All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts (Page 17 of 21)

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1601–1700 of 2044 judges
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,122
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
253
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
4,176
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
1,951
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
1,911
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,274
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,370
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,577
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
1,866
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,962
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,427
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
365
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
1,955
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,208
1615 Paula Fow
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
289
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
1,061
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,503
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
1,584
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
2,334
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
1,889
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
2,259
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
527
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,582
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
2,491
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
1,255
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
4,156
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
432
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,495
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,574
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
2,881
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,788
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,012
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
4,339
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
4,496
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
410
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
4,053
1637 Paul Sher
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,418
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
2,723
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
5,696
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
2,892
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
4,323
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
3,449
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
1,272
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
2,818
Office
Approval Rate
44%
Decisions
760
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
1,193
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
260
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
790
Office
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
2,338
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
4,137
Office
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
2,354
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
2,133
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
1,565
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
2,539
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,287
Office
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,774
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,526
Office
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
1,235
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,407
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
688
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,143
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
648
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
2,568
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
256
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
1,653
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,849
Office
WHITE PLAINS
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
2,300
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,525
Office
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,053
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,290
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
2,572
Office
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
615
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,424
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
443
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
2,382
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,414
Office
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,581
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
422
Approval Rate
43%
Decisions
3,159
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,438
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
901
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,762
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,393
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,688
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
1,438
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,492
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,509
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
1,829
