Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1601 | Carla L. Waters | PHOENIX DOWNTOWN, AZLast decision Jul 2026 | 45% | 3,987 | |
| 1602 | Elizabeth Watson | MORENO VALLEY, CALast decision Sep 2025 | 45% | 3,436 | |
| 1603 | William M. Weir | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 45% | 3,229 | |
| 1604 | Crystal L. White-Simmons | DETROIT, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 45% | 3,603 | |
| 1605 | Arthur Zeidman | LAS VEGAS, NVLast decision Sep 2025 | 45% | 2,893 | |
| 1606 | Stacy Appleton | MIDDLESBORO, KYLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 1,347 | |
| 1607 | Robin J. Barber | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,122 | |
| 1608 | William Barto | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Sep 2016 | 44% | 253 | |
| 1609 | Gregory M. Beatty | AKRON OH, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 4,176 | |
| 1610 | Barry H. Best | PROVIDENCE, RILast decision Sep 2021 | 44% | 1,951 | |
| 1611 | Mary Brennan | FT LAUDERDALE, FLLast decision Sep 2021 | 44% | 1,911 | |
| 1612 | Lauren G. Burstein | LIVONIA MI, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,274 | |
| 1613 | Margaret A. Carey | CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,370 | |
| 1614 | Michael Comisky | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,577 | |
| 1615 | John Cusker | LAS VEGAS, NVLast decision Sep 2022 | 44% | 1,866 | |
| 1616 | Joan H. Deans | KANSAS CITY, MOLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,962 | |
| 1617 | Richard M. Exnicios | METAIRIE, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,427 | |
| 1618 | Ronald J. Feibus | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Sep 2017 | 44% | 365 | |
| 1619 | Elias Feuer | BRONX, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 44% | 1,955 | |
| 1620 | Gregory Fons | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,208 | |
| 1621 | Paula Fow | PHOENIX, AZLast decision Dec 2016 | 44% | 289 | |
| 1622 | Leetra J. Harris | MEMPHIS, TNLast decision Sep 2019 | 44% | 1,061 | |
| 1623 | Michael S. Hertzig | METAIRIE, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,503 | |
| 1624 | Richard Horowitz | TOLEDO OH, OHLast decision Sep 2019 | 44% | 1,584 | |
| 1625 | Lloyd E. Hubler III | CINCINNATI, OHLast decision Jul 2022 | 44% | 2,334 | |
| 1626 | Timothy G. Keller | COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Sep 2022 | 44% | 1,889 | |
| 1627 | Michael A. Kilroy | BILLINGS, MTLast decision Sep 2023 | 44% | 2,259 | |
| 1628 | Mary M. Kunz | MINNEAPOLIS, MNLast decision Sep 2017 | 44% | 527 | |
| 1629 | Matthew G. Levin | MANCHESTER, NHLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,582 | |
| 1630 | Dina R. Loewy | JERSEY CITY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 2,491 | |
| 1631 | Gilbert A. Martinez | SALT LAKE CITY, UTLast decision Sep 2019 | 44% | 1,255 | |
| 1632 | Jason Mastrangelo | PROVIDENCE, RILast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 4,156 | |
| 1633 | James R. McHenry III | NHC BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2017 | 44% | 432 | |
| 1634 | Mary D. Morrow | DETROIT, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,495 | |
| 1635 | Margaret J. O'Grady | MILWAUKEE, WILast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,574 | |
| 1636 | Jerry W. Peace | GREENVILLE, SCLast decision Sep 2025 | 44% | 2,881 | |
| 1637 | Bernard Porter | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,788 | |
| 1638 | Mary Ann Poulose | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,012 | |
| 1639 | Michael D. Radensky | ORANGE, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 4,339 | |
| 1640 | Brian B. Rippel | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 4,496 | |
| 1641 | James Satterwhite | NHC ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Sep 2019 | 44% | 410 | |
| 1642 | Karen Sayon | ORLAND PARK, ILLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 4,053 | |
| 1643 | Paul Sher | TOLEDO OH, OHLast decision Sep 2025 | 44% | 3,418 | |
| 1644 | Ross Stubblefield | HOUSTON NORTH, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 5,696 | |
| 1645 | Ronald Sweeda | CHARLESTON SC, SCLast decision Sep 2023 | 44% | 2,892 | |
| 1646 | Kenneth Theurer | SYRACUSE, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 4,323 | |
| 1647 | Christopher S. Tindale | CINCINNATI, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 3,449 | |
| 1648 | Lauren K. Tran | TOPEKA KS, KSLast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 1,272 | |
| 1649 | Nycole Watson | PHILADELPHIA EAST, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 44% | 2,818 | |
| 1650 | Wallace E. Weakley | TAMPA, FLLast decision Sep 2018 | 44% | 760 | |
