38%3,094
1805George W. Merchant BIRMINGHAM, AL 38%4,160
1806Glenn G. Meyers SEATTLE, WA 38%2,310
1807Jeffery D. Morgan NEW ORLEANS, LA 38%3,415
1808H. Munday CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 38%3,645
1809Cam Oetter MACON, GA 38%2,719
1810Sung Park LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN, CA 38%3,056
1811Sujata Rodgers BOSTON, MA 38%3,343
1812Andrew Verne SAN DIEGO, CA 38%3,595
1813Paul Wood LITTLE ROCK, AR 38%3,402
1814Sarah Zimmerman PORTLAND ME, ME 38%1,452
1815Sheldon P. Zisook PHOENIX, AZ 38%2,107
1816John W. Belcher TULSA, OK 37%806
1817George M. Bock KANSAS CITY, MO 37%821
1818Robert B. Bowling LEXINGTON, KY 37%2,858
1819Michael D. Burrichter TOPEKA KS, KS 37%3,607
1820James Delphey SAN DIEGO, CA 37%2,299
1821Kurt G. Ehrman ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 37%3,224
1822Kim A. Fields DES MOINES, IA 37%4,262
1823James F. Gillet SPRINGFIELD MO, MO 37%2,017
1824James Harty WICHITA, KS 37%251
1825Patricia C. Henry HOUSTON NORTH, TX 37%707
1826Paul W. Jones LANSING, MI 37%4,396
1827Ward D. King FORT WORTH, TX 37%1,394
1828William A. Kurlander RENO, NV 37%1,689
1829Martin McClelland CLEVELAND, OH 37%509
1830Gregory Moldafsky WASHINGTON, DC 37%2,217
1831Angela L. Neel FT LAUDERDALE, FL 37%4,779
1832Thuy-Anh T. Nguyen CINCINNATI, OH 37%3,368
1833George Oetter MACON, GA 37%540
1834Marjorie Panter FORT WORTH, TX 37%3,409
1835Randy Riley HARRISBURG, PA 37%2,986
1836Barry Robinson NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NM 37%587
1837Erin T. Schmidt DES MOINES, IA 37%2,847
1838Sean Teehan BOSTON, MA 37%2,924
1839Susan Toth WICHITA, KS 37%3,116
1840Amy Uren Roberson MACON, GA 37%1,253
1841Kevin T. Alexander LITTLE ROCK, AR 36%3,895
1842Paula F. Atchison PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZ 36%1,884
1843Patricia A. Bucci PHOENIX NORTH, AZ 36%2,945
1844Geoffrey S. Casher SAVANNAH, GA 36%2,651
1845Donald R. Davis DALLAS NORTH, TX 36%1,114
1846Paula Fow Atchison PHOENIX, AZ 36%140
1847Doug Gabbard II MCALESTER 36%3,181
1848Gerald J. Hill TACOMA, WA 36%711
1849Cynthia R. Hoover LAS VEGAS, NV 36%4,056
1850Larry Kennedy SEATTLE, WA 36%1,108
1851Roy E. LaRoche Jr. OAK PARK, MI 36%3,116
1852Lisa Leslie ST LOUIS, MO 36%3,377
1853Sharon L. Madsen FRESNO, CA 36%1,139
1854Christina Young Mein KANSAS CITY, MO 36%3,891
1855John Michaelsen PORTLAND OR, OR 36%2,343
1856John T. Molleur NEW HAVEN, CT 36%2,225
1857Mark Solomon NEW YORK, NY 36%3,209
1858David W. Thompson SALT LAKE CITY, UT 36%4,379
1859Mark A. Clayton SPRINGFIELD MO, MO 35%3,444
1860Arline Colon ST PETERSBURG FL, FL 35%1,036
1861Laura Fernandez SANTA BARBARA, CA 35%2,489
1862Dale D. Glendening Jr. ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 35%121
1863Scot Gulick KANSAS CITY, MO 35%3,063
1864Scott Johnson TOPEKA KS, KS 35%3,844
1865Penny Loucas CLEVELAND, OH 35%3,126
1866Robert V. Luetkenhaus ST LOUIS, MO 35%3,106
1867Joel B. Martinez PASADENA, CA 35%111
1868Lawrence T. Ragona ALEXANDRIA, LA 35%3,616
1869Mark Schafer LITTLE ROCK, AR 35%4,405
1870William Sharp HOUSTON NORTH, TX 35%4,089
1871Ilene Sloan SEATTLE, WA 35%672
1872Edward P. Studzinski OAK BROOK, IL 35%4,649
1873John D. Thompson Jr. JACKSONVILLE, FL 35%1,079
1874Gregory M. Wilson GREENVILLE, SC 35%2,011
1875Mark C. Ziercher FAYETTEVILLE NC, NC 35%809
1876Janice E. Barnes-Williams KANSAS CITY, MO 34%3,031
1877Robert L. Bartelt Jr. MILWAUKEE, WI 34%104
1878Deborah E. Ellis ORLANDO, FL 34%3,137
1879Rita S. Eppler COLUMBUS, OH 34%148
1880Michael Gilbert TACOMA, WA 34%262
1881Lynette Gohr BUFFALO, NY 34%882
1882Patricia E. Hurt RICHMOND, VA 34%167
1883Kelly Matthews HOUSTON WEST, TX 34%3,382
1884Koren Mueller ST LOUIS, MO 34%2,572
1885Toni Neal KANSAS CITY, MO 34%306
1886Don C. Paris LEXINGTON, KY 34%243
1887Cynthia D. Rosa PORTLAND OR, OR 34%2,083
1888Shannon H. Smith FRANKLIN TN, TN 34%235
1889Alisa M. Tapia TALLAHASSEE FL OHO, FL 34%1,138
1890Gary L. Vanderhoof LAS VEGAS, NV 34%1,140
1891Glen H. Watkins TAMPA OHO, FL 34%4,120
1892Daniel E. Whitney HOUSTON NORTH, TX 34%3,766
1893Janet Akers ORLAND PARK, IL 33%1,953
1894William Callahan ATLANTA NORTH, GA 33%2,990
1895Daniel F. Cusick SEVEN FIELDS, PA 33%1,090
1896Jo Ann L. Draper TUPELO, MS 33%2,543
1897Richard Furcolo JACKSONVILLE, FL 33%3,180
1898Lloyd E. Hartford BILLINGS, MT 33%490
1899Marc Jones SAN ANTONIO, TX 33%2,203
1900Robert A. Kelly KANSAS CITY, MO 33%3,663

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).