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,399
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
1,551
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,455
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
1,859
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
1,233
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,137
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,375
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,660
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,487
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
3,763
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
2,965
Office
Approval Rate
42%
Decisions
1,435
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1601Robin J. Barber KINGSPORT, TN 44%3,122
1602William Barto CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 44%253
1603Gregory M. Beatty AKRON OH, OH 44%4,176
1604Barry H. Best PROVIDENCE, RI 44%1,951
1605Mary Brennan FT LAUDERDALE, FL 44%1,911
1606Lauren G. Burstein LIVONIA MI, MI 44%3,274
1607Margaret A. Carey CHICAGO, IL 44%3,370
1608Michael Comisky KANSAS CITY, MO 44%3,577
1609John Cusker LAS VEGAS, NV 44%1,866
1610Joan H. Deans KANSAS CITY, MO 44%3,962
1611Richard M. Exnicios METAIRIE, LA 44%3,427
1612Ronald J. Feibus CHATTANOOGA, TN 44%365
1613Elias Feuer BRONX, NY 44%1,955
1614Gregory Fons ATLANTA NORTH, GA 44%3,208
1615Paula Fow PHOENIX, AZ 44%289
1616Leetra J. Harris MEMPHIS, TN 44%1,061
1617Michael S. Hertzig METAIRIE, LA 44%3,503
1618Richard Horowitz TOLEDO OH, OH 44%1,584
1619Lloyd E. Hubler III CINCINNATI, OH 44%2,334
1620Timothy G. Keller COLUMBUS, OH 44%1,889
1621Michael A. Kilroy BILLINGS, MT 44%2,259
1622Mary M. Kunz MINNEAPOLIS, MN 44%527
1623Matthew G. Levin MANCHESTER, NH 44%3,582
1624Dina R. Loewy JERSEY CITY, NJ 44%2,491
1625Gilbert A. Martinez SALT LAKE CITY, UT 44%1,255
1626Jason Mastrangelo PROVIDENCE, RI 44%4,156
1627James R. McHenry III NHC BALTIMORE, MD 44%432
1628Mary D. Morrow DETROIT, MI 44%3,495
1629Margaret J. O'Grady MILWAUKEE, WI 44%3,574
1630Jerry W. Peace GREENVILLE, SC 44%2,881
1631Bernard Porter JACKSONVILLE, FL 44%3,788
1632Mary Ann Poulose CHICAGO, IL 44%3,012
1633Michael D. Radensky ORANGE, CA 44%4,339
1634Brian B. Rippel CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 44%4,496
1635James Satterwhite NHC ST LOUIS, MO 44%410
1636Karen Sayon ORLAND PARK, IL 44%4,053
1637Paul Sher TOLEDO OH, OH 44%3,418
1638Brian M. Steger ST LOUIS, MO 44%2,723
1639Ross Stubblefield HOUSTON NORTH, TX 44%5,696
1640Ronald Sweeda CHARLESTON SC, SC 44%2,892
1641Kenneth Theurer SYRACUSE, NY 44%4,323
1642Christopher S. Tindale CINCINNATI, OH 44%3,449
1643Lauren K. Tran TOPEKA KS, KS 44%1,272
1644Nycole Watson PHILADELPHIA EAST, PA 44%2,818
1645Wallace E. Weakley TAMPA, FL 44%760
1646Kyle C. Alexander ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 43%1,193
1647Stewart Alford MINNEAPOLIS, MN 43%260
1648John R. Allen NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 43%790
1649Angela Banks BRONX, NY 43%2,338
1650Charles L. Brower SAN ANTONIO, TX 43%4,137
1651John Carlton BRONX, NY 43%2,354
1652Louis M. Catanese NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NM 43%2,133
1653Jeffrey S. Ciegel INDIANAPOLIS, IN 43%1,565
1654Michael S. Condon GRAND RAPIDS, MI 43%2,539
1655Robert Droker JACKSONVILLE, FL 43%3,287
1656Edward E. Evans WICHITA, KS 43%3,774
1657Michael E. Finnie FRANKLIN TN, TN 43%3,526
1658James D. Goodman PASADENA, CA 43%1,235
1659William C. Grayson HATTIESBURG, MS 43%3,407
1660William H. Helsper FORT WORTH, TX 43%688
1661Thomas G. Henderson NEW ORLEANS, LA 43%3,143
1662Gwen Hurley ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 43%648
1663Paul Kovac PITTSBURGH, PA 43%2,568
1664Suzanne Krolikowski SAN RAFAEL, CA 43%256
1665Charles R. Lindsay SHREVEPORT, LA 43%1,653
1666Michael Mannes TULSA OHO, OK 43%3,849
1667Lau Michalec Olszewski WHITE PLAINS 43%2,300
1668Livia Morales VALPARAISO IN, IN 43%3,525
1669Jason Panek AKRON OH, OH 43%3,053
1670Sally C. Reason LOS ANGELES WEST, CA 43%3,290
1671Ronald Reeves BIRMINGHAM, AL 43%2,572
1672Sharon Seeley BUFFALO, NY 43%615
1673Carolyn Smilie ALEXANDRIA, LA 43%3,424
1674Kimberly Sorg-Graves INDIANAPOLIS, IN 43%443
1675Dean Syrjanen MILWAUKEE, WI 43%2,382
1676Robert J. Tjapkes GRAND RAPIDS, MI 43%3,414
1677Mark Triplett TACOMA, WA 43%3,581
1678Mary F. Withum NHC CHICAGO, IL 43%422
1679Charlotte A. Wright SHREVEPORT, LA 43%3,159
1680Brian Battles KINGSPORT, TN 42%2,438
1681Young L. Bechtold STOCKTON, CA 42%901
1682Caroline H. Beers HOUSTON WEST, TX 42%3,762
1683David J. Begley WASHINGTON, DC 42%3,393
1684Vincent Bennett HOUSTON WEST, TX 42%2,688
1685Kimberly Boyce SEATTLE, WA 42%1,438
1686Brian Burgtorf LANSING, MI 42%2,492
1687Matthew C. Dawson OMAHA, NE 42%2,509
1688Joseph F. Dent ST PETERSBURG FL, FL 42%1,829
1689Jeffrey L. Eastham LEXINGTON, KY 42%2,399
1690Kathleen H. Eiler ORLANDO, FL 42%1,551
1691Kevin W. Fallis FLINT, MI 42%3,455
1692Deborah Foresman RICHMOND, VA 42%1,859
1693Timothy Gates COLUMBUS, OH 42%1,233
1694Lori S. Grayson HATTIESBURG, MS 42%3,137
1695Kim K. Griswold SPRINGFIELD MA, MA 42%3,375
1696Renee B. Hagler BIRMINGHAM, AL 42%2,660
1697Bryan Henry COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 42%3,487
1698Janice L. Holmes SAN ANTONIO, TX 42%3,763
1699Julianne Hostovich PITTSBURGH, PA 42%2,965
1700Kelly Humphrey OMAHA, NE 42%1,435

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).