| 1651 | Kyle C. Alexander | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Sep 2019 | 43% | 1,193 | |
| 1652 | Stewart Alford | MINNEAPOLIS, MNLast decision Sep 2019 | 43% | 260 | |
| 1653 | John R. Allen | NHC FALLS CHURCH, DCLast decision Sep 2020 | 43% | 790 | |
| 1654 | Angela Banks | BRONX, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 2,338 | |
| 1655 | Charles L. Brower | SAN ANTONIO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 4,137 | |
| 1656 | John Carlton | BRONX, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 2,354 | |
| 1657 | Louis M. Catanese | NHC ALBUQUERQUE, NMLast decision Sep 2021 | 43% | 2,133 | |
| 1658 | Jeffrey S. Ciegel | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 1,565 | |
| 1659 | Michael S. Condon | GRAND RAPIDS, MILast decision Sep 2022 | 43% | 2,539 | |
| 1660 | Robert Droker | JACKSONVILLE, FLLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,287 | |
| 1661 | Edward E. Evans | WICHITA, KSLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,774 | |
| 1662 | Michael E. Finnie | FRANKLIN TN, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,526 | |
| 1663 | James D. Goodman | PASADENA, CALast decision Sep 2020 | 43% | 1,235 | |
| 1664 | William C. Grayson | HATTIESBURG, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,407 | |
| 1665 | William H. Helsper | FORT WORTH, TXLast decision Sep 2017 | 43% | 688 | |
| 1666 | Thomas G. Henderson | NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Sep 2024 | 43% | 3,143 | |
| 1667 | Gwen Hurley | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Sep 2019 | 43% | 648 | |
| 1668 | Paul Kovac | PITTSBURGH, PALast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 2,568 | |
| 1669 | Suzanne Krolikowski | SAN RAFAEL, CALast decision Sep 2017 | 43% | 256 | |
| 1670 | Charles R. Lindsay | SHREVEPORT, LALast decision Sep 2019 | 43% | 1,653 | |
| 1671 | Michael Mannes | TULSA OHO, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,849 | |
| 1672 | Lau Michalec Olszewski | WHITE PLAINSLast decision Sep 2025 | 43% | 2,300 | |
| 1673 | Livia Morales | VALPARAISO IN, INLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,525 | |
| 1674 | Jason Panek | AKRON OH, OHLast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,053 | |
| 1675 | Sally C. Reason | LOS ANGELES WEST, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,290 | |
| 1676 | Ronald Reeves | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2025 | 43% | 2,572 | |
| 1677 | Sharon Seeley | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2018 | 43% | 615 | |
| 1678 | Carolyn Smilie | ALEXANDRIA, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,424 | |
| 1679 | Kimberly Sorg-Graves | INDIANAPOLIS, INLast decision Sep 2017 | 43% | 443 | |
| 1680 | Dean Syrjanen | MILWAUKEE, WILast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 2,382 | |
| 1681 | Robert J. Tjapkes | GRAND RAPIDS, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,414 | |
| 1682 | Mark Triplett | TACOMA, WALast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,581 | |
| 1683 | Mary F. Withum | NHC CHICAGO, ILLast decision Sep 2016 | 43% | 422 | |
| 1684 | Charlotte A. Wright | SHREVEPORT, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 43% | 3,159 | |
| 1685 | Brian Battles | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 2,438 | |
| 1686 | Young L. Bechtold | STOCKTON, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 901 | |
| 1687 | Caroline H. Beers | HOUSTON WEST, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 3,762 | |
| 1688 | David J. Begley | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 3,393 | |
| 1689 | Vincent Bennett | HOUSTON WEST, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 2,688 | |
| 1690 | Kimberly Boyce | SEATTLE, WALast decision Sep 2020 | 42% | 1,438 | |
| 1691 | Brian Burgtorf | LANSING, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 2,492 | |
| 1692 | Matthew C. Dawson | OMAHA, NELast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 2,509 | |
| 1693 | Joseph F. Dent | ST PETERSBURG FL, FLLast decision Sep 2020 | 42% | 1,829 | |
| 1694 | Jeffrey L. Eastham | LEXINGTON, KYLast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 2,399 | |
| 1695 | Kathleen H. Eiler | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Sep 2023 | 42% | 1,551 | |
| 1696 | Kevin W. Fallis | FLINT, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 3,455 | |
| 1697 | Deborah Foresman | RICHMOND, VALast decision Sep 2022 | 42% | 1,859 | |
| 1698 | Timothy Gates | COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Sep 2019 | 42% | 1,233 | |
| 1699 | Lori S. Grayson | HATTIESBURG, MSLast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 3,137 | |
| 1700 | Kim K. Griswold | SPRINGFIELD MA, MALast decision Jul 2026 | 42% | 3,375 